https://notthebee.com/article/a-detroit-guy-dukes-of-hazzarded-his-car-over-an-open-drawbridge

Chad driver

<:salut:730846445732888630>

@Soulman I actually feel pity for these mentally unstable people....

a new lawsuit looks like it could bring up some interesting consequences about memes posted by Trump

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=nelBVWjflm3l6A1p1g1Y2A==&system=prod

ya...they're trying to censor memes or fairuse and free speech

honestly unless the supreme court of New York is highly asinine (not holding my breath)

it could result in the precedence defining fair use with memes

sc of ny can't violate us constitution ...they can't go against the bill of rights

if they did, they'd become the dictatorship which will result in their recall by the masses of the state

they can't violate the first amendment but the rub becomes an issue of licensing and memes

well fair use is fair use

fair use is public domain content

pretty much what will need to be argued and hard

and the original video wasn't public domain

was licensed by Junkin media

i find it ironic that the kids in the original media aren't in the protest against the meme

it's ppl claiming to be the parents

considering the source content media which the kids are in just so happen to be the same age the 'parents' in the complaint just so happen to be ...

it's their parents, either that or they lied on official court documents

in which case that's a big ol perjury violation

well the source video is at least 20-40yrs old

the court filing says that it's the parents of the children

and the parents look like they're the same age as the the kids would be now

if it's not the parents of the children then that's perjury

if they were foster parents..then it opens up a whole new ball of wax

like was the vid done by the parents consent but not by the foster parents consent

and why was the kids in foster care to begin with

the parents licensed the video through Junkin media which means it's viable to be licensed for advertisement

sorry, brain wanders alot when into several discussions at the same time

point is the parents of the children have to be the parents are filing a copyright/licensing issue against Trump and a memer and calling it a Civil rights issue.

if no profit is to be made nor the made of intent of the meme use of the ad source video, then it's not in violation of licensing imho

they're arguing because it's posted by the trump campaign it's an ad

well either way, it's bait and trap of fair use content...and how long was the license for the media ad co

was it for life, or just for the selected ads used

well the video supposedly is around a year old

most licensed content is limited use license ..either limited by the ad agency, by the source suppliers or by the time limit involved ...it's like comparing old content ads from 30-80yrs ago and declaring it an icon because somebody remembers it or repurposes it

yeah the news videos are showing sept 11 2019,

the vid is way older

look at the cars