Rad

My favorite

Yo same

:GWsetmyxPeepoPinged:

Rip

heyo drew

good! :D

for flat earthers that don't know, 8 inches per mile^2 is wrong

@Drewski4343 isn't it a parabolic aproximation and not even a sphere at all? xd

i do know that it works for VERY short distances, but not much else

lol

@carlito do you believe that density and buoyancy causes things to fall?

@carlito why do you think things fall if not gravity?

@Drewski4343 no. he said some stuff afterwards that is giving me confusion on whether he is going to try to counter or not

@Drewski4343 but I think it is starting to become clear. The great 97 Eleven that could not be defeated in a flat earth debate has fallen. And it only took 30 messages

i dont think he'll respond

@mineyful you know who 97 is?

@mineyful he is a flat earther. I wouldn't even bother. he used Universal acceleration, the theory that gravity is caused by the world accelerating up. nobody uses that anyway

the arguements

wouldnt do much good

yeah. 97 was the best FE i knew. he debates 10s, if not 100s of people and never lost, including against me. then shadow comes in and strikes him down in 30 damn messages. the answer was RIGHT under my nose and i couldnt find it >:c

mhm

@Biggest_of_Boys yeah it is aimed towards debating the Flat Earth

speeds in which relativistic effects rlly start to kick in i think @Albert Einstein

@Deleted User yes. special relativity shows that time is bendable. if have a twin, you go in a rocket that is going 99.99999% the speed of light, in, lets say 1 month, years may pass for your twin. So your twin aged more than you

this is known as time dilation

and HOW do i get verified globe earther

;-;

;-;'

so the independent is speed and the dependent is time @Deleted User

the time dilated relies on the speed

you are going

you gotta understand just HOW accurate atomic clocks are

atomic clocks are the most accurate clocks ever

o ima read that

hi. if a bot says "Welcome to the Ice Wall!" then they are verifiably homosexual

lol

@Deleted User ok i didn't ignore the variability of radioactive half lives this time.

`Because the Hafele–Keating experiment has been reproduced by increasingly accurate methods, there has been a consensus among physicists since at least the 1970s that the relativistic predictions of gravitational and kinematic effects on time have been conclusively verified. Criticisms of the experiment did not address the subsequent verification of the result by more accurate methods, and have been shown to be in error`

it has been reproduced

with different methods. you can see on the wikipedia page for atomic clocks that there are different types.

!levels

@Deleted User i like your accent.

@GLaDOS who is going to shutdown discord?

and who shutdown 8 chan

How do I get verified globe

Oof I dont like vc cant I do it in text?

I think globe

You cant map the flat earth

Ok.

I am a friend of drewski

I will try once I get on pc

@Bird-Finchine (UK, Wales) isn't concave earth like it's hollow? what about seismology? I don't rlly wanna debate rn i am just wondering that one thing :D

well :/

I mean the autopsy report is pending so we are about to find out. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

u know what I think about his death though? Whether it was suicide or not?

Good riddance.

omg same

omggggggggg

ye

oh ok nvm

so why would it be that shape

is citizen z the owner?

._.

how do i become verified glober

😔

What rlly IS concave earth. I have gotten a few different answers and I am confused.

Oh. So that is concave earth

That look like the stupidest one of em all

Wouldnt we have UPWARDS curvature? And what would gravity be?

🤔

I will definitely be there for four corners to watch

Ik but I mean what would makes things fall on concave? I dont see a way. Even Buoyancy would be a better explanation for anything I can try to imagine on that model

The globe is legit inside out xd

And how would that concave model explain the distant redshifts in galaxies?. If that model is correct, it would be moving away like normal, getting redder, but on the other side of the earth it would seem to get closer, because it would be getting closer

This isnt what we observe though

Many questions to be answered

Yea

Sup

Me neither

~~i dont have one ;c~~

I like to debate gravity for flat earth

Personally I think universal acceleration is a better flat earth model than density and buoyancy

Drewski :D

Rip last night's discussion no FEs came ;c

Bork talked a lil bit to geenpixle, but that was rlly it

I think that universal acceleration is actually a better gravity model for flat earth than density and buoyancy

yeah. density and buoyancy has no pre-assigned vector that points to down

ua, however, actually agrees with the math up to a point

oo what is that

oh cool

@Deleted User do you believe aliens are out there?

lol

so wut do yall think of area 51 raid on september 20

yeah. if the universe is infinite, there has gotta be something out there. Even if it aint, we at least know the universe is 93 bil ly. in that space, there gotta be something

i like to categorize life in to 3 categories: civilized (example being humans), complex (tigers, dolphins, flies, and simple (bacteria, algae

if not civilied, at least one of the other 2

universal acceleration is a better gravity model for flat earth than density and buoyancy

@Abe Lover i mean intelligent life. you know what i mean. we arent like other animals

well. i guess. you can change the words, but we are a level above them. we build cities and tech and other things to live comfortably. animals like i mean it live wild.