ThatPreciseBloke
Discord ID: 231954525898932256
517 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 5/6
| Next
Now you could say the same thing about God but the difference between Him and secular tyrants are that the tyrants of both the left and rignt tax you for the crime of existing, while God only took hunanity out of a perfect circumetance to teach Adam, Eve, and everyone thereafter why relations and sociability between people, families friends etc is important.
Additionally, he also did this to teach us how hedonism and self indulgence wll but gets in the way of the aims of both healthy individuals and collectives, regard less of religion, race, colour and creed.
Out of which comes the fine line that seperates, yet complimentarily emphasises both liberty and morals (through self evident empirical, existential, experiential, and experimental truths) is drawn...
Perhaps her husband was the shooter?
Or boyfriend or fuck buddy etc?
Tap to see the meme - https://ifunny.co/fun/xATVkkyK7?s=u
Tap to see the meme - https://ifunny.co/fun/cgvfpqHP7?s=u
T R I P O L O S K I
ha lol her culture is one to talk about incestuous relationships ๐
children of Ham at it again (6000BC kids will get that reference)
Support a duopoly? Nah id make my own soft drink, invent the billboards, and associate my invention with the soft drink to not only promote said invention but also my new soft drink company and newly invented ad space <:Ancap_Smiley:538150164800733204> ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ฏ
Yep, also (intellectual property is inherently) uncompetitive and thus in violation of the nap
> Now companies will have to meet my patent by buying the rights to children and making them ad slaves
Were speaking of intellectual property, not ethics and/or individuals (fallacy of equivocation btw) ... The existance of Intellectual property laws implies the collectivist material enforcement upon individual usage of media or content by way of force, which violates the NAP
> Also technically the NAP is a violation of the NAP
How is a principle designed to dissuade antagonistic acts inheirently antagonistic?
It might help to get the service manual and see what screw types fit
Also you can get replacement keys online from replacementlaptopkeys.com for about $4 per key, ive used them for when keys broke and the replacements are as close to OE as you can get
Might go without saying but do use linux, ive seen better battery life and performance of course so it definitely will help if you dont mind sacrificing compatibility
Idek whats even going on here lol
@unwoundtoast were you saying i was wrong because i called out darops for taking yhe convo out of the original context (being intellectual property)?
While ethical and pragmatist dillemas do cross paths in practice, when one speaks of one in its own particular sense in theory, its fallacious to shut down a topic regarding such, due to the mere possibility of the circumstance being ethically questionable, especially when there is no existing precedent to begin with
Hence my answer to the question of "why are pragmatic and ethical matters being conflated" being, that it boils down to the innate egocentric/narcissistic desire of some individuals to ultimately control of a self serving political narrative, which is unjust
Tl:dr while ethical and pragmatic affairs are conceptually different (thats no question) ethical matters can often become pragmatic affairs given proper circumetances and present conditions...
Idk why that would be a "retarded" outlook (unless one believes every single ethically significant matter will invariably become a pragmatic matter, and i dont necissarily believe that the case...)
And no the NAP isnt required to be collectively enforced involuntary to function, as a verbal mutual agreement wouldnt always necessitate a totalitarian state to back it if said participants are in agreeance...
Check the cycles with batteryinfoview
If they legit threw away a battery with so few cycles on it they are legit smooth brain
universal/free healthcare is a spook
1. its not universal
2. its not free
3. if the lines are long, its not even fucking healthcare
and people pay for that?
if they come for my guns theyre getting my bullets
lol no oxens were tractors... blacks were the combine harvesters ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฏ
(as were every other race at some point in time and in history also but you wont hear that in the MSM will ya)
@๐ฒ Derpy โถ or the *barbary slave trade for that matter
> vote blue no matter who
Ok so what if trump was a democrat hm?
yep, vote blue "no matter who"...
(Assuming you believe a paper slip will win you any civil liberties to begin with ๐)
thats because what theyre trying to sell as equality is in actuality a form of social reductionism... *NO EXCEPTIONALISM ALLOWED BECAUSE IT TRIGGERS ME AND MY 35 GENDER IDENTITIES REEEE*
basically a healthy combo of right wing death squads and genuinely big brain optics
Picture i took at daytona the day trump was there
> Assuming good wives that look for more than just a sugar daddy exist the sub 20 y/o range exist
the fact that some people feel the need to virtue signal like this in spite of other peoples opinions, then when someone with a differing opinion comes up and complains about it for whatever reason (such as having to explain to your kids why some entitled bitch is wearing a vagina on her head), complain to them that "there are other people with opinions different to yours" is what honestly pisses me off
at least admit youre a bigot and not care what anyone else thinks but nuuu gotta pretend like youre righteous and can do no wrong....
hope their selfish asses all get melted by their utopian overlords in gulag incinerators just like the innocent kids (that they concieved fucking every tyrone and chad around and then waste in abortion clinics) when the time comes... teach em a thing or two why freedoms pretty fucking important, and give the rest of us common folk some good old fashioned poetic justice (lord forgive me)
self defense is a moral right without a need for legal justification yes
as for the constitution being immoral, if its designed to be amended id say it would depend on which versions feature identity politics and which versions dont but yeah
god had to have created the earth in 6 (either metaphorical or literal) days but has existed since for an unknown amount of time I think
because afaik theres nothing in the bible that gives any sort of specific timeline, between the creation, fall, and garden even in genesis... the best the biblical literalists have is a metaphor that states 1 "god day" is 1000 human years when also combined with some prophecies (allegedly)... am I making sense or missing something?
