@yThos bruh, if those girls are going to the university, *especially if they're taking a class on post colonial theory* and the importance of maintaining culture (a class topic common among left leaning universities), they should be smart enough to know better.

It might be that in the United States, blacks who are smart enough to go to university are also smart enough to understand the large black nationalist tradition and as such are keeping to themselves to maintain their own purity. I have seen disproportionately large amount of black academics with that based attitude.

Only fools think it is okay to race mix.

I have seen white black relationships, but I have noticed that in those instances, the black doesn't have all that much education so they probably don't understand how they're betraying their group.

Not really. Look at one flew over a cuckoo's nest; a good portion of the main cast are sane, but the majority are ill. The sick just don't get as much screen time due to how the audience can't relate as much. @Lucien

Also, every story needs conflict and a slow recovery isn't as engaging as some one wrongly locked up.

@yThos Well I think you just accidentally answered why there's such a race mixing problem. As we highlighted with post colonial theory and black nationalism among other things derided, a lot it isn't bullshit; a huge portion of leftist stuff is genuinely good political philosophy needed for a complete understanding of the social sciences. There's a reason we, as fascists, object to being called mere rightwingers, for we also take a lot from the left. The left isn't entirely bullshit; it can often be based, just as much as the right.

In fact, maybe even more so.

@The State Progressivism is stupid, but on egalitarianism, don't straw man the left; Karl Marx himself wrote extensively on why equality is too vague a goal and often counterproductive and bad to pursue, even at times considering himself anti-egalitarian. Just look at the socialist maxim; different people have different needs and different people have different abilities.

Maxim Gorky is whom you are thinking of

I see what you mean.

Also, the phrase used by Trotsky is "eternal revolution" not "perpetual revolution"

Stalin is just better material for memes. Leftists tend to actually agree more with Trotsky, being the basis of antifascist theory and all.

Honestly, I disagree with the notion that there's no end in sight with the left's progressivism. I think with Foucault's invitation for us to always think about who is asking the questions and who is allowed into the discourse and his post structuralist critique of the basis of everything we have seen the peak of how far the left can go. You can't condemn more than the set of all things; there literally is no way to critique more stuff than everything. And as such, in recent years, you can see a backlash and a subversion to the eternal revolution. Most of the recent increasing degradation of culture has just been application of that theory, and seeing how that theory is losing popularity among academics, the left at large should similarly go back to normal. @The State

You can't go much further than criticizing truth itself for being too hierarchical.

God be with you, my friend

Yeah, I agree they're always going to fight for something, even if that something changes or their paradigm on how changes, because if they didn't struggle they wouldn't be the left. But those changes should not be underestimated.

Indeed, I would say that with the proper adjustments, it's almost Nietzschen, almost fascistic in the continual pursuit of improvement regardless of how things are; that Evolan riding of the tiger. In fact, I find it interesting the similarities between this description of the left and various critiques I have heard of fascism; the claims that when we get power we end up running in circles continually purifying ourselves and that we're fundamentally unstable when in charge. Perhaps we share that innate ideological righteousness with left.

@yThos We're arguing about how based leftist theory is or can be.

Perhaps perhaps. We certainly wouldn't disregard our past, but I like to think we wouldn't grow complacent. We are not the left, but nor are we the right. I like to think each of us would like the next generation be more based than the last, regardless of if that's unrealistic. We just wouldn't put ourselves in continual revolutionary conflict to do so.

That Catch 22 about our total victory is like one or two things I actually would agree with when it comes to critiques of us.

Maybe that should be a poll. Considering conflict is how we grow, what do we do if we win? The classical answer is that we let ourselves promptly fail so the cycle can continue, but that seems rather rarted.

Nietzsche outright rejected goal based thinking in favor of amore fati for issues like this.

@The State Would it though? People like Evola would say we started in that near perfect state, yet over the centuries we still managed to reach the decadence we have now.

So the problem is delayed then, not gone?

The decay would just be slow, not gone. @The State

Catch 22. An example is:

In needing experience to get a job..."How can I get any experience until I get a job that gives me experience?"

@Vlaaaad Smh, where's my state mandated gf?

Ew, miscegenation

Fair

Oof

Although, haven't we already establish that you preform fucking other races and thus already are into beastialty?

@Punished Juan Although for some reason I suspect they aren't going to have them cure their homosexual illnesses for leaving hell. (Although if they do depict that, the show will gain my respect)

That would be great

CONSOOM PRODUCT

I swear, I wouldn't mind atheists as much if, when they look at the question posited by Nietzsche in that whole "God is dead" spiel about what to orient life around if not God, they answer with just about *anything* except for the ways they currently do answer that question.

I mean, most everything I could think of wouldn't answer that, so I can see why they are the way they are.

Yeah

IRL, people often mistake me for a leftie, however people often figure out where I actually stand and when asked, I always go through the various definitions of "fascist" to say how it's debatable.

Yeah I support women's equality! 😎

That's a classic

At this point, pretty much.

Legitimately, we always talk about for instance how women of our race aren't becoming mothers, but the main reason for that is capitalism. If you look at the Soviet Union (which was a lot too progressive but still), without those economic incentives, fertility rates were high. Then when it collapsed, fertility rates plummeted.

Similar analysis can be done on a multitude of issues.

I would rather not have a car than not have food.

Ahh, yes because commies could control the weather

Based

based

Thin crust, hand tossed, or Chicago style?

I need clarification on the measurements

There are things to do beside consoom

There's reading old philosophy books

And walking

And that's about it really

Yeah, that's not much

Behold, we are the armchair fascists!

!nazbol

!nationalbolshevik

!nationalbolshevik

!nazbol

This is epic

Accurate

Drugs are almost always cringe; prevent you from thinking with utmost clarity and often distract from the important things in life like reading, family, teaching your family how to read, other self improvement, etc.

I have such mixed feelings about alcohol.

Why is alcohol based?

Yeah only *pretty* fucked up, but no more than just *pretty.* We don't want to go too far.

Sounds worse if you ask me based purely on what you've said about the Albania-Greece border

Eh, I don't want to be relaxed; I want to maintain my continual scowl and passion. @sopremOTIST

Anyhow, I'm heading to bed so I can keep doing that self-improvement fascism thing.

Very insightful

https://vimeo.com/336418671

There are so many vacant houses and apartments in America, more than there are homeless people. The fact that our economic system leaves many people homeless and gives worse than prison conditions to others, rather than actual *houses* is one of the saddest things. You can't raise a ***family*** in that! You shouldn't even ***live*** like that! Mere economic reforms would do more to save tradition and race than most other things.

I saw something from Farmer in this conversation I really liked; intellectual integrity. We should doubt fascism, not because its premises are false, but precisely because they are true. There's a really nice Mosley quote I might pull up tomorrow, but I thought I might leave this here.

Also Siege is pretty cringe from what I have read of it; the sections I've seen have that same sort of retarded tactics you see with normal anarchists, namely the so called "propaganda of the deed." Of course, I never read the whole thing; I felt my time was better spend with actual academia.

Yeah, @The State , fascism isn't just "truth"; fascism doesn't relate to number theory even though number theory is true.

Propaganda of the deed is a good way to rally the opposition against you when you don't have much power. See the destruction of the Reichstag for instance

@Deleted User Hence why reckless terrorism is silly

Anarcho-niggerism sounds based. Is that assessment fair?

Anyhow, speaking of universal truths relating to discipline and such, I will head off to bed; glad I dropped something in, but farewell.

I don't know; it was pretty epic when Bakunin insulted Marx for being a jew and said that decentralization is good because it prevents the jews from taking over. Still sort of retarded, but still.