did 2 years in college for computer networking, the best I got for work is as an HVAC tech

least I know how to use google like a master

jesus

but yeah I'm good with google, not a furry

they're interesting, never messed with them personally

I do see them all the time at work though, working for towers like ATT and comcast keeping their server rooms cooled

very interesting and somewhat scary

yeah I never mastered soldering

built my own desktop though I went overboard and used my ETS money

anyways yeah, these "Niche groups" like furries and bronies are pretty damn left leaning, discussed how groups like BLM just walked over 30 bodies to achieve their goals and thought it was counter productive and was acccused of internalized racism

no one cares to be honest I tried saying "Riots bad" in reddit and was explained that all progressive movments had riots

"Even the revolution had tarring and feathering."

even managed to get them to say that MLK wasn't an influential figure in the civil rights movement

this point I'm convinced you could get them to denounce anyone as long as you can bring up stuff they said or did that contradicts their world view

I'm curious about how far one can go

it's a rule of the internets. if it exists the furries will furify it

or the bronies

any community someone touches it eventually

all of them have an even balance of good, to okay to absolute cringe

I ... I have no idea I want to say no but there's no telling

normal Furries?

thought the idea of furries itself was abnormal

same with any group that identifies as something and has Sonas that they dress up as or draw fan art of themselves as

hell I'm a brony and consider the concept abnormal

if it's illegal then lock me up

https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/05/politics/kamala-harris-not-trust-trump-vaccine-cnntv/index.html

I need some help with something

is veteran's assistance almost exclusively a US thing?

> @Tel Locus What questions do you have about it?
@LizardLick

Mainly if foriegn governments have something similar to the VA with housing and job placement

EU systems specifically,

oucch

a new lawsuit looks like it could bring up some interesting consequences about memes posted by Trump

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=nelBVWjflm3l6A1p1g1Y2A==&system=prod

honestly unless the supreme court of New York is highly asinine (not holding my breath)

it could result in the precedence defining fair use with memes

they can't violate the first amendment but the rub becomes an issue of licensing and memes

pretty much what will need to be argued and hard

and the original video wasn't public domain

was licensed by Junkin media

it's their parents, either that or they lied on official court documents

in which case that's a big ol perjury violation

the court filing says that it's the parents of the children

if it's not the parents of the children then that's perjury

the parents licensed the video through Junkin media which means it's viable to be licensed for advertisement

point is the parents of the children have to be the parents are filing a copyright/licensing issue against Trump and a memer and calling it a Civil rights issue.

they're arguing because it's posted by the trump campaign it's an ad

well the video supposedly is around a year old

yeah the news videos are showing sept 11 2019,

https://www.jukinmedia.com/licensing/view/1067960

date posted 09 SEP 2019

and that's also when it's licensed

date the video was supposedly made is september 9th, september 10th it was licensed and september 11th news stories were made about it

yeah I can't find any videos of these kids older than september 2019

it's New York

got a september 21st 2019 interview with the children

they're still 20+ months

unless they are using child actors at that interview, (it is CNN)

pretty much

and the point I'm making is that the video is less than a year old and they're going to try and argue licensing and copyright as well as "emotional damages"

and sue Trump campaign and a memer over the edited video

need the butthurt report for them

http://www.youtube.com/shorts/PFZeVQVjOho

my favorite ruling was the Bill Clinton impeachment trial

Perjury isn't an impeachable offense

basically, clinton's impeachment was for lying under oath, that whole "I did not have sex with that woman." thing

oh well I'm reading the senate records.

The President was not obligated to appear before the grand
jury, but if he chose to do so, he was obligated to tell the complete
truth.

this is their reasoning

because of that he was not obligated to tell the truth, They acknowledge that everything he said was misleading and false but not perjerous

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/1999/2/23/senate-section/article/S1791-1

here's the records

corn pop is kind of an odd name

yeah

if there was an absolute tie it would be decided by the house and the VP decided by the Senate meanwhile the speaker of the house would be the acting pres

I think the Dems are banking HARD that they keep the house and retake the Senate

so they can push through some BS legislation

he smoked Weed with a state supreme court judge's nephew

yeah had to correct that

sorry, am typing with half a mason jar of watermelon shine

and about 5 months dry

need a name for an NPC

a Half Orc Captain of the Guard

Was told Grunch Bly was too on the nose

that was taken

imagine the chat tonight

Maybe I can find a way to use Corn Pop

odd they're saying 8|7c

when the timeslot was 9

the DNC music video?

can't wait

need to set up a timer

any place to talk DnD

Blair White was a man

Heres the indictment papers for netflix

looks like it'll target the higher managment

yeah, bottom looks to be that the CEO and the Chief exec officer are listed as representatives of Netflix, if this goes to a court they'd have to answer for what's going on

also PC 43.262 is worded perfectly for what's going on.

(d) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the depicted child consented to the creation of the visual material.

Given the Grand jury found that Cuties has no artistic value, they have no outs with that code. Not sure what would happen in terms of a punishment

apparently there is precedence for an indictment across states and targeting a company. Using a 2000 indictment from CA against a TX company the Executives listed in the indictment will stand trial against the indictment

And they'll most likely face heavy fines or jail time