It's been a long time since I studied UK constitutional law. Maybe some of you lads from across the pond can help me understand, did the queen really have a say in suspending government or was the act of asking her just a formality. I understand it is the royal prerogative to suspend or dissolve parliament, but in reality is there any situation where the queen says no to a request from 10 downing street?
I've eaten plenty of bugs: bees, centipedes, ants, scorpions, crickets, grasshoppers, silk worm larva, etc. The small ones are not too bad, the larger ones are pretty nasty though.
But putting your knob in a bucket to bugs or letting a worm crawl up ones urethra... that's news to me. Call me old fashioned, but fucking a bug is pure degeneracy.
Same can be said for alot of foods. I dont go to chinese for egg rolls but they are on every damn takeout menu because people like greasy comfort food.
If counsel was somehow coercive, forceful, or intimidating maybe a courtroom confession could be thrown out. But unlikely as this behavior would likely result in the attorneys disbarment
There are rules. Most Judges in America require a certain level of decorum in the court room. If the attorneys get argumentative or overly aggressive they get reprimanded
She is lucky she was even somewhat close. Her opponent was a moron and an awful candidate that alienated half of the Atlanta suburbs. Against a competent Republican she would have lost by double digits
You are buying the Yale connections not the education. All law school teach the same stuff. But she is making a living off loosing an election. You need to be well connected to pull that off
I gave him a chance. Watched a few streams but he lost me on the part about white culture and interbreeding of races. That's a bit too close to white supremacy for my tastes
