All four of those are definitely radically left right now

Germany maybe the least yet, but we'll see

Even straya pisses me off. And the NZ government, top wew.

I regularly talk to a guy living in Germany, who is pretty much a leftist by my reckoning, but has become depressingly black-pilled about how bad Germany is.

A black-pilled leftist in Germany? That's an oddity

https://tenor.com/view/umm-confused-wtf-blinking-okay-gif-7513882

What's his main gripe with German or EU politics?

I said he's a leftist by my reckoning.

an leftie that is black pilled REEEELY

By German standards, he's probably a "right wing extremist"

Oh ok, gotcha

Right, so perhaps just a centrist

Well what's his main gripe though?

Germans don't even care if they go extinct.

Most seem apathetic, and many even welcome the prospect.

Wait, as an ethnic group, as a racial group, as a nation, in which way?

Yes.

hahaha

Well then screw them

Would be a blow to our tourism here if Germany went under, but I think we'll recover

https://joshualightningwarrior.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/george-patton-berlin-blues-mongols-rape.jpg

https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/763080/2.jpg

Well, the Germans will live on in the US, even if it costs them their name

Some will move to Austria

Or maybe Switzerland

We're already experiencing German flight to Austria anyway

There's a bitter side to that, however. In what it suggests of a nation for it to be survived by the descendants of those who, when faced with villainy, chose to flee instead of fight it.

Civil war is no longer being fought on the streets with weapons, those times are long gone

Countries will eventually dissolve, too

Eventually, yes. But heritage endures. And what a depressing legacy, to have survived because you *wouldn't* fight to save your people.

That's one of the few things where I agree with Stefan Molyneux - why fight for people who don't want to be saved?

And you're wrong, the war is still fought with weapons, the subjugated have simply accepted it as *moral* that they should not appreciate the luxury of themselves fighting with arms. Instead using words to try and dissuade the vile mechanization of their armed, and forceful enemy.

Civil war can't be won by the populace with weapons

It can. But they won't do it. Not yet.

Those times are over since roughly the 20th century

No, look

The populace doesn't have the neccessary intelligence to fight a war against their governments successfuly, and the reason is simply technological

The government and social media work hand in hand for a reason

The government literally can't afford to suppress an open civil was with a sufficiently committed and armed population.

Because they rely on the same infrastructure, and are in fact *more* dependent on that infrastructure.

They can, that's what AntiFa is there fore