Hello 😄

Wasn't Khruschev somewhat reasonable compared to... the others?

Cubism is an art style championed by Pablo Picasso

<:facepalm:508484035274735665>

Are you actually separate people?

Looks more like the same person picked those images, so probably not separate people

Just a wild guess

@Bee Do you consider yourself anti-semitic? You seem to make nonsensical references to Jews

Okay, so, well, why?

Who influence politics negatively, and whose politics exactly?

@Bee What lead you to think that way? It's not true

@Bee Have you considered the possibility you might not be connecting dots adeptly?

Putinism, far-right movement, conspiracy theories, disinformation, anti-semitism are connected dots. Russian trollfarms push far-right propaganda and disinformation.

There's an attempt to hijack nationalist sentiments under the umbrella of "national socialism"

It's been in the news, @Orwell

@Bee And how would you know that?

Reference to your previous statement

This server seems like a gateway for attempting to influence opinion of others to swing towards the more extreme positions

I'm curious about how this thing works. I thought this was a reasonable server, but it seems to have been just a facade for disinformation

@Bearer Of The Curse With server I refer to well staff

@Xinyue It's also irrational

@Bee It's pointless to even pay attention to the religion of a person in this context

Obviously Israel is one of the key allies of the United States and there's all kinds of co-operation that we're mostly unaware of. The fact you just add the word "jewish" into that connection, shows faulty reasoning

No?

Nope

Judaism is a religion

And also the whole concept of "race" is highly dubious, but of course someone so ignorant as to push disinformation willingly is probably uncapable of seeing that

@Bee I'm not surprised someone on your level finds it funny 😄

Climate change is a phenomenon that is being investigated scientifically. By people who are considerably more capable than you're.

That doesn't follow @Bearer Of The Curse

@Bee That's not hypocritical, but then you wouldn't know anything about that

People used to think the way you do, it was mainstream in the 19th century. Since then serious scientists don't feel any need to think that way. it's been debunked a 100 years ago

@Bee And since you probably don't know, 19th century means the years between year 1800 and 1900

@Bee That's pretty much what I'd expect someone from your caliber

incompetent

@Bearer Of The Curse What sense does that make?

@Bearer Of The Curse Your logic is faulty

You're trying to use the national level interactions between countries as a heuristic that would determine what scientists really believe, and then trying to turn the case so that because China associates with pollution, if climate change was real, then these countries supposedly would be doing more to influence China. But that argument doesn't make sense. Although someone who is distrustful of the society in general might find that a bit compelling, it's important to note that it's not based on realistic assumptions of how interactions between countries actually take place.

@εïз irma εïз Wow you're so capable.

@εïз irma εïз Awesome. Is that all you have? Go back to your cave.

@The Big Oof The problem is that you're obviously intellectually inferior, so you're not going convert me. Any innocent bystander can determine this being the state of affairs simply by following our interactions. Meanwhile you'll continue to appear as the ridiculous dimwits you're. 😄

Is that your objective interpretation of how the hostility of these interactions escalated? I'm not surprised by it's infactuality

I would never post something so degenerate as that 😄

Of course that's obvious to everyone who witnesses this anyway. 😄

Even @The Big Oof realizes that deep in his heart.

@εïз irma εïз At least you're trying now

@εïз irma εïз A couple of iterations and you might actually start making sense

@εïз irma εïз But then you fall back your default degenerate mode 😄

@The Big Oof Was there something you tried to say? I'll reply if you come up with an argument

Not really a libertarian. Why so?

Right.. Sure you're basically trying to elevate yourself above the conversations by seeing the "opposition" as some sort of a category, so you don't actually need to work out what's going on and think there exists a shortcut that allows simplifying the complexity about, so you can deal with it.

Whether or not you're doing that *intentionally* is not yet clear, although it's highly likely @The Big Oof

@εïз irma εïз Did you try to communicate? 😄

@Bee Beautiful reasoning right there. I think that's the best you can do, so don't feel bad about it.

Discord is used a lot by adolescents

I'm paranoid? Wow.

I find that highly ironic after seeing people push some sort of anti-semitic conspiracy propaganda

There you go..

@εïз irma εïз Coming from you I'm not surprised in the least. Is that really relevant way to look at things in the world inside your mind? 😄

@Xinyue So what's "JQ" stand for?

@The Big Oof Actually this was reported by Bellingcat, and also far-right extremists seem to think so themselves quite often. Of course they're varied in their.. beliefs.

@The Big Oof For an example you're advertising a another server in the partnerships with Nazi-Germany insignia and aesthetics. Also given that all the staff seem to share that they're pushing this disinformation narrative, it's pretty obvious that's what this server ends up being, whether or not it's intentional

@The Big Oof Reading quality articles is a pretty good way of gathering information. But of course over here people were already linking RT videos so, it's probably hopless.

@Bee That image probably depicts your internal view of the outside world more accurately than anything else, since you're incapable of seeing the world properly

@Orwell The fact that RT pushes low quality propaganda is trivial

But then I guess you can't point out to what information is trivial and what isn't in the company of people who are obviously processing information with serious defects

@Deleted User More like factually correct and delusional

@The Big Oof I wouldn't not be surprised if you ended up removing me, especially when that's the only way you can hold your ground here. 😄

@The Big Oof Right, you can comfort yourself by looking at things that way

@The Big Oof And maybe the sycophants will bolster you

@Bearer Of The Curse The topic is a highly complex scientific argumetn which involves finding out what's the equilibrium temperature of the system given a set of parameters, which are numerous and pretty much impossible to cover for a layman. But then you have scientists in universities around the world specializing on the field, you have top scientists in NASA for an example who are look at the math and physics about global warming. But of course you're trying to make the argument that these people "really" don't think there's a problem, or something along those lines, trying to change superficial interpretation of the social level here.

@Bearer Of The Curse You might think you're handling this issue correctly by reiterating the name of some argumentation fallacy from wikipedia. But of course your premise that it applies to this situation is false, but what else can we expect from you anyway.

@Bearer Of The Curse Do you want to attempt to argue the science of global warming then?

@Bearer Of The Curse I'm not expecting you to have any of the required skills though

@εïз irma εïз Are you trying to communicate something over there? 😄

*An