Message from @Qthulhu42
Discord ID: 399249452361318402
your group interests have a lot to do with your individual fortune
try being a black slave in 1700s USA and be "just trying to pursue my own individual interests"
individual interests are suicidal and if they run contrary to the interests of the gorup you get expelled or put in prison.
try being a dalit in pre-colonial India and "just pursuing your own interests"
But my issue is, I don't see how furthering the interests of white people necessarily benefits individual white people - for example, creating more opportunities for white people in x industry I am not involved in
what if your brother is?
retard
Then that would probably be in my _genetic_ self-interest, but not all white people have a relatedness factor that big
imagine being such a little fgt that you think it's okay to turn your back on your own kind.
no retard, your brother would be richer and happier and more secure
that should make you happy, that should be something you should want
unless you have literal autism
having more happy, secure, functional people around you is good for you anyways
so q would you let a black man rape a white woman, because it's not in your interest to stop him if it meant you might get hurt?
It is, but my evolutionarily inbuilt altruism has little reason to work towards people not in my immediate family unless it gives me some reciprocal benefit, e.g. trade, virtue
you are severely atomized
do you have friends?
No, but I wouldn't let a white man rape a black woman.
seriously these are things only someone with no friends or meaningful connections to others would say
"no, I do not care if my cousins have to raise their kids in a dangerous hellhole full of murderous POC"
My point here is that the difference between me and a random white guy and me and a random black guy is fairly insignificant
is it?
Why would certain races be inherently violent?
it's actually not q.
How would that occur evolutionarily
because of the warrior gene being about 50x more prominant in blacks, thus they are more violent
I don't care about the mechanism, data shows it
I don't need to know why
but I am not even against violence, but they group up to fight so we would have to also or else we would die
it's just obvious, in a competitive society your group's survival is YOUR survival
do you have a job?
Shouldn't we then select for nonviolent genes, not skin colour genes?
race is more than skin color, commie
race isnt skin color q
This honestly just sounds like what I hear from bad communists
no seriously, are you employed?
skin color is an element of it, but race is more than that
and if so, HOW did you get your job?
I agree, but how do you tell what race a person is?
oh look "muh commies" i feel like we discovered a horseshoe advocate
1 look at them 2 dna test if necessary