Comando

Discord ID: 408395451713323018


3,729 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/38 | Next

@Muten
P = Price level (inflation)
Y = Real income(quantity of stuff produced)
AD = Aggregate demand (Aggregate meaning total)
LRAS = Long Run Aggregate Supply (the total capacity of the economy)

One of the key differences between economics prior to Kenyes was that the economy would always rebound. For S O M E R E A S O N it didn't.

Keynes in contrast identified that something had changed. He conceptulized that there was a force which unlike before, was cutting into the effective demand (aggregate demand) of the economy.

So whilst the country had the factories, and the people willing to work them, the money that existed was not being applied to the economy.

Keynes solution? Use Government spending to increase aggregate demand to get out of the rut, then scale back involvement, during the good times so you can do it again later.

Keynesism worked really well... until it didn't, and broke western economies in the late 1960's and 70's in the form of inflation

The problem being that there is no such thing as a Keynesian politician

They bloody well could explain what had happened, but weren't willing to accept that Governments had over applied fiscal policy

^Politicians will always have an incentive to spend and do something. This means that they will rarely cut back spending in practice. so Keynesianism is good when your in a rut, but will eventually break your economy if you continue it onwards.

I myself fall into being a post-Keynesian.

I think that Keynes was using tools, which while not... wrong, weren't correct in their understanding.

Keynes sucessfully identified that SOMETHING had changed, and that money was not being applied to the economy in the 30's and onwards

One of the chief differences is that... what if we completely misunderstood how money works?

Money, and debt...

What if... lending out money... creates new money...
What if, having loans repaid, takes money out of the economy?

And what if repaying loans takes out more money from the economy that it adds in? <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

If this hypothesis were true, then there would be economic crashes, whenever there was a period of credit creation, and whenever the credit stopped being created... there was a crash.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598761542200197120/599457746336743435/Private_Debt_to_GDP_not_housing.png

Oh fuck

@n meowzers What do you do with money from a loan? You apply it to the economy immediately.

If anyone can understand more technical documents

This is how money actually works, according to the Bank of England in 2014.

The first page is a summary

Loans literally create money

The bank

Of fucking England

Didn't realize that loans de facto create money, until 2014 <:thinkcide2:462282425486147585>

Hahahahah

Thing is Muten, this is the same system across the entire western world. The UK just discorvered this first ๐Ÿคก

2nd was the Bundesbank(Germany) and then the US Fed had one of its board members believe this as well.

So, its general knowledge now.

You don't have a banking lisence.

This mess is why Crypto became popular.

I don't think its a good solution, but its understandable as to why people would seek out alternative stores of value.

In the past, we did have a good banking system.

It is possible.

In the past banks, printed THEIR OWN currency. This currency was then owned by the owners of the banks. They handed over legal tender, in exchange for the currency of the bank. They could use it for trade if others wanted it but ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿป You weren't forced to take it.
The amount of money in circulation only increased because it was printed by the Government.

What happens if a bank lent out too much money? It collapsed. Everyone who invested in it lost their money

What happens now? Everyone loses all their money, because the banks can print legal tender now, whereas before they could not.

The root of the problem, is Fractional Reserve Lending.

(Not the Jews)

So here's the amount of US dollars that exist.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598761542200197120/599463204195663892/USD_M0.JPG

๐Ÿคก

But indeed. Why hasn't there been x4 inflation?

Well inflation only occurs in relation to the products that the money is applied to. So if this new money was... say... all given to the banks, and therefore only the banks spent this money... then there's no reason it would be applied to the price of cloths and food.

Bingo

Stocks, land and houses.

Hence why all have gone through the roof.

Remember kids. Its not inflation, if its assets **increasing in value**

Nope

Asset appreciation is zeo sum. Its only good if you own the house.

Most people don't own a lot of assets if any.

Think about it like this to see the trick. If assets increase x4 but everything else remains the same, then the amount of work you need to preform to get assets has increased by x4

๐Ÿคก ๐Ÿ”ซ

Actually that's the beauty of it. Assets have been inflated, but... the way in which they have been inflated, is permanent... unlike 2008

Unless all that Quantatative Easing money dissapears, its a permanent change.

And the only way to remove all of that mess is to slowely kill off all the major banks over the next 40 years, at the cost of the current generation... or have a politcal reform...

Hence the number of communists and fascists wanting to burn the liberal system down to the fucking ground

Arguably the baby problem, is a result of people not being able to afford houses, and all the rest of it.

2019-07-14 21:52:09 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

no xD

2019-07-14 21:56:17 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-07-14 22:18:29 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

You're is short for: You are
Your is possession

2019-07-14 22:18:38 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

In that instance the latter your was correct

Whole countries*

YES

2019-07-15 05:43:08 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

It is disruptive to be fair

2019-07-15 05:43:20 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

Tell me to shut the fuck up :P

2019-07-15 05:43:52 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

If I'm directly moderating someone then, its moderation. A necessary evil of disruption

2019-07-15 05:46:12 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

Is shire behaving?

Do it

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/598761542200197120/600215515755053069/emote_buhaha.png

<:thinkcide2:462282425486147585>

2019-07-17 07:13:48 UTC [Athens #gymnasium_games]  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-07-17 07:14:58 UTC [Athens #palaestra_debates]  

The weird thing about that article if that the Independent is 1 step away from saying: Therefore the only solution is to let them fight abroad or kill them here now - but they haven't quite realized it.

2019-07-17 19:59:38 UTC [Athens #palaestra_debates]  

Vicarious benevolence, would be a good way to put it. Get others to be benevolent on their behalf.

Very liberal with the number of beatings delivered?

2019-07-18 22:42:53 UTC [Athens #the-long-walls_immigrants]  

In the first one the judge observed the very crime which he was set to judge, meaning that he was couldn't be impartial. This was too much a breach of procedure that tones of legal people sperged about it and his conviction was thrown out.

2019-07-18 22:43:10 UTC [Athens #the-long-walls_immigrants]  

Now they've just stiched him up neatly.

2019-07-18 22:48:42 UTC [Athens #the-long-walls_immigrants]  

Because it was a procederal fuck up, they just decided to... do it again...

2019-07-18 22:48:58 UTC [Athens #the-long-walls_immigrants]  

Didn't give him a jury either

2019-07-18 23:42:10 UTC [Athens #tholos_general_news]  

Works really well as contraception tbf

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

I remember when /pol/ yeeted threads for merely posting that image

Why does Shoeonhead come to mind?

2019-07-19 00:42:24 UTC [Athens #piraeus_politics_news]  

Most terrorists are retarded. Be thankful. If they weren't retarded they might actually kill someone.

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

3,729 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/38 | Next