Ornament
Discord ID: 314475701858205707
201 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/3
| Next
He is a future millionaire. He just got unlucky for a moment.
@Deleted User It is not.
@Deleted User they embrace social-democracy and follow oligarchy. Like their Greek friends.
Good thing nazi lost due to their systematical failures.
@OF-8 What books of Marx did you read?
@OF-8 Secondary sources merchanting you, brother. Read first hand information.
@OF-8 If you never read first hand info you never know really. You can't make your own criticism
@OF-8 Which books did you read?
@OF-8 You forgot the name of the book you've read?
Lets find out the book name. What was it about?
@OF-8 I'm asking you a question
@OF-8 Was it about philosophy or economy?
@OF-8 what is the organic composition of the capital?
@OF-8 what is surplus capital, where it comes from?
@OF-8 can surplus capital be gained through trade?
@OF-8 You don't have an ability to read long books, do you? You have to get refined info from low-key sources.
That is the reason you cannot criticize yourself.
@OF-8 I want a correct answer.
@OF-8 to Marx
@OF-8 If you don't read it you will always have to follow your low-key refined propaganda
You have to read books yourself
@OF-8 Theory
@OF-8 I've read Main Kampf and other nationalist books. I'm able to read them. Nationalists can't do the same
That is why we are going to annihilate them.
@OF-8 after reading you have to remember it. To think about it.
@OF-8 If you don't remember a book, you have to re-read.
@OF-8 pick the right one.
@OF-8 Anti-During by Engels describes most Marxist views outside of Capital.
Its not too long.
@OF-8 Engels considered as a classical Marxist source.
@OF-8 Its Capital and anti-During. First major works outside of more pure philosophy
@OF-8 Its hard to read Marx for people who hardly can read books. Start with Engels or Stalin. In fact Stalin and Mao wrote for proletariat on their level.
So you might have a chance
Even your racist friend could read it.
>able to read books
Financial capital does not depends on production anymore.
Production depends on financial capital.
@OF-8 Financial capital are Banks, Trade, Investment, international trade, war.
@OF-8 Lenin argued that the time of Production Capital is gone. And now is the time of Financial Capital free from production or country
@OF-8 Ask a Marxist on Marxism.
Ask a doctor on health.
@OF-8 Would you ask a homeless without a profession or education on a street advise on your health?
@OF-8 Yes, Marxism is a true science. Marxism is defined as materialism.
@OF-8 If you want to use one word to define Marxism its: "Materialism" - Lenin
@OF-8 Marx studies whole society of his time and writes a book called "Capital".
Because society is defined by Capital
@OF-8 Capital is still there. Believe it or not.
@Deleted User Subjectivity can equal objectivity in our case. Even very poor and not well studied. The theory brings us closer even if not too much. One who fights imperialism all his life is an anti-imperialist. USSR was more anti-imperialist than anybody else in history.
Same way Cuba was not very socialist, but anti-imperialist.
@petit bourgeois it can't
@petit bourgeois Cuba doesn't have economy to be socialist
@petit bourgeois They are not self-sufficient.
@Deleted User I support dialectical equality of imperialism and anti-imperialism. Anti-imperialism may look like imperialism, but it is not. It is the opposite.
@Deleted User I agree on your extension.
@Deleted User that is going too far.
@Deleted User Ignorance is a bliss.
@Deleted User You want to make people completely unhappy?
@Deleted User Most people will go crazy in such a system. The educational system shall not be militarized. More freedom is necessary for personal development.
@Deleted User Majority will not accept that.
@Deleted User It will. I hope it is on my side.
Free time is the greatest value for proletariat. You can do literally anything and evolve faster.
@Deleted User It is not about happiness it is about progress
@Deleted User it is not preconception. I see it happening everyday. It is a great advantage to have free time.
@Deleted User anything.
@Deleted User yes. To grow as a subject
@Deleted User in a sovereign way
@Deleted User Fast evolution.
Thinking process is the best
@Deleted User it doesn't say the other way. Both objective and subjective is present. And there is ways to be on each side. And in the middle. Or anywhere. Both ways are working. You can carefully direct in both ways. Science says it.
@Deleted User Idle is not so very idle. More thought is present after accumulating free time. Every subject learns faster and use it for its development. There is a combination of social freedoms and authoritarian government. The subjectivity must grow for a developed consciousness. It is best for whole society.
You abstract yourself from developments without certain liberties.
@Deleted User Why would one or the other way be prevalent? For which purpose? Two ways is better than 1.
Maybe at times one is more prevalent
@Deleted User Which forms?
@Deleted User There shouldn't be many for long.
@Deleted User not history, but men.
@Deleted User I think robots will be smarter very fast. I think you can create AI, it will be done soon.
@Deleted User robot society will die soon too.
And thats it.
Depends. If they progress, they do die.
Maybe you can preserve the long existence, but why?
@Deleted User not much. Fast progress.
To nothing.
absolute nothing
At first they made Dzerzhinski statue fall, now we'e got Leninofall in Ukraine. What we do?
๐
North Korea > Ukraine
ะงัะพ ะณะพะฒะพััั, ะบะฐะบ ัะตะฐะณะธัััั ัะบัะฐะธะฝัั? ะัะพััั ะตัะต?
Cuba >>> Ukraine
Not going to compare USSR
201 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/3
| Next