as well as much of the weaponry of the plane focused on BTH attacks

i cant post my political compass so shite

where can i post it so that you guys can see where i stand?

https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2?ec=4.5&soc=-1.59

on economics im at marker 4.5

Libertarian vs authoritarian im -1.59

i mean, i got a friend who is an actual Ethno nationalist type so maybe i can ask him any questions on his belief if you guys have any

and i mean full on "mother europa" type

idk who "my people" are for ya

codes i can answer that for him without asking, "they" (the ethno nationalists) believe Hewbrews are trying to pollute and destroy the "goym" aka them, to destroy their herritage and identitiy from the world

as stupid as it sounds, full on shadow race war style

it is idiotic..ive been trying to move him away from it towards the idea of Roman Republicanism

and yes he basically believes the Camp des saints

i feel like if i posted his evidence, i would end up being banned

wtf am i even called if i sit at 4.5, -1.59

far right libertarian?

also, people seem to misunderstand that fascism does not require ethnic division

nazism does, but Facism can survive without it

oh which btw, happy belated Samhain everyone

this probably sounds like a stupid thing to say

but are those..camo colored pussy hats?

perfect, you can scream Niko niko nee while blowing holes through a target

idfk

but the college republicans club im in is trying to create a "2nd amendment" day in which we are bringing a buncha people who have never even used a gun and teaching them how to shoot as well as allow them to shoot for the first time

since many of us are either Active service, been in active service, or just civilian gun owners, we have plenty of firearms to go around

as well as plenty of trainers

thats one way to ruin a perfectly good sunset

mainly because none of us own bows, we all at least have a gun or two and we are using the clubs funds for ammo

i mean, the college dems had a solid 4 year head start on us when it came to recruiting

but in our first meeting we already beat their numbers

having worked for the DFL (democratic Farmer Labor party of Minnesota) as well as being part of republican culture, i think the Dem's believe a little too much in the appeal of their values

but if im gonna talk about that i should move chats

i actually pretended to be a furry for about 4 years to appease my Ex

like full on fursona and everything

Hey does anyone know where Trump's pulling national guard members from?

Were you expecting a joke or reasoned response from them? While there are plenty of liberals who still act rationally and can genuinely give reasoned response or maybe even laugh at the memes as well, blue check marks tends **Not** to be those people

Someone kill me please, I got door knocking for the DFL for three hours ;-;

Tim pool was saying the meritocracy should be the basis of a system, but it should not be the only factor

While a persons achievements should hold the most weight, other factors should be taken into account as well

That's what he meant by it

Not wealth

I would guess much more like a personal statement to a college when it comes to a hiring process

"here were my struggles in life" type of thing

Again, no.

Modern day runs on the assumption all people of a certain race face the same struggles

I.E. affirmative action and diversity

Under a meritocratic system such as the one I described, people can explain their own sturggles and no employer is forced to take them into account

However, they have the possibility of doing so

Book, your not understanding this right

Even that kid in prep school can face a struggle in life

Take me for example, I come from a rather well off family to the point I can pay all 4 years tuition and come out debt free. But when I'm asked about a struggle I had in life I typically write about my own bout with depression and my fight against it without medication and how that affected my life academically and personally

Someone who faces struggles wants the opportunity to earn their keep, not be handed it

Again, no

Book you seem to be missing a step or two here which could be my fault for not explaining correctly

Let's take college admissions again. Now when people are admitted to college, their GPA and ACT/SAT scores hold the most weight in an application process AKA their achievements in high school

However many colleges (including my own) allow for a personal statement to add a human factor to the application, to explain a struggle in your life that could have caused your achievements

While the personal statement does not hold as much weight as the ACT and GPA, it helps in a decision making process

Lowering the bar is giving the assumption that a group of people all face the same problem and need Pity for ir

If anything I wouldent be accepted because of my GPA

My GPA was a 2.3, yet my ACT was a 28

The personal statement helped them understand maybe my GPA was skewed because of my bout with depression

Grades are the academic benchmark of success Kali

And your right, but they are used nontheless

We may hate the rings, but to reach our goals we need to jump through tjem

While I was in the 90th percentile for grades, my ACT for my school was the 10th percentile

Yep, my school was essentially where as long as you turned in homework you ended in the 3.0s at least

On top of the fact we also had some really easy blowoff electives to boost gpa

This also points out another problem with a purely meritocratic system, there is simply no such thing as a good metric for it. There needs to be other metrics to round out it's flaws

IQ is also a horrible metric, you would need to test them for EQ in tandum with it

>tfw Emotional cognitive intelligence is non-existent

As I've said, there is no actual good metric for a meritocracy, there needs to be other factors to round out a tests flaws

Kali, that's not how studying works mate..

Many of my friends as well as myself are studying for the LSAT. the LSAT is meant to test your grasp on logic

So when you study, the study material they provide is meant to help your brain increase a grasp in logic

You are not studying word for word the test, but instead increasing the abilities the test is looking at

^

"Fluid intelligence is defined as the ability to solve new problems, use logic in new situations, and identify patterns. In contrast, crystallized intelligence is defined as the ability to use learned knowledge and experience."

Kali, you can easily train yourself for such a thing

Kali, lemme ask you how do you develop your skills of abstract thinking while you grow up?

Look Wol he has already fell to Ad hominems and insults if that says anything about his arguments

Mate fluid IQ is a composite of this abilities

@JohnOakman that needs to be pinned because that was fucking great

Takes neuroscience advice from a psychiatrist

Lemme go ask my poly sci professors and economics real quick

I believe they call this an "argument from authority" which typically leads to logical fallacy

I.E. "he says this so it must be true"

Well that's a pretty big assumption that I'm a moral relativist

So far let's look at the two arguments and how they have argued thus far

Usually when you begin to insult and demean the other side, you have lost the arhument

Ey wol, I gotta get back to door knocking but ping me if ya need some help with kali

wol actually right here. His and my arguments were that the problem solving speed of the brain would increase, just it's capacity to solve new problems

"wol actually right here. His and my arguments were that the problem solving speed of the brain would increase, just it's capacity to solve new problems"

**skipping an entire line to misrepresent a statement like a true winner of any argument**

So far Kali ya checked three boxes for bad arguments, insulting your opponent, the lack of ability to argue your own side as shown with the need for a video to do it for you, and misrepresent the arguments of your opponets in a true "so what your saying is" fashion

When it turned from a 1v1 to a 5v1 Kali, usually means that guy with 5 convinced the other 4

*I still have 40 more doors to knock, kill. Me.*

That is something I wanted to ask, how can we fix the fatherless problem? How can we convince these people to stay with their child?

Or at least, not have children with someone until they are comitted

That on too of the fact some women will face post partum (sorry in spelling) depression as well..the feeling of ready may never come

Wol hits what I've found close..people are no longer willing to sacrifice for a relationship nor put in any effort on making one work long term