Message from @johny1846

Discord ID: 637318161926193182


2019-10-25 15:44:38 UTC  

Changing co2 changes this

2019-10-25 15:45:05 UTC  

Allowing for more energy to stay to a point till more energy starts to leave

2019-10-25 15:45:27 UTC  

So the temperature is higher

2019-10-25 15:45:47 UTC  

if you continually heat a gas in a container, does it reach an equilibrium, or does it get so hot the pressure increases to the point where the jar explodes?

2019-10-25 15:45:51 UTC  

😂

2019-10-25 15:46:28 UTC  

@johny1846 The earth's atmosphere is not a closed system

2019-10-25 15:46:39 UTC  

We’ll shine constant light on the container the amount it radiates equals the amount it gains after a while

2019-10-25 15:47:06 UTC  

gasses, heat, light etc. all escape the atmosphere

2019-10-25 15:47:45 UTC  

I'm done here, it's impossible to debate with someone who is ideologically possessed

2019-10-25 15:50:09 UTC  

You can do this experiment yourself. Get a jar start with just air shine a light on it measure the temperature after a while it will reach and equilibrium. Slowly increase the co2 concentrations and see how the equilibrium changes. @Downfall Vision these changes aren’t going to change the temperature as much as changing this equilibrium point

2019-10-25 15:51:19 UTC  

"A light" is not equatable to our Sun! FFS

2019-10-25 15:52:11 UTC  

im going to put the jar into a fire

2019-10-25 15:52:30 UTC  

along with this debate

2019-10-25 15:52:32 UTC  

@johny1846 if you then put in some living organisms which soak up CO2 and exhaust Oxygen what happens?

2019-10-25 15:53:02 UTC  

also what control measures are in place for this "experiment"?

2019-10-25 15:53:24 UTC  

how can you be sure that the light level coming from the light to the jar is comparable to the light coming from our sun to earth?

2019-10-25 15:54:13 UTC  

Sure having living organisms fuck up the equilibrium point they will increase the co2 levels and decrease.

2019-10-25 15:54:20 UTC  

Them

2019-10-25 15:54:34 UTC  

So your experiment is meaningless in terms of earth's climate

2019-10-25 15:54:39 UTC  

Nope

2019-10-25 15:54:50 UTC  

It’s shows that co2 changes the equilibrium point

2019-10-25 15:54:55 UTC  

okay

2019-10-25 15:54:57 UTC  

so what?

2019-10-25 15:55:13 UTC  

that doesn't prove that we are heading towards a climate crisis

2019-10-25 15:55:30 UTC  

Other factors changing the co2 levels fucking up the equilibrium doesn’t change this fact

2019-10-25 15:55:34 UTC  

it just proves that CO2 will contribute to the overall temperature of the earth, just like many other elements will

2019-10-25 15:55:42 UTC  

We need the climate crisis because it will makes things colder which means the blacks while move out

2019-10-25 15:56:08 UTC  

@johny1846 if we removed CO2 from the atmosphere at a high enough rate, wouldn't this end the climate change crisis you're expecting?

2019-10-25 15:56:20 UTC  

Yes but it’s impractical

2019-10-25 15:56:41 UTC  

why is it impractical? It's happened before

2019-10-25 15:56:52 UTC  

atmospheric CO2 at less than 300ppm will be adverse to plant growth

2019-10-25 15:56:57 UTC  

The earth has had very high CO2 levels in the atmosphere in the past

2019-10-25 15:57:05 UTC  

and without human technology it has decreased

2019-10-25 15:57:35 UTC  

We even observe an increase in plant growth on earth in our lifetimes

2019-10-25 15:57:42 UTC  

we are in a carbon drought right now

2019-10-25 15:57:59 UTC  

why is it a crisis?

2019-10-25 15:58:03 UTC  

is it worse than other things?

2019-10-25 15:58:05 UTC  

how?

2019-10-25 15:58:34 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634548436280016906/637319100397256704/1.png

2019-10-25 15:58:39 UTC  

if this is to be believed

2019-10-25 15:58:40 UTC  

@Downfall Vision the problem is with the artificial gain in co2 plant growth isn’t able to keep up with it. That’s why co2 levels continue to grow