Changing co2 changes this

Allowing for more energy to stay to a point till more energy starts to leave

So the temperature is higher

if you continually heat a gas in a container, does it reach an equilibrium, or does it get so hot the pressure increases to the point where the jar explodes?

😂

@johny1846 The earth's atmosphere is not a closed system

We’ll shine constant light on the container the amount it radiates equals the amount it gains after a while

gasses, heat, light etc. all escape the atmosphere

I'm done here, it's impossible to debate with someone who is ideologically possessed

You can do this experiment yourself. Get a jar start with just air shine a light on it measure the temperature after a while it will reach and equilibrium. Slowly increase the co2 concentrations and see how the equilibrium changes. @Downfall Vision these changes aren’t going to change the temperature as much as changing this equilibrium point

"A light" is not equatable to our Sun! FFS

im going to put the jar into a fire

along with this debate

@johny1846 if you then put in some living organisms which soak up CO2 and exhaust Oxygen what happens?

also what control measures are in place for this "experiment"?

how can you be sure that the light level coming from the light to the jar is comparable to the light coming from our sun to earth?

Sure having living organisms fuck up the equilibrium point they will increase the co2 levels and decrease.

Them

So your experiment is meaningless in terms of earth's climate

Nope

It’s shows that co2 changes the equilibrium point

okay

so what?

that doesn't prove that we are heading towards a climate crisis

Other factors changing the co2 levels fucking up the equilibrium doesn’t change this fact

it just proves that CO2 will contribute to the overall temperature of the earth, just like many other elements will

We need the climate crisis because it will makes things colder which means the blacks while move out

@johny1846 if we removed CO2 from the atmosphere at a high enough rate, wouldn't this end the climate change crisis you're expecting?

Yes but it’s impractical

why is it impractical? It's happened before

atmospheric CO2 at less than 300ppm will be adverse to plant growth

The earth has had very high CO2 levels in the atmosphere in the past

and without human technology it has decreased

We even observe an increase in plant growth on earth in our lifetimes

we are in a carbon drought right now

why is it a crisis?

is it worse than other things?

how?

if this is to be believed

@Downfall Vision the problem is with the artificial gain in co2 plant growth isn’t able to keep up with it. That’s why co2 levels continue to grow