the huge amount of regulations in the healthcare market

net neutrality is useless

Incredible.

Yes

it's the regulation that harms businesses and creates monopolies

Oh yeah to add, regulation creates monopolies

The state intervention in the economy creates artificial high barriers to entry

Regulations do the exact opposite

Which creates the monopolies

Tell that to the healthcare market, ISPs

since the only reason the monopolies exists are due to regulations

for example ISP has zoning laws

Damn, I want to sit down and talk but I gotta do human things

I'll get back in a sec

But a 100% free market causes monopolies

That's what I thought

Competition is best when there are few monopolies or oligopolies. Regulatory barriers to entry into some fields are too high in my opinion, which should be fixed, but conversely regulations / tax collections on the big businesses in those fields is often lacking , which only exacerbates the problem

Look at happened in the late 1800s to the early 1900s

There was a complete monopoly

Gilded age

There were several monopolistic organizations in major industries

@Anon365 never

A free market never causes a monopolies that’s a myth

A natural monopoly DOES NOT EXIST

@Leo (BillNyeLand) all due to state intervention

The gilded age was never “free”

Remember the tarrifs

Companies will just lower their prices

Then the competition will be crushed

that’s also a myth

That's what happened

Have you heard of dow

It literally happened

He used to sell chemicals

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-q1fSNzYNhg

it talks about predatory pricing

Wait

You're for a completely free market, right?

Not completely

Besides in a free market, they wouldn’t exist :
-The recouping of losses, which is essential for a predatory pricing strategy, may not occur because rival firms could just exit the market when prices are lowered and re-enter when prices are increased.

-Even if rival firms are forced out of the market when prices are increased by the predatory firm, this could induce new competitors into the market.

-The predatory firm must have a supply large enough to meet all demand at the lowered price. If its capacity is not great enough, prices will rise again.

-If the predatory firm were to repeatedly lower prices when rivals re-entered the market, the rival firms could short the dominant firms stock in an attempt to make up for losses resulting from the lower price.

A mostly free one, right?