The Guy Behind You
Discord ID: 381659314969903106
467 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/5
| Next
its become political because people have polarized the situation depending on your viewpoint. If you want people to have liberties with mask wearing you are seen as contributing to covid spread, but if you want to encourage people to wear masks you seen as impeding on peoples freedom. The reality of the situation should be somewhere in between, but like anything in this political environment it is seen as a black and white scenario
people see it as all or nothing and has therefore been separated by politcal view. If you take me as an example, i believe that masks can be effective in the right scenarios, but it should not impede on the civil liberties of the public. Many would see this in the black and white perspective of me being for people not wearing masks, therefore I deny science and want people to die
its the classic slippery slope argument
thats where the political polarization comes in. People are seen as either believing fully in masks or completely denying it, when in reality it is in between those view points
and I think where many people have an issue is with the science not coming to a consensus on the general mask wearing of the public
its proven to help in certain circumstances, but also proven to be completely ineffective in others
I mean look at the whole lockdown debate, the WHO now comes out against it but there are still those that believe that lockdowns are the only way to stop the spread
It has shifted to a debate on civil liberties to some people, which then creates more of a political debate about it
It all has to do with which costs you think outweigh the benefits
Yes its a good example, if everyone is locked down in there houses away from people it would significantly stop the spread of the virus. At the same time it causes huge detriments to many other aspects of society. Its more extreme than the cost/benefits of mask wearing but thats why theres more debate on that subject
mask wearing that is
some people see it as "just wear a mask its not that hard" but also some others believe that that viewpoint ignores some of the detriments of wearing the mask. Doesn't apply to everyone of course, but thats why people are against mandatory mask wearing
People should make up their own mind about it based on the evidence they have, thats why its so dangerous for information to be censored
Yeah theres certainly those out there that believe that. I think theres many situations where people take a small bit of truth and run with it to something extreme. But a reason we hear so much about that is because it is shown as an example of what the "opposition" thinks
Well there's a difference between censoring harmful information, and censoring opinionated information. If something is against the law it is not protected under freedom of speech, but if someone says something extreme that is only their opinion it is protected under the law
The problem nowadays is that censoring is taking place on opinionated material, not just illegal material
Well take covid for example. If you say something on facebook or twitter that isnt in line with the WHO then you get it removed
even if it is just your opinion
That's where people have to use discretion, censoring shouldn't be used to prevent the possibility of subjective harm. It should be used to prevent impending harm
That where physical speech is protected
I mean it happens all the time, on or off the internet. People take things out of context all the time, or take certain opinions as fact compared to others. The problem is that governments shouldn't decide that for the people it governs. The issue now is that the corporations are the ones that govern these platforms
Well it started with covid
lol
now censorship in regards to covid i guess
I guess I'll sum it up with this since its a long conversation. Organizations like the WHO are there to provide guidance, not governance
It's not the place of government to force people to do things unless they are proven to be against the law
Mask wearing is something where the guidance is to wear it, but it is not the place of the government, federal or corporate, to mandate that people comply with the guidance
i think thats where many people have an issue. corporate governance is not subject to the same restrictions as federal governance
its a little extreme to cry about wearing a mask to a store for 15 minutes i agree, but i think most people have an issue with the broader idea
well thats why theres a different issue for school. They are held to government standards, usually state government, unless they are private schools
Well thats where politics have leeched in to the WHO
theres many non-biased people there
That's why you can see a discrepancy between the scientists involved in the WHO and the people that are actually in charge of the organization
That's the thing, the science is typically all over the place about most issues, and the statements that are made on the scientists behalf is usually influenced until there is an actual consensus
That's how science gets politicized. Some take only the information that suites their viewpoint and ignore the rest
That's why theres such thing as healthy skepticism, the viewpoint that the WHO is right about everything is wrong, but also the viewpoint that they cant be trusted about anything is wrong
but with humans trust is a delicate thing, so once someone loses some amounts of trust with someone or something they have the tendency to stop trusting it entirely
speaking of steam, dont steam clean your masks, its makes them less effective by opening up the pores of the material
lol bringing the tangent full circle
lol cya
Only an exalted cyclops! How could they claim he eulogized a grand wizard?!
lmao
Most people will only ever read the headline unfortunately
Just look at the transition integrity project, they don't plan to have a peaceful election no matter what
What a joke, a country whose government is involved in ethnic cleansing is on the human rights counsel
That's like putting Nazi germany c. 1939 on the human rights council
It's all just a convoluted plot to finally defeat the emus
actually pornhub has been criticized for not doing well at filtering out child pornography https://www.foxnews.com/media/pornhub-doj-investigation-bipartisan-scrutiny
Just to put in to perspective how many people get the flu every year... https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html
Cases are up... but deaths are not. https://covidtracking.com/data/charts/2-metrics-7-day-average-curves
@ray liotta private select same here
this is just the beginning
if somehow biden wins we are screwed
I bet that Ted Cruz runs again in 2024
I just voted in massachusetts and the line was into the parking lot, twice the size as 2018
KANYE 2020
oops i spelled TRUMP wrong
imagine not voting straight republican down the ballot
you either vote for trump or vote for communism
i bet trump said a guy named trump talking about his son
JOE FOR RESIDENT 2020
lol
If you want America to become China, then you vote for Biden
You either vote for Trump or vote for The Great Reset
Take it easy on him, he is a humanitarian, he doesnt want to see millions die waiting for bread lines
joe who?
lmao
Hitler was a meth addict
Hitler would have had insane parties with Hunter
some states will report today, some by wednesday and then PA by firday
friday*
If Joe Biden wins that means that they win the senate and the house because the polls would be right there too. So no impeachment and full bore socialism
I think Trump is gonna smoke slow Joe
and if Trump wins, that pretty much means we keep a majority in the senate
By the way most of the races are right now
I mean he is made of plastic so how bad could the bath water be
.000001% actually
Its the only votes so far cause 2 villages in NH voted at midnight
dicks out for trump
someone told him he had to stamp the ballot
just remember guys that in some states we are gonna see the mail in and early ballots first
dicks lopped off for biden!
Most important poll closing is florida
and georgia
anything except fox lol
I think its all the early ballots that are being counted atm
thats why you see some counties swinging blue that werent in 2016
Indiana and kentucky are gonna be red no matter what
but how florida does is what the tell will be on the rest of the election
if trump takes it by storm then we are in for some lefty meltdowns
i think we will still see a narrower margin. but thats not surprising since it was by like 30% in 2016
here comes the trump train
lets go florida do some work
yeah they call the obvious states right away
vt is always blue, virginia blue, kentucky red
he could possibly flip some but its very VERY unlikely
one big early tell is how miami-dade county goes
if trump loses it by less than 20% this is gonna be one wild ride
467 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/5
| Next