English isn't my mother language

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy lol

What? @rAven

I mean that it’s clear by context what @CatataFish meant

@pablochanches I already have derived it, and at 10 meters height above sea level and 80° horizontal AOV, the angular drop in the appearance of the horizon due to it's curvature should be 0.0237°, or 1/20th the angular size of the moon, basically 1-5 pixels if generous, so no, the curvature of the horizon should not be visible in compressed images of the horizon at low altitude

He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven

@curious guy Nice

> He is correcting him in a small mistake, that he made too @rAven
@pablochanches oh did I make that mistake? Could you point me to it?

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy

Wait

That one wasn't clear in context

> Well that depends on the credibility of the physician, and whether the statement is backed up by evidence
@curious guy here

In a medical topic that statement is still valid, I assumed you were talking about evolution

Why would I mention physicists if he's talking about physicians?

MOVE THIS TO CIVIL DEBATE CHANNEL

thanks

final warning

Ok

What's the civil debate channel for? Miscellaneous topics?

It's about the earth??

Sorry

nw

Cata. found the curve yet?

???

Long time ago

Lots of people look for the curve without knowing how much it should show, atleast in terms of horizon curvature

The earth is huge

Oh this isn't a debate server, didn't know

at what point could you see it then?

It depends, how good are your eyes?

I don't know how good eyes are at seeing the horizon curve, but I can find the horizon curve

Hello fellow flat earth era

hello flat earther @Oak Δ

Anyone seen the curvature yet?

hiya guys 😁

btw, i can see the horizon curve

hiya flat 😁

Howzitgoin

👍