but I am not even against violence, but they group up to fight so we would have to also or else we would die

it's just obvious, in a competitive society your group's survival is YOUR survival

do you have a job?

Shouldn't we then select for nonviolent genes, not skin colour genes?

race is more than skin color, commie

race isnt skin color q

This honestly just sounds like what I hear from bad communists

no seriously, are you employed?

skin color is an element of it, but race is more than that

and if so, HOW did you get your job?

I agree, but how do you tell what race a person is?

oh look "muh commies" i feel like we discovered a horseshoe advocate

1 look at them 2 dna test if necessary

I analyze their bone structure and compare it against the racial anthropology I've studied

http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com there is plenty of data here on race

I mistrust DNA testing ever since it was revealed that the big ancestry testing companies might tamper the results to try to "troll" racists

stop feeding hte troll. he is arguing from dishonest premises

yeah

I mean if he wants to just be an atomized individual trying to survive in a world of group vs group, that's up to him

if nobody has his back then he will learn the hard way why he's stupid

Any community would serve me just as well as a race, would it not?

not if the other communities are different races than you and are racially exclusive

go to the Asian Chamber of Commerce and ask for a job

see if the LA Bloods will defend you from violence

try to get a date from the orthodox jewish girls at the synagogue

I'm not sure how the discrimination of other groups is relevant to the success of a nondiscriminatory group

I notice the logic keeps changing. Every time I point out that obviously a bunch of people cooperating for self interest is superior competitively to being atomized spergs, he changes to find a new line of bullshit about why we should just stop caring

that's because you do not seem to understand that scarcity exists

And surely, if it's a community I choose, rather than am born into, I can go with the one that serves me best

hypothetical: there is enough food to barely feed 20 people. In an attempt get this food, there are 10 Asians working as a team, 10 blacks working as a team, and 2 whites working as lone individuals. Who starves?

if you can't understand that then you should move on

q you seem like a lolbertairan, read hoppe plz and pull your head out of your dishonest ass

even in a libertarian society guys like him would get steamrolled as others formed voluntary unions and voluntarily free associated until they choked out his neighborhoods and industries

I see your point, but not all groups are racially discriminatory. If the white people integrated with, say, the blacks, they would perform better

would they?

why?

The group they are in is larger

what if the other group is better coordinated?

let's say the 10 asians understand english fine but communicate in chinese

actually wait

let's take it to the logical conclusion