@Sassy Undeniably Everything can be explained using math, the lives of everybody nowadays depends on math

@SpiderLedgic (Cancer) @dragon_slayer14 You both are just ranting by now. Can you actually try to pressure on a point?

It gets kind is of boring

I was pushing a point until dragon made citizen go away.

Who?

@Sassy Undeniably I was trying to start a conversation and you didn’t answer. So don’t play the “ I’m king of debates”

@Sassy Undeniably Ok, lets talk about Polaris

Nope

Why would they disappear bottom first on a flat earth?

Perspective doesn’t work like that, they shrink in size uniformly, not bottom first.

@Flat Earth PhD Can you please use true law of perspective to prove that things disappear bottom first, I know you have a PhD, it shouldn’t be that hard

The* not true* autocorrecting causes problems

Ranty gave a perfect example contradicting yours.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xTitrs30r80

5:40 is the time stamp

I could find the original

Couldn’t*

Things don’t disappear bottom up. Thanks Ranty!

Can you debunk it?

He didn’t lose anything of the target

And ranty proved that your demonstrations are BS

By the logic of your picture thing should disappear a lot quicker

@Flat Earth PhD I can’t send photos

Bye to everyone

Hey my friend here wants to see the easiest proof for flat earth, anyone?

@California Nightmare 3.0 Curvature: Eratóstenes Rotation: Eotvos

@California Nightmare 3.0 It does not work in a flat earth

Once you add a third point it completely blows up @California Nightmare 3.0

@California Nightmare 3.0 Let me invite you to an event: https://eratosthenes.ea.gr/content/experiment

You will see with your own eyes earth isn’t flat

@California Nightmare 3.0 We are not assuming a ball. We will measure the sun and prove a sphere is the only shape congruent with observations. Will you join?

Have you read how does the experiment will work?

We won’t assume anything, we will collect data and se what it shows @California Nightmare 3.0

Will you join?

@California Nightmare 3.0 The more far apart from the rest of the group you are the better

Do you understand why?

Why?

A ok

Np

👍

Ok, lets derive the formula

> Btw a physician is a doctor, you probably mean physicist. And them agreeing alone is not sufficient, what have they done to gain credibility? And what is the evidence to their claim?
@curious guy you know what he meant

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy lol

I mean that it’s clear by context what @CatataFish meant

He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven

@curious guy Nice

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy here

Ok

Sorry

Long time ago

Nope

I am

> I am
Completely sure is fake

Ok

Let me help you then

What do you want to know?

Are you a flat earther?

Why is it obvious?

> Bc my floor isnt curved is it
@G_h_o_s_t_l_y_m_e_t_e_o_r Come on, you know that’s a dumb argument. We can do better

At the scale of the earth, flat or not, the floor not curving will not prove anything

Me or @Sic semper tyrannis ?

Man it must be very hot at that altitude. Cool photo @Logrian

Nope

> It's obvious that the people in Australia would fall into space If a the earth was round
@G_h_o_s_t_l_y_m_e_t_e_o_r they would not

Why?

It depends on your reference frame

If you are outside, of the earth it would look like they are upside down. Or they might look normal, it depends on your orientation

Remember there is no universal down, it depends on your reference frame

,> Whats keeping them from falling
@IXI the mass of the earth

> Your just with the government trying to lie
@G_h_o_s_t_l_y_m_e_t_e_o_r that is just ridiculous . Are you a troll?

> What has the mass of the earth got to do with this
@G_h_o_s_t_l_y_m_e_t_e_o_r Objects generate an apparent force proportional to their mass

> @pablochanches proof?
@IXI Cavendish

You seem to be one

I don’t say it because of that

Like a pull

The actual way it works is kind of complicated.

But you can see it in action for yourself

Search for the cavendish experiment

It works by bending space time, as theorized in general relativity and then proved by muons, the LIGO experiment and others

> Why are you even hear
@G_h_o_s_t_l_y_m_e_t_e_o_r To talk. Why are you here?

So you are here just to feed your conformation bias.

> Your probably just here to make fun of people with a different opinion
@G_h_o_s_t_l_y_m_e_t_e_o_r I am not making fun of you

I am presenting other options, so we can search for truth

Instead of just posting a link, will you explain why cavendish is wrong please

Then I can start posting links to references validating cavendish and we are not going anywhere.

Instead of parroting show you know

Don’t change the topic

@Logrian Just posting images will not take the conversation anywhere.

> I said show me a cavendish working in a sealed container
@IXI So we agree it works outside one. Why would it work differently in a sealed container?

And you are shifting from my question @IXI

Ok we are shifting again, once you are against one corner you go to the next one. Ok, give me the masses and distances between asteroids and I will show you why they don’t collide @IXI

To my eyes they don’t. “They seem”, not they are. @IXI

You need to give actual data

Genetic fallacy

And the mass is?

We are missing the mass

“Sound ridiculous to me, it must be false” Again, another fallacy

You are shifting again

Now put the data into the universal law of gravitation, the force is actually minimal

Remember the distance should be in meters, not kilometers