And show a minimum of understandig of how the legal world works

Nothing is black and white

Yes a lot is bunk... hell, probably half is bunk

Oooh

Link please

Thanks man!

Btw, thanks for the covid explanation yesterday wr got of on the wrong foot, but your insight was very refreshing

Jezus... way to fu king spin the discussion

Jexus you dont even read half of what is being said do you?

Dont humor him beth... i can smell a bad actor a mile away

Bringing up cases that anyone following the lawfare has no mind to

*pays

Oooh so now i am lying

Wow

🤣🤣🤣🤣

What do i do.... :-o i... i.... moooommmmyyyy

Quote: everything you say is a lie.

End quote

Wanna try again?

Because we know it will likely turn out to be either a long road case like jill steins. Or that it is not proveable.

The PA mail in voting law and the georgia signature law. Those are (in my mind, i dont speak for others) the big winners.

But yeah keep shouting about testimonies even a 5 year old would dismiss

You are probably one of those who thinks that isaac saul dude on twitter does good breakdowns xD

As judged in the parnell case

She uses words like kraken, biblical... and tweets more than she actually does work...

Nobody here cares what she says

Theres affadavits, and well see in court. And after that appelate court,.... and so on.

But acting like hers is the big case is just... lazy

Run? I am right here.

Im just not playing the game on your terms.

The strongest cases are the unconstitutionality of mail in and signature laws.

All the rest does not matter to me. I would not be suprised if dominion and lots of analysis are fake. But those

Do
Not
Matter

What is not an argument?

The fact that i clearly and repeatedly state that the constituinality will determin the outcome in my opinion?

Or you just spouting the same weak cases (that we agree are weak)?

Probably... there is so much going on... nobody will be right 100%.

That and the human component makes it even harder as that is never a factual component

Uhu, now keep reading...

That reaction was made because yes, it is not possible to give you insight in every single claim made

Try refuting the constitutionality argument though.

Morning maw! Sleep well?

Same thing lately... getting old i gues

Yeah character flaw of mine when it's a subject i care about.

Which is where i am ... ish..

In the parnell case it didnt

Unless there is an update

As far as i know, the parnell case claiming constitutionallity was accepted on its merrits

The trump case gor dismissed with prejudice... but that was just a call to amend the claim no?

Zulu. Insight on my parnell comment?

Thanks. I though as i said. It was challenging the const. Of mail in.

And was accepted. With opinion stating it might win on merrit.

Dont kbow what the relief asked was though

Hmm ill read it. But didnt the first judge had it go through?

What the actual?....

Sorry i see so many here in belgium say that stuff... its hard to discern when som1 is laugjing

Nah it was earlier this week. Even halted the cerftification process

According to everyone here i am the epithome of stupidity... so xD

Lookin for it

Tell that to our american politics correspondent

Its ok guys. I might not recognize certain forms of humor. But i laugh at everyone. Myself first and foremost

Zulu, i cant find the document. But it seems it was a lowercourt judge and this one is PA Supreme court

Memorandum-Opinion-Filed.pdf

Thats the one i think

Btw something else, y'all heard the robbie willaims xmas song? XD

-let's lie to santa klaus, tell hin its 1984- #gold

@Zuluzeit i linked to older document from the lower court regarding parnell

Thanks man!

Im hungry for info xD i only do 5-6 h of pdocast listening durinf weekends... and i always feel like im behind afterwards

Hmmmmm

Sushi

Fact! Yet stil friends who teach and only read headlines see me and others like the people here as complete uninformed idiots xD

Oooh so bow it was heard...

Isent it weird then that they just dismiss it in court like they did now?

Nobody told me bout the stigma.... no

Problem is that in the US, you have some likeminded news and people

Here it is all copy pasta from wapo or cnn

Magnificent and weird creatures

We had 1 journalist who had an article written about him, in the paper he writes for.

Complaing that people were calling him, an "honest journo" fake news

I prefer frog

Yet it stated that on its merrit it could succeed? Might have read it wrong though... no higher degrees here xD

Its not a thing here though... its mostly to be had at chinese restos

Fun fact. French fries are actually belgian

Thanks! That clears up a lot

Belgium was part of france then, yet was made on what is now belgian soil

We we're passed around as property a loooooong time xD

Not anymore xD trust me

We are the but of every joke

We have th world record in formng a government

Over a dozen diff parties

And the elite always form a coalition...

13 y olds? 😏😅🤣

To much?....

Its not a black and white issue... same claim can be made bout christian missionaries (minus the hand cutting... that was just awefull)

🤣🤣🤣 jezus i should have joined this app earlier...

XD

Thanks! Am i weird in not agreeig with the judge here?

Didnt the pay gap research use bad data? They had a hearing in australia bout that i thinj

Im off guys xD gotta feed the bear

Nice meeting you all and tty later

I hope i missed something xD

Trust me we have over a dozen parties. Only thing more parties does is take away you choice.

The same ones form a coalition anyway you vote

Unless 1 has a complete majority... which brings you back to the same issue as with a 2 party system...

But that never happens beczuse of the dilution of the votes over parties

Hi guys!

Interesting topic.

Educate us doc

C-span? On yt? Only just got home from work

Hey same here...

Marx was wrong in way more than that xD

And ive just reread das kapitaal

As a european, the EU is tocix garbage. The idea is good, the policy is not

Sure

Im not claiming im an economist, but ive read the audiobook twice.