Message from @Ornament
Discord ID: 314542587451146243
@OF-8 Yes, Marxism is a true science. Marxism is defined as materialism.
a philosophy too
LMFOALFMAOR HOLY SHIT REALLY nigger!?
No. Stop. You are not up your own ass that hard?
yes, again he discovered labour exploitation
@OF-8 If you want to use one word to define Marxism its: "Materialism" - Lenin
Ok now I'm truly struggling.
Holy shit.
Lmfao
Wait. Is this like how women's studies is now a science?
neoclassical economics are idealist pseudoscience, closed models to match the society
Like when we discover an exploitation, bam! New science!
marxism describes capitalism; he didn't propose a clear socialist alternative
that's done by modern marxist economists; planned economy is from Lenin
and it was shaped by Stalin in practice
Bleh, that was legit prescient.
now we have cybernetics to improve supply and demand in real time, in a central planned economy
@OF-8 Marx studies whole society of his time and writes a book called "Capital".
And right back to retard land.
U know much about the technicals of cybernetics?
Don't count on that shit being worth a damn in your lifetime.
Allin Cottrel, Paul Cockshott do
Apparently not tho.
also, in Allende's Chile they had a project called Cybersyn
I know this project
Stafford Beer in the 70's wanted to establish a cybernetic system there
My friends and I peed ourselves reading cybersyn docs
maybe, from the 70s
You know tho. I do. I love that you dug that deep
well, when people say that it's an economic dictatorship; I'd point that there are technical improvements
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/70/Cybersyn_control_room.jpg A E S T H E T I C
just about every third sycophant I fucked in Silicon Valley said something similar.
well, some leftcoms would disagree with me
"But we got mongodb, so socialism will work this time"
but that's not from marx
It's for socialist proposals, not from the analysis of capitalism
Clearly
If it wasn't based on a shit stack of bad assumptions it'd work