Property is theft.

Ancaps are neofeudalist in Disguise.

Allah is the only one I need

Yes @UWU

Goo for them

Good*

Yes

Well these feelings need to come from within and not from others. And that’s where most people fall short.

What you advocate for in essence is a rejection of anarchist principles. For these corporate feudal lords.

Well no that’s a monarchy

@run 120 minutes lose 120 pounds ok but my point still stands. It seeks to establish the power structure of the old world.

That’s just false

You are stating these things are true because they are the current state of offers. But you fail to understand the power of localized direction action.

Donald trump is a joke

You don’t understand what the state truly is. The state in essence is a bureaucratic body the alienates the populas with its exclusion of the public from its affairs. Opting for this representation of the masses through corporate sponsored politicians. Anarchism isn’t with a government that is not only a strawman of anarchism but also a relic from the old world powers of the European continent. You sit here and act as if you profess this incredible knowledge on anarchism and how it’s flawed yet your only argument is propaganda from the old world monarchies.

Don’t be dishonest but what did I expect from a proto Nazi

Not really but thanks @DANKMEMER GOD

You mean the same concept that most sociologist would agree with. You seem to be stuck on this infantile understand of anarchism and then you use that to characterize you’re belief of such. So what’s the point of debating you if you’re going to be dishonest and use ad hominem arguments to prove your point.

It seems you all have an infantile understanding of communism that can be traced to American propaganda to shut down workers self management. Communism is a Stateless classes society in which the workers own the means of production.

Whoa there buddy that wasn’t your point a second ago. You are not going to pivot to something else because you can’t defend this point. You maid the claim you need a state to organize people which is just false. Then I called you out for you infantile understanding of anarchism which is pretty apparent when you ignore all of the anarchist collectives that have existed. Your Analysis is lacking both class and power structures that is why it amounts to a rejection of liberalism in favor of a totalitarian etho state.

You are being dishonest now. You say you’re a Nazi I point out how you’re wrong about anarchism while describing your political beliefs to you for you only to say I don’t believe in x y and z like fuck off. You’re blatantly looking for a way out. Either be honest or don’t respond.

> Can someone here please explain why they are racist? It truly makes no sense to me why you would be disrespectful to someone over skin color.


It’s because they lack any compassion for anyone but there group and use it as an exclusionary tactic to keep the groups apart. But the issue is societal pillars that propagate racism and bigotry to keep the masses fighting amongst themselves while they steal your labor value.

@censorshiq

> bro I worked at Walmart in the hood. That job lowkey made me racist.
@Synthetic Aesthetic one dose not simply become racist from working a job. You have learned these things beliefs to coincide with your ideology. This is nothing more than a pathetic excuse for you’re action s

> You're not racist stop psychoanalyzing people
@run 120 minutes lose 120 pounds one it’s an analysis of class and power structures two it’s sociology not psychology. Lastly you’re a dishonest shit like I really don’t want to destroy you again so you can backpedal to some bullshit claim.

Claims I a pseudo yet acts like he understands anarchism without reading any of its texts.

No you claimed to be a Nazi

I described the view points of Nazis

You got mad

Backpedaled

Then claimed I lost

The decision we where having was on the difference between a state and a governing body. You claimed to be a Nazi so I pointed out the fact that you believe in x y and z because that’s what the ideology is. Then you proceeded to get upset and backpedal by saying I don’t believe in x y or z. You are the definition of dishonest like fuck off calling me a pseudo. When your whole ideology is based of bullshit pseudo race science. Like fuck outta here social Darwin looking ass.

> Lmao, I work delivery that runs to the ghetto, gave me a solid chunk of conditioning regarding black people, saying it doesn't affect my perception in noticeable ways would be lying
@Soup Can Sam

I never said they didn’t make an impression on you. But you shouldn’t use personal anecdotes to label a whole group.

> Usually if someone says "delivery makes you racist" it's facetious.
@Cobra Commander
Regardless of there intend they are still propagating this system that keep these communities marginalized.

> Right but you simply accused the other person of using experiences of a walmart to justify latent racism which is kinda bullshit based on that one comment. I don't have any other context for this person but that was a really severe response that was only maybe half true?
@Soup Can Sam
Regardless of what they might feel. There actions speak louder than words. So the impression they gave of was an excuse for there racist behavior.

> Oh now we're onto "jokes support systems that oppress people" when the direct result of humor is to absurdify the ideas being presented
@Soup Can Sam

Like you agree with me words have power correct. So if we look at this through a historical lenses you realize what this is actually doing. Like you wouldn’t claim minstrel shows aren’t racist. So why apply the logic here? It’s like saying it’s just a prank bro when you clearly have alternative motives.

> It also justifies categorizing speech as violence which it is inherently not.
@Soup Can Sam

So like hypothetically if I where to threaten to kill you. It would be no violent your logic is Flawed.

Are you dense

If I where to threaten someone it is a call to violence

That’s a strawman of my point

And bye lol

I mean it is

That wasn’t my point

Using slurs isn’t a joke they propagate stereotypes that exist only to server those in power.

Like I’ve explained my points already

Yet you continue to strawman my points

I’m not white but ok

You’re act as if there is this imaginary conflation between what calls of violence and actual violence. When they are one in the same these are mutual exclusive terms and to act different is just ignorant to any sense of the law.

My point was very clear I don’t know how you ass couldn’t get it. Actual violence and calls for violence are mutually exclusive terms. And to act otherwise is dishonest and ignorant to any form of law.

Like I don’t understand how you can’t grasp this very simple concept

You act as if I’m pissed or something. I’ve explained myself to you countless times now. My position hasn’t changed. Calls for violence and acts of violence are the one in the same while you act as if they are mutually exclusive. When that’s simply not the case you can’t separate the actions form then intend to do that action.

Tbh America should be bombed

Wdym by who

The intent still hasn’t changed

Weather you act or not is up to you

The intent to do the action is still there

Ok but that doesn’t mean anything

Just because x happens doesn’t mean it’s ok for it to happen

What are you on about

You are redefining my position so you can pidgin hole me into this easy beat down.

When you say racist jokes you are racist

Not that hard of a concept

Yet you try and justify your actions

Why would you need nuance when you put down a marginalized group for a joke

Yes just suck it up

Because everyone should kiss my ass

Like fuck off kid

How did I avoid the argument

It doesn’t matter

Like if I say the n word as a joke or not it’s still used in a way to put down another race. Like it’s not that hard

You mean Istanbul

If you claim it to be Constantinople you have some real attachment issues

But it’s sad

Bomb America

Chechnya 💯

Because viva Chechnya my homeland. @Che Havill

You cannot assert your ideology as the state of nature when it’s only existed for 200 years. Furthermore what don’t you understand in this hypothetical society you will be a self to the corporation without any autonomy.