*"LoL dOeS iT UsE TaPeS"* - "master race" of neckbearded pc users that find validation in putting themselves on a pedestal due to the capabilities of their choice of electronics
jk @Mintmaru keep rocking that sucker, she owes you nothing ๐
I know it was a joke, although I think floppies are electromagnetically similar to a cassette or VHS tape last I checked
~~Ive got a unopened 25 pack of 3.5" diskettes if that good ole reliable dinosaur you have needs a recovery disk ๐~~
(im one to talk, I own pcs that feature mobile pentium 4s and amd athlon palomino cores from the early 2ks so yee)
also my daily up until recently was a bloomfield xeon if that matters so lol
While i believe God transcends space/time also, not only does the Bible speak of a universal beginning in Gen 1:1 but in addition even modern science has more evidence to a universal beginning than an infinite one through red shift etc
In addition, an infinite, immanent universe would be problematic in the sense that time would have to be based through an immenently based descriptor (eg nation, culture, ones own weekly rohtine etc) and not in the context of a metanarrative such as the one present in religious texts such as the Bible
Besides the fact that an infinite universe would basically mean (through re incarnation, pagan rituals, new world order etc) that all were and everything we consider holy is conceptually destined to be are cogs in a physical and spiritual chaotic debt and death machine known as the universe and cosmic consciousness and thus its (biblically) fallen subjects and their tyranny... How romantic is that? ๐
Rip florida i actually like that place now that ive been there lol
Especially compared to cuckistan its high income taxes and property costs plus salt on the roads rotting out my cars subframe and body panels REEEEE
You see this is why we need a small govt that we can manage albeit one thats productive, otherwise we either get george orwells wet dream or pointless arguments as to whether a piece of paper defines us or not (and while in moral principle it shouldnt,practically speaking its significant in regards to basically everything libertarians would consider holy as it provides sound definitions of the rights freedoms and principles we currently advocate for) ...
The constitution irregardless of semantics was intended as a small govt arrangement, and while it defines legal matters on a collective basis, a good thing about it its not so overbearing of a basis that our sesame credit gets ruined everytime we jerk off, and not so underbearing of a basis that no one is held accountable irregardless of religious or political belief, which inevitably results in yugoslavisation and microcollectivisation of said group and then middle age feudalism 2.0 electric boogaloo happens...
Besides, the constitution not only was a far lesser evil than the alternative (rothschild fiat currency enforced debt slavery by order of the king of england unto the colonies) but (again, assuming theres nothing about it that puts anyone above another on the basis of identity)
If the constitutional definition of slavery is being able to defend your own property without necissitating outside help, freedom to practice religion, freedom of speech, freedom of association, and private property rights, then sign me the fuck up because society went wrong the moment we started pandering to anyone who would even fancy the concept of, and concepts that support big government + the unholy principalities, powers, forces and tyranny it enables in the long term...
I say we hose down those entitled sorry excuses for leaders with gasoline and light em for good measure (or at the very least their lawbooks)
New xeons are but the one I ran you could buy on ebay for under 50, as for the bloomfield one i was talking about;i got out of an hp z400 for free so dw im not hiding vast riches or anything
I was talking about how the constitution is necissarily significant in light of how much worse laws could be had, but ok
out of an old hp z400 workstation that had a proprietary psu pinout, and i was bit crazy in the sense i wanted to run 2 gpus (keep in mind this was during the maxwell and r9 2xx/3xx era so no polaris either so gpus were more power hungry) so i parted out that system and built what eventually became the sleeper, which of course i used for a good 4-5 years
That processor went to 3.8/4.1GHz turbo from its stock 3.06/3.2GHz turbo, and it got the same IPC as an i5-3470 with twice the threads
Not bad for a now de ade old piece of silicon huh ๐
I was talking about its inportance from a legal standpoint... Besides the fact that anyone hellbent on taking over a country will find loopholes to exploit at some point anyhow, thats basically that
HEY GUYS GUESS THE FRICCING WHAT
I WORK AT CANADA COMPUTERS NOW
E (to the power of grus big dick energy)
I believe so, although its in burlington
they might be hiring in more places than that but im not for certain
put in my resume got an interview followed up a couple times just to check the app status then I got the call
you have to apply online but a good way to increase your chances is to get the managers attention at the sotre you intend on working at
meet him shake hands etc and such is the beginning of your rapport there if you do get hired
gun control + no people control = commiefornia
gun control + people control = orwells wet dream
no gun control + no people control = ancapistan
no gun control + individual people control = 'MERICA
(No gun control + collective people control = switzerland idfk)
sometimes I think relationships might be worth trying but then I consider the fact that 70% of no fault divorces are started by women (that beg and plead you buy them all the fanciest things before you're even supposed to spend 5 figures on a shiny piece of compressed carbon for the purpose of virtue signaling how great being in chains in secular marriage is supposed to be)
to only end with her whining to the cops the moment you can give the thirsty bitch her dick or cant pay for all of her shit otherwise, having you arrested put you in a kangaroo court that subscribes to the dulith model that automatically convicts you (due to the fact youre a man no less), raping your wallet for alimony and child support payments as she drives away with your car dwells in your house and fucks every tyrone and chad on your shitty neighborhood as any kids in the relationship suffer from neglect and emotional abuse and turn into SJWs so they can ride the authoritarian cuck carousel of handouts and submission for the rest of their sad pathetic lives as you rot in jail for her stupid fucking lies and materialism...
