Which is why I often jokingly, though not so jokingly refer to the "alt-right" as the "aut-right"

Well, unfortunately for you, the "white people amiright?" stuff has actually worked for decades now

Do you really not know how long this bullshit has been going on?

The reason the normies woke up wasn't because of a bunch of SJW's saying how bad white people are, it's because those SJW's started attacking entertainment media.

They fucked up, and crashed the Circuses.

When they were being given free reign to just keep taking over the whole city.

Yeah, I've seen some, thank God.

It mostly doesn't go beyond "skeptic tm" vblogging or something, though, unfortunately.

I would love if more of these people actually helped to build real communities and organizations.

Well, it's also technically a product of extensive academic and media indoctrination, but sure

Basically, people generally chose to just not engage most of the time, because it wasn't *worth* their time. But not interaction online is relatively low cost, so there's a lot more of it.

It's kind of a *reconnection* into communication, after an extensive era of atomization and indoctrination. And many people are shocked by the products of this indoctrination.

How far it's gone.

The thing is, though, without a sense of imminent danger, it's very likely that eventually normies will just grow apathetic to even this, like they have in the past.

It's just too exhausting to care, unless it feels as if it's going to matter soon.

So, people will be outraged for a while, and then they'll just grow accustomed to it, and move on.

I never sub to anything, tbh.

Mostly because I don't like having to log into youtube

I don't remember what the last sargon video I saw was

lel

But for me, it's less of a fatigue, and more of disgust. Not at sargon specifically, but at people in general. They never fucking do anything.

It's like being on the Titanic, exept instead of being caught off guard by the iceberg, millions of people see it coming, and just argue with each other about what to do about it for 6 years.

Federal politics isn't gonna work. There's too much entrenched power there.

Focus on local organizing and local level politics.

The goal shouldn't be to change the superstate, but to make your own community not need them, nor rely on them.

If everyone who saw that iceberg coming did this, then it would dramatically limit the damage it would eventually do.

We can't steer the ship away, but we can go ahead and get more life boats prepared and organized.

The thing is, I realized Sargon's idea was dumb, and probably not going to work, but I still respected him for trying.

At least he was doing something.

I suspect all of them will be largely unsuccessful. With the exception of Tommy, who, well, that's complicated. And Avi, I don't really know who that is.

lol

because they're stupid, and don't realize TR is also Jewish?

True, you have to do more digging for Tommy

With Avi, I was immediately like 🤔

I think relying on anyone who could actually be allowed to win political power within the current political system, to actually change the system in your favor is naive.

Two main reasons
1. They call it "the swamp" for a damn good reason, otherwise authentic actors face considerable pressure to cave to the established corrupt paradigm in order to get anything done
2. the kinds of criminal actors maintaining the establishment deserve to hang, and they know this, so if they detect the prospect of an authentic and competent reformer, they will employ every tool at their disposal to obstruct them, up to and including assassination. If some prospective reformer *hasn't* been assassinated, there's a good chance they're not actually all that concerned, and are more simply *annoyed*

The number of times Tommy has been subject to being imprisoned with Muslims is a promising reflection on his authenticity, but I'm still wary. That being said, I can't exactly argue that there are many *better* prospects for the UK, just that I'm wary of vesting too much faith in his ability and mission.

Well, Germany, Sweden, and the UK are pretty much competing for that title. Canada sometimes swings in, but it's hard to saturate that large of a territory with sufficient poz to take home the crown.

Even straya pisses me off. And the NZ government, top wew.

I regularly talk to a guy living in Germany, who is pretty much a leftist by my reckoning, but has become depressingly black-pilled about how bad Germany is.

I said he's a leftist by my reckoning.

By German standards, he's probably a "right wing extremist"

Germans don't even care if they go extinct.

Most seem apathetic, and many even welcome the prospect.

Yes.

https://joshualightningwarrior.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/george-patton-berlin-blues-mongols-rape.jpg

https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/763080/2.jpg

There's a bitter side to that, however. In what it suggests of a nation for it to be survived by the descendants of those who, when faced with villainy, chose to flee instead of fight it.

Eventually, yes. But heritage endures. And what a depressing legacy, to have survived because you *wouldn't* fight to save your people.

And you're wrong, the war is still fought with weapons, the subjugated have simply accepted it as *moral* that they should not appreciate the luxury of themselves fighting with arms. Instead using words to try and dissuade the vile mechanization of their armed, and forceful enemy.

It can. But they won't do it. Not yet.

The government literally can't afford to suppress an open civil was with a sufficiently committed and armed population.

Because they rely on the same infrastructure, and are in fact *more* dependent on that infrastructure.

Why do you think the highway system was built?

Only if people choose not to fight.

No, they won't because they refuse to accept they need to.

And because they're still too comfortable.

They believe the revolution is bad guys because it facilitates their delusion that their inaction is the product of morality, instead of cowardice.

They don't want to take that risk, yet. Because they still perceive compliance as being more beneficial than defiance.

Less of a risk.

Maybe now you better understand why I'm so disgusted.

An ounce of strategic defiance today could save hexatons of bloodshed tomorrow.

But that won't happen.

Because people are too comfortable still. And too afraid to lose what they have. They still think they can bargain with it.

I don't have a lot of faith in France's peaceful revolution.

Even if it's successful, the authors of their misery will just go to another country.

HAHAHA

I'm sorry, I'm just laughing at the thought that unseating*Macron* is gonna be the victory condition here.

https://imgoat.com/uploads/8baa56554f/141907.jpg

There's a *loooot* of work to be done.

The root of corruption is extensive, and has been allowed to flourish for generations.

The elected officials hardly even fucking matter. Maybe start looking into the unelected positions, agencies, multinational corporations, global banking.

You think the real big leaguers even allow for the possibility of losing their power due to something as asinine as a democratic election?

They just don't own candidates, they own entire bureaus, entire political parties.

They win by presenting the population with a game they know they themselves can't even lose.

While concealing any real method of unseating them with extreme prejudice.

Wouldn't it make more sense to kill *them?*

Rather than yourself, I mean.

Speaking hypothetically.

Having a spine isn't a bad reputation.

I wasn't referring to the Jews.

Germany's reputation being ruined was, frankly, a team effort

No, I mean, some of it was Hitler and the Nazis, some of it was their enemies' lies.

Moral dimensions are certainly an important factor. But speaking from a purely strategic point of view, his biggest failure was underestimating his opponent, and how extensive their influence was.

It was kind of a case of him being, in one way, *more* correct than he really knew.

Basically, because of how deep the international banking elite already had their claws into the world nations, it ensured that any attempt to seize territory from them, would result in a world war, with tremendous forces rallying against him, whether the people of those nations really wanted it or not.

If you examine contemporary news sources, the war was often *very unpopular* but that didn't matter, because the government actors were invested.

Some were what should have obviously been considered bad decisions, yes.

Others, made more sense at the time, and only retrospect reveals how much of a mistake they really were.

Hence, "It's Okay to be Jewish"

Tall order

lol

Didn't he also say, 'No plan, no matter how well devised, survives contact with the enemy'?

To an extent, they kind of couldn't afford to. Which reveals how bad of a position they were really in to begin with.

Like, for instance, in terms of access to fuels.

One of the reasons for the recklessness of their expansion was to try and secure access to fuel sources.

Joke's on her, he actually works for Aperture Science.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/tI1rbIYwK4A/

Exactly

But at the same time, Russia was an enemy that couldn't be ignored.