AngryTeapot(inactive/studying)

Discord ID: 132861920830029825


30 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1

@Firefly more than ever yes, we updated all servers/websites and are producing monthly content with members and admins. I started editing with good software as well.
prolly gonna make an ad for it to bring in new people

sry for late reply wew

mostly syria/rojava but getting into more general pods about global events like in the past, once the conflict settles
that is just for the pod. The other admin does articles and other things, but anyone is free to apply content on our channel/discord

that's a bit pessimitic lad

but I see your point

Sora
22,
Boring, haven't even tried reading it
sweden
I do not really care about equality, i care about justice and that hierarchies are not imposed, but
accepted as part of a healthy society and a cornerstone of civilization. i'd say i have an affinity towards
technocracy and meritocracy, but i don't like vanguard elitism, because structural issues.
i believe in organic communities, that have solidarity and common values. The closest
i come to in terms of value is non-aligned movement, civic nationalism/social contractarianism for culture and council-communism for political structure, and market socialism with decentralized planning for economy (fourth positionist zizekian/europeean version of neo-china???)
I think trade, mutual aid and moderate borders are vital to peace, and unity.

Fascism is like liberalism and communism and *idea* most and foremost, not just an economic or political system,
it varies more from country to country, i don't think Hitler was a good rep of fascism, more so Mussolini and Mosley.
It's not altright, it's authoritarian and state-oriented at it's core, a strongly idealistic ideology. It's more rightwing in terms
of hierarchy
i think CCP is a good modern example of modern fascism, with it's strong nationalism, Confucianism one party corporate technocratic monopoly etc.

Dugins, fourth political theory, nick lands NRX, unconditional accelerationism. decentralized planning, cybernetics etc.
I've been into politics for around 8 years. multiple organizations.

I treat liberals and fascists equally. I criticise liberals for their faith in liberal democracy, especially people like Sam Harris and Steven pinker,
and i criticize some fascists for being too reactionary and anti-progress, especially how they deal with corruption and economic questions,
In regards to nationalization and protectionism. I agree with fascists a lot more on environmental questions, using state power,
liberals a lot more in regards to economics and peace, making finance highly decentralized and dependent on mutual aid.
I treat them in the way i think their stances correspond to and are in line with reality.

A world which highest value is embracing reality, acting in accordance to the law of contradiction,
in a hegelian sense. In essence, a progressive world that is based on understanding and embraces healthy
hierarchies, logic, act according material conditions and strive for collective wellbeing.
In short communitarianism.

It's pure ideology, nihilist hedonistic reproduction without any real sense of purpose.
art and aesthetics aside, the first world and upper class seem to value experience more
than logical consistency and something greater than themselves

there is a complete and utter lack of authenticity, and realism that disgusts me.

so i guess you could say i don't like it :))

12. I adhere to post-marxist philosophy, i don't like the class reductionism of the 20th century,
or the vulgar materialism espoused by some marxists. i dislike essentialism, and post-modern
rejection of grand narratives

I still read marx and marxists more than any economists, but hegel is the true hero
in between the lines. i sometimes use the label libertarian marxism to describe my
political stance, but it misses the social aspect and the necessity of state power.

i don't like anarchism, and i don't like the soviet union. I think marx and hegel are some the
Most misunderstood philosophers and theorists of all time and, there is much to be learned
from their writings, and the writings inspired from them.

Gramsci and Pannekoek are my only real respectabe marxists, if you wanna count Zizek,
but in general i feel the original philsophy had a *lot* of shortcomings

I come here mainly to have my ideas challenged and i find fascists more interesting
than liberals. modern idpol, "socialism" and such doesn't interest me very much

30 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1