so I then come to my senses, stay single, and keep my dick out of crazy ๐ (the majority of) bitches aint shit but hoes n tricks; and they can come and suck me off if they really need me in their decadent lives for all I care anymore
and yeah I get there are individuals that dont do any of what I said, but those individuals if they have any self respect and sense wouldnt get into politics and would rather get into actually doing something that doesnt involve being a self absorbed humanist cultist prick
well first off this isnt math, and second off this isnt history; this is an assessment of the way things are; gun stats in the US outside of inner cities will back this up
id love to see how
well either way id bet the orwellian dictators wouldnt fancy gun rights
let alone any but to clarify I meant the fact that "individuals" I would imagine as (the majority of) gun owners that dont play pumped up kicks every time they get bullied and go on a shooting spree and actually respect their weapon enough to use it only when they would need to (for self defense against an authoritarian govt etc)
besides the fact that those trying to push for gun control miss the fact that the authorities often times stage drills in areas not long before a supposed "event" occurs too...
and even if those events are real; is banning guns really gonna stop someone hellbent on hurting someone else? europe deals with every other type of violence yet doesnt go around banning trucks and (at least the majority of) kitchen utensils ffs
if I were to presuppose why it is its because humanists and those that want to rid humanity of all their responsibility and objectivity through SJW doctrine (in their vain attempts to make a need for a savior obsolete) dont wanna admit the fact that people are capable as just as much evil as they are good, and we have a class of dishonest narccisists that want to indoctrinate the world on the basis of liberal tenets (one of those being that humanity is somehow intrinsically good, regardless of wheter nature depicts this, hence why they try so hard to censor and hide whats real)
laws or restrictions on the right to bear arms
well if it isnt a means of usurping individual rights to defend oneself in a public setting I guess I dont
yet id bet they wouldnt bother with background checking politicians for ties to the same forces they pretend to "rally the people" against, its pathetic watching the charade and responsibility shifting really
really? because I thought we were talking about the need for background checks...
and thats fine but at the end of the day its just paper with fancy writing on it made by elitists that probably care about their paychecks and power more than they do children's well being unequivocally
legitimized by threat of force upon non complicance like the protection racket it really truly is
my point is I dont see it wise to put my well being and the well being of people I love into the hands of laws that can be changed and amended to suit the aims of those that would see them dead... and you shouldn't either
besides the fact that values etc do way more to influence people and things more than one would imagine... scared me at first but im not even surprised at all anymore
since when are intentionalistically held values merely words?
in the functional sense yes, but insofar as them being quantum probabilities (which exist as energy waveforms, as they have been proven to be by empirical science) id think not...
you dont have to, I guess its just my opinion but if the quantum world precipitated the physical world and not the other way around it would make sense of a lot more than people are willing to to say the least
highly unlikely that this experiment concludes an imminent universal origin but as good of a presupposition as yours
yes where "reality" as we understand it practically ceases to exist; "why" is the question
never said it did, but the interference pattern made by electrons as the default actions on part of those actions suggests that matter acts as a wave (energy) as supposed to particulates (matter)
not purely but go on...
because by any sort of empirical observation "reality" is (at first glance) an unmoving continuum as defined by natural and/plus universal law, which includes ones that define physical processes...
nice presupposition but id think im at least smart enough to not know cells are x^100 number of times bigger than anything quantum or even atomic (and thus from a material POV, already were "probabilized" into existance, at the quantum level) but k den
Combine that witht the fact that the universe ostensibly originated from a very very small point and you have no less than a definitive, scientifically backed idealism
im sure it is ๐
*HuRr DuRr GeNe EdItInG aNd GmO iS nEaRlY FoOlPrOoF AnD nOt dAnGeRoUs*
Youd be surprised lol
> "reddit approved mods"
1984 wasnt a sci fi book it was a prophecy book
I mean id hope it would be but in skeptical as to whether common knolwedge is really as common as it should be... Idk
And yes i know laws are intrinsically (without martial and judicial backing) only hyper formalized recommendation letters on behalf of thine self appointed demigods known as politicians to begin with , seeing as said politicians seem to love breaking them also ๐
(both the leftists and rightists i should add)
517 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 5/6
| Next