The non existing curvature

The non measurable rotation and revolution

Why do you focus so much on the detail, how about you look for the big flaws with your model

Such as the vacuum

Without a barrier

And that you don’t feel the the earth moving

Sure

Yes I do feel I’m moving, but supposedly I’m in the largest and most comfortable car I probably wouldn’t feel much right. However you will feel something when it accelerates and decelerates

Yes but we do change speeds

Yes it’s pretty big considering the speed it moves in

We accelerate and decelerate supposedly yet you can’t feel it

Or measure or test it

But you should believe it

No you can theories the measurements but it’s no where accurate or stable

The measurements they come up with change all the time

I’m talking about measuring our speed revolving the sun and spinning

Sure man anyways I’m bored from this talk you don’t seem very smart

You don’t know the distances but want to use trigonometry

How does that work

The distances they come up with changes all the time and is extremely inaccurate

Show me the trigonometry you use to find the distance to the sun

You don’t even know the size of the object

Yo

Not much

Idk I rarely open discord

Child abuse

Injecting a high dose of aluminium with polysorbate 80 into a newborn

hopefully once exploration and funding is legal and available

you can expect a decent model

bye

like how do you expect a working flat earth model if people dont know what is down in antartica and some places in the artic

and you would need to spend some money in research to figure things out

first we figure out our earth and then lets think about the sun and moon

ya i get you

but its not important

thats why the distance from the sun has changed dozens of times throughout history

not really

in some cases pretty significant

only recently the changes became small

but the basic trigonometry you talk about has been used a long time ago

and the changes are massive

if you actually want an accurate one you would atleast want to know the size of the sun

they can claim all they want

they have no proof

nope

i dont believe the sun is 400 times further and larger than the moon

they look similiar and close to me

idc what math nasa did

my eyes wont be deceived again

they use some weird technology to measure something so hard

that can be extremely inaccurate

and as i said the trigonometric model is flawed becuase the distance has constantly changed

doesnt matter they cant measure the distance to the planet

its not a laser

where does it say laser maybe i missed it

just like using radiometric data to measure old fossils is extremely inaccurate

what makes you think radio waves will measure distance of such far objects accurately

how can you test that?

you cant

know for sure

they said they radio frequencies can detect the age of a fossil almost accurately

yet there have been cases that prove they were extremely off

there was this fossil of a women found on an island in south of france

they claimed it was 29 million years old

radio frequencies

it was put in a museum

and removed in a few months when they discovered its a modern human

which are 3 million years old according to scienctists

so they were off by like 10x

i cant remember the name of the island

yes i know

26 million years of difference, just because they use a method that is somewhat accurate for objects that are hundreds or maybe thousands years old

they assume it would work for millions

or atleast millions according to them

idk how old the universe is

yes probably is a lot older than 6k

we cant

baseless claims

only if you believe you came from a fish

yes we did according to evolution

loooll " evolution denier"

whats there to deny

denying something that has never been proven

what evidence lol

evidence for adaptation

is now evolution

even biologist have no proof

its a " theory"

quite a weak one actually

made for those who are too arrogant to believe that maybe they were created

ok show me the fact

and ill believe in it

no they cant evolve in kind

from kind to kind

if by evolve you mean adapt then sure

im not gonna go through a wikipedia page for this

summarize your point

how does this prove the change in kind

so you dont know

okay then why are you defending something you dont understand