You think the real big leaguers even allow for the possibility of losing their power due to something as asinine as a democratic election?

That's not what it's about

Mafia will be mafia, that's never gonna change

They just don't own candidates, they own entire bureaus, entire political parties.

They win by presenting the population with a game they know they themselves can't even lose.

I know, but I don't worry about that, because if I did, I could just as well kill myself. It would mean that trying at all is meaningless. And I don't believe that, because I believe life is a constant struggle between good and evil.

While concealing any real method of unseating them with extreme prejudice.

Wouldn't it make more sense to kill *them?*

Evil will never stop acting, and so good people should also never stop either. But our tactics can change.

Rather than yourself, I mean.

No, this is the dilemma that I was talking about earlier

Speaking hypothetically.

You can't ruin the reputation of your people for the greater good, look what harm it did to the Jews

Having a spine isn't a bad reputation.

They conquered Israel unprovoked, that's not "having a spine"

I wasn't referring to the Jews.

But I am, and I'm doing this for a reason

Hitler ruined the German reputation
The Jews harmed their reputation
It doesn't help the people in the long run

Germany's reputation being ruined was, frankly, a team effort

Most Germans didn't ask for this

No, I mean, some of it was Hitler and the Nazis, some of it was their enemies' lies.

Sure, but Hitler didn't have to go to war and murder Jews, it was his stupid ideas about the economy that did this

He was an idiot, he didn't think big, and he didn't think long-term

Moral dimensions are certainly an important factor. But speaking from a purely strategic point of view, his biggest failure was underestimating his opponent, and how extensive their influence was.

I strongly disagree

The people of the future will always judge history, and they're very powerful

Because if you're dead, you have no voice

It was kind of a case of him being, in one way, *more* correct than he really knew.

Basically, because of how deep the international banking elite already had their claws into the world nations, it ensured that any attempt to seize territory from them, would result in a world war, with tremendous forces rallying against him, whether the people of those nations really wanted it or not.

If you examine contemporary news sources, the war was often *very unpopular* but that didn't matter, because the government actors were invested.

Look

I'm not saying Hitler had an easy task

I'm saying he chose the worst actions

Some were what should have obviously been considered bad decisions, yes.

Others, made more sense at the time, and only retrospect reveals how much of a mistake they really were.

It was a time of revolutions, many people made similar mistakes, not just Hitler, so yeah I agree on that

We should learn from those mistakes and find what are actually the best moves

Like chess players who go from low rating to super GM rating

We need to stop thinking short-term, small scale

That's early 20th century, and those times still haunt us today

Hence, "It's Okay to be Jewish"