whether it is or isnt, its at least perceived

theyre fucking idiots for doing that

but regardless, we want the vote honoured and to have some freedom and shit back

because its the right thing to be doing

proof socialism is idiotic: russia china Khmer rouge venezeula

ITLL WORK THIS TIME GUYS

imagine being told 2+2=4 and you think 'but maybe if i calculate NOW 2+2=5

oh yeah Che Guvera killed gay people

nice

the gays wanted to get fucked by men, so Che obliged

Venezuela

also swedens been going more and more social with its policies and its getting worse than worse

socialists are greedy lazy asshats that feel they should be given free shit from people working because theyre 'nice people' who want everyone to be happy

i tried explaining that to my friend

i layed out the basis of why left and right extremes are both evil

and he just thinks the right is evil and not the left

because the left does it with 'good intentions'

and i say that communists killing 100m people arent very nice good intended people...

and hes also someone that would kill anyone that tried to take his guns

and he admits to necessary evils

being necessary

but apparently cant see that trying to eliminate all evil, ends up being more evil

no matter intent

because the Left's intentions is to make things nicer

whereas the Rights intentions end up with extreme hierarchy differences

the Right understands necessary evils are necessary

sometimes they go too far with how much evil is necessary

the left doesnt think evil should exist, which then as with all socialist countries, results in more evil

its like not laying down a foundation for a house

the bricks on the bottom dont like having to hold up all the other bricks and the entire 90% of the house

but they are needed

otherwise the whole house falls down

depends what you define as 'evil', which i would say is'against god' and my definition of 'god' is 'the truth that is apparent in the world'

aka, freedom is better than tyranny

more people thrive and are happier

therefore, tyranny results in suffering and therefore is evil

in that sense

morality is based on effective tactics

if you steal from somewhere, they wont like you

if you trade in good faith with someone, they want to trade more

and its way more beneficial to both parties

therefore it would stand that morality comes in co-operation tactics

because it makes more good

and the social contract is built via beliefs and practices, essentially, in 'god'

like the non-zero sum game

and the consitution is based on the founders observations of what is correct in the world

thats why the country succeeds where others have failed

because they have aligned with the 'truth' of the world

being that liberty and individuality is paramount

hence why democracy is the only thing that can function

NO ONE MAN CAN HAVE ALL THAT POOOOWER

ye

if its autism, show me an authoritarian regime thats been good and works

show me when the governing body rejects the will of the majority of people

that is a good place to be

and why dont you move there

and why do so many people flee from tyranical countries

if they functioned in the past why dont they function now

fucking evolution dude

you want to go live in china or NK?

if power is the only thing you must love being under dictators

unless of course you just want the powerful to be you, or an avatar of you and your ideas

which is fucking disgusting

ive never mentioned power in my moral system

literally lying

the moral system is when people do things that produce more good than bad

which is through co-operation

not power games

of who is stronger than the other and controls others

no where does it become a power game

socialism is an enforced moral system

rather than a' naturalistic' one if there is such a thing

god i love free speech

we owning some libs tonight, kids

<:powerful:595334910764515338>

RISE UP GAMERS

<:spurdo:500782204788670474>

because theyre idiot children being lied to

like i dont fucking know what these people think facism is

'whatever i dont like' i guess

while i understand that tim, the risk of it being stalin that comes to power

rather than the slow steady progress of democracy

its a good point though

id rather agree to the rules where no one in a game can just declare themselves the winner, even if it means half the time the guy i side with wins

conservatism is progressivism driving the speed limit

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

again, necessary evils

children dont understand this

they werent punished as children because their dads were cucks

with my lefty deranged friend, his dad was abusive and an alcoholic and divorced before his teens. my dad died before my teens and was never abusive.

i have respect for punishment and authority

my friend does not

i dont think thats a coincidence tbh

nop

not that i can think of

loosey

no i was

i was terrified of everything

and id have tantrums and shit

good question