We’ll shine constant light on the container the amount it radiates equals the amount it gains after a while

You can do this experiment yourself. Get a jar start with just air shine a light on it measure the temperature after a while it will reach and equilibrium. Slowly increase the co2 concentrations and see how the equilibrium changes. @Downfall Vision these changes aren’t going to change the temperature as much as changing this equilibrium point

Sure having living organisms fuck up the equilibrium point they will increase the co2 levels and decrease.

Them

Nope

It’s shows that co2 changes the equilibrium point

Other factors changing the co2 levels fucking up the equilibrium doesn’t change this fact

Yes but it’s impractical

@Downfall Vision the problem is with the artificial gain in co2 plant growth isn’t able to keep up with it. That’s why co2 levels continue to grow

@Downfall Vision think about all the eco refugees that will come to your country

well that doesn’t matter because you don’t own the country

I mean if you want to avoid eco refugees lowering co2 level is the way to go

Waaaay more refugees like you think the Syrian refugee crisis is bad. Climate imagine what would happen if famines spread across all Africa and South America

@oojimaflip let’s say you have a bucket with a hole in the bottom. You are putting water in and water comes out. The water goes up to almost the lid. This bucket is at an equilibrium same amount of water leaves as enters . Then you increase the water flow my 3% what happens

No

I’m saying

You are saying what what ever percent of carbon dioxide

Humans create is small

Right?

Compared to the whole ecosystem

Sure

You are saying humans create 3% this number is really small so how can it create an increase in co2

But I’m saying

In the bucket case

If the system is at equilibrium and you increase the flow by just 3% water in the bucket will increase

Why is it a bad analogy it shows such a small percentage of 3 can fuck over an equilibrium system. Systems in the environment remove co2 and add co2 then humans come along then add 3% more carbon dioxide. Well guess what your equilibrium system is fucked. The water is going to rise. Just like we see co2 concentrations rise in the environment

It’s actually a great analogy in my opinion

No

I am not saying it’s the same as the earth atmosphere I am disputing your claim that is basically humans create 3% this number is small why would it effect the system as a whole

It’s kind of a beautiful analogy

Yes

But you are saying this number is insignificant right?

Okay just like the bucket

3% flow of water increase seems insignificant

But

In an equilibrium system 3% increase can fuck it over

The 97% is just flows out the hole.

Yup

Okay

So in the bucket situation you think increasing the input flow by 3% will cause nothing to happen because it’s an insignificant number? @oojimaflip

No answer the question

Will it

Or will it not

Dude it’s just a simple hypothetical

If you believe in Allah put this on 5 discord server. Don't just ignore this because it says in the Quran if you deny him, he will deny you in front of his son in the gates of paradise. This is the simplest test. If you love Allah and you are not ashamed of it, copy and paste this image on 5 discord server

https://twitter.com/Sean_McDowell/status/1153764522403872769

Why would you want cannabis infused lubricants

It probably smells like shit

And doesn’t get you high

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/337625987053387776/641312360149155850/Shut_The_Hell_Up_Confederate.mp4

https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/284828648056422401/647302777688555524/video0-6.mp4

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/284828648056422401/647356661916368909/fwwfe.jpg

Can you guys do this

@BasedChris god and you say you are part of the superior race mate

you cant solve this

you arent in the 5%

you sure

there are a infinite amount of whole positive numbers

@BasedChris you have division

4,000,000,000‬/1,000,000,000

=4

so has infinite amount of solutions

ezpz then

there is a solution

infinite amount of solutions

infact

general case computer solve algorthims cant solve it

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11

and so on

i cant tell you im in the 5% club

no

if there is a infinite amount of solutions

probably one is positive and whole

but i know there is defintly a positive and whole value

for this solution

people have done it before

do you not know gradient math @You feel safe with an account

i got really close with solving it with computers but because there is so many converges computers have a really hard time

using fmin search with matlab

i got to like

@Branky https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/647785878080454656/image0.jpg

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/538705861678333982/651595138652438560/NUT.mp4

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/568512474588905509/656194795542282242/image0-8.gif

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/284828648056422401/656337040605970434/79756894_2320186184759912_7721695322342162432_o.png?width=720&height=687

merry christmas jfg chat

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/284828648056422401/656828893369729035/image0.gif

https://cdn.monochromium.games/idk.png

https://cdn.monochromium.games/idk.png

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/522905901003178007/659789332541997084/oi_michael.mp4