Was actually thinking that

Missed my chance this time around tho

Partisan bias is one hell of a drug

I just find it funny

Awh. We should have a town hall on porn

There’s an argument to be made it’s detrimental to well being

I’m down.

That’s doesn’t necessarily mean it should be illegal tho

This went from we to me real quick

Bruh I could just copy paste one of the million studies on the topic

That’s a lot of work tho

Why was I mentioned?

I don’t think so

This is a guilt trip

Lots of intermediate fossils have been found

Especially between fish and amphibians

Using well being as a moral foundation, is there a moral difference between a murder and an accidental killing?

Very little

Depends on when

It’s not worshipped though. Valued yeah. But not worshipped. I’m a capitalist and I don’t find money worth worshipping. I’d imagine I’m not alone

Yeah but people do things against theyreeconomic interest all the time.

So pick one.

No I mean the worship/obey thing.

Um. No

?

There’s a difference between skipping church and putting money above the ideals of your religion

Wow.

What’s the alternative

History suggests no

Partly

But also anti-semitism in general across history

Yeah

What if the religion is the shared value

@Deleted User the reason seems kind of irrelevant

Which one

What preferential treatment are you referring to

?

Religious or ethnic

Well it depends on what practical policy you suggest to remedy the situation

@Deleted User

More like a historical agreement

And just the fact there are thousands and thousands of families living there

Should America be slowed to have its land since it was taken by conquest?

In Israel?

Also, that’s not the group of people Britain signed the agreement with

Only if you want it to be

With the current system of who has Jerusalem, anyone can observe their religious practices their

If it fell back into its previous hands I imagine that wouldn’t be the case

I feel like the choice is rather obvious

One thing at a time dude. Jerusalem first

I mean on ownership

Maybe not, but probably

Jorgensen is on the ballot right next to Trump.

Next townhall should be on hormone blockers

No

Because the names were associated with poverty not race

We know this because other traditionally black surnames like Jefferson and Washington were not impacted

And even if none of that was true you still only have a disparity

That racial disparity alone doesn’t prove the reason for the disparity is racism

Not necessarily equal, proportional to the amount of each race below and above the poverty line

Also note: black individuals in America are the richest of any group of black people in the world

I’d put my money into he dies if u picked a poor or tube sounding name associated with Whit epeople you might get a similar result

What?

No I’m saying the study might not have been measuring what it thought it was measuring

It might have been measuring classism more than racism

And traditionally black surnames

You’re missing my point completely

A name like Clyde or Kyle

Would be associated with being a redneck presumably

I’m not making the claim. I don’t have to demonstrate anything

I’m poking holes in the claim of the study and yourself

I’m offering up a reasonable alternative

Okay

I said I wasn’t sure the methodology wasn’t faulty

A name like Clyde or Kyle is basically white. Also associated with being poor or being a redneck.

I’d be curious to see if that may effect and employers decision

But we don’t have the poverty-control. So now I think we can’t conclude ether the study was measuring race or class bias

That’s the problem

Dude

Tyrone is a black sounding name and a pooor sounding name theoretically

It’s both

And if you don’t have a control for the poverty part you haven’t isolated race as the only possible factor

Idk how I can say it clearer than that

Okay?

Okay

Then what’s ur point?

Because if you can’t isolate your independent variable then the study is basically null

Cuz it’s vulnerable to confounding variables

To a reasonable degree then

But there is a fairly big chance it was athebpoverty thing more than the race thing

If they ran this study with Clyde as the name we could compare and see

That would be interesting

Also unconscious biases is not the same thing as systemic racism

That isn’t true though dude

Again Washington and Jefferson

I don’t care

They are. It’s been documented

Ditto

That would be true if there wasn’t another potential rule with less exceptions: poverty

Yes