WW2 was what; 1923? IIRC, so it would be possible to be born in the 19th century and exist during it

gotcha

he died at age 65? that's really good for that time

gotcha

goodnight

do we even need videos explaining why Vaush failed?

seems pretty self-explanatory if you ask me

oh the kid who reported on civi killings from US military drone strikes?

you assume corporations have any forethought @calman21

what about corporations that make millions doing immoral practices? Like Nestle and funding slavery in cocoa fields

publicly owned and traded corps do not care about consequences

tbh generations don't care about consequences. "Won't affect me" is what I hear a lot of people state

"I won't be alive when it ruins the Earth"

automobile assembly line is very easy to research

also, what about the people that physically connected telephone connections? Tele-operators or whatever they were called

tech always replaces human workers, for better or for worse

it's just an example

and I assume more about publicly owned corps @calman21

private owned corporations are far more moral and effective

except when low skill jobs want 15/hr and exceed the cost of automation

papa johns is a fairly good example. that corp had a lot of good benefits and treated employees well and did a lot of donations etc when it was privately owned

became shit when it went publicly owned

mine? @Tiberius

honestly the only jobs with resistance from AI replacement would be ones that have something that AI isn't currently capable of doing. Things like creativity based skills

if nature can do it then it can be replicated

so its inevitable that AI would become very close to humans in every aspect

but then by that logic corporations wouldn't lower wages, especially when the cost of living rises

but here we are

fine motor skills is becoming far easier to make

remember that the top professors and intellects in the 90s said a computer driving a car was a physical impossibility

Alphabet has already put millions of miles on the road with 0 accidents

they're already here

they're just not cost effective atm

when the machinery to make these things more cheaply happens then they will be everywhere

just like all tech

it sticks, something else is sticky too

not at Alphabet

Telsa sure

but Telsa is largely a joke of a company

you're forgetting that people only care about the immediate calman

it will eventually happen eternal boomer

its just not a priority atm

so? Apple isn't a revolutionary company either but makes a fuckload of sells

consumers are stupid and ruin the market TL;DR

trans what?

my statement was in regards to self-driving cars that work @Jokerfaic

not the success rate of sells

*looks at the 3 self-driving deaths from tesla*

yep, looks good to me!

I did! thats what ive been talking about!

what do you mean? self-driving cars do drive in cities and have a lot of mileage there

alphabet runs their cars all over

uhm, san fran?

one of the cali big cities

can you elaborate on that guderian?

you're just a hamster calman

what do you think about the people who want to develop AI and then make the human race go extinct and let AI take over

what would justify this "upgrade"? surely if it is an upgrade what are we upgrading? For this question to be answered we need a definitive stance on what the human species goal in the universe is

because why work when the incentive is so low?

no, not all robots are AI. AI implies it has the capability to learn

robots can be fully preprogrammed and incapable of learning

they're distinct

that's like saying a pulley system can learn algebra

it isn't capable

an automated pulley system will make nukes and kill us all

you're tearing this family apart guderian!

shouldn't that be a group consensus thing?

*looks at how every country handles nukes*

*sweats*

fine, i rule all the nukes now and I say we nuke Sweden

but the legal system does dictate the actions of businesses

let's just make hunger games as a response to AI taking low level jobs

if you no work then you go in the pit!

I'm saying that if AI threatens humans and their quality of life then it should have restrictions imposed on it

AI has actually demonstrated creative ways of breaking rules and finding loop holes. They would be better than any human lawyer lol

many would argue that those technological advancements are a huge cause of the problems humans are currently facing

now apply that to AI

murder is subjective morality, you can abstract anything to the point where literally even reality itself is subjective

*looks at quantum physics*

121 million possible outcomes

not moves

your chest board would be bigger than the size of north america if you had 121million moves you could make

I don't think we should throw the entire human species in the garbage can just because AI has a fancy hyper-threaded 6 core CPU

AI isn't needed for a job like that, automation would suffice

we don't need Skynet to run a burger stand

he could be replaced with AI though

I say we make all the low skill workers become Youtubers.....wait a minute...

but there's only a superficial difference between the two

i only need one word as an argument

whistleblowers

it depends if the work actually needs to get done

superficial work like customer support doesn't actually need to get done

hi

I don't usually ask for sources but ima need to see a source on this violent crime and smoking the ganja correlation study

oh , ty

what is this ca politics?

california politics?

oh

canada has politics?

i thought you were all just a bunch of cucks that do what you're told