The Republicans are right to abolish the estate tax. It’s an incredibly inefficient tax that generates negligible revenue. The only justification for it is “spoiled rich kids don’t deserve money they didn’t earn.” Which is sorta true, but it’s also true about all windfall gains (lottery, striking oil on your property, etc.)

We need less gun control not more

They’re infringing on my rights already

Those fuckers

NFA GO AWAY

Those Jewish cucks and their gun control

heres how you fix gun control

one, remove literally all the gun control laws and replace them with a very basic list of prohibited persons

two, solve the actual causes of crime

Guns don’t kill people

I kill people

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xC03hmS1Brk

Classic

i miss 2009

When memes were dreams

oh man I'm always happy when I get reminded of Jon Lajoie

show me your genitals

E=MC vagina

I can't put my fist in your college degree

i cant put my dick in your personality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4HEchh0XD8

steven crowder interviews the good guy with a gun

He used an AR-15 to stop the shooter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy ...that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

What a fucking great idea amirite?

AR-15? I get that the guy stopped the shooting but he could’ve destroyed an entire city block

it sounds like communism with extra steps

Normal citizens shouldn’t have RPGs

AK 15s were used in Vietnam to burn down jungles correct?

@DanConway exactly

it's essentially part of a revolutionary utopian vision

Now they're saying it might have been some sort of intra-family feud

The craziest part is that this strategy was actually implemented to some degree beginning in 66

the new deal

it all goes back to FDR

the idea that ypu can "create jobs" started with his policy

I'm just talking about the notion of intentionally causing crisis within governmental organizations.

specifically the welfare system

thats what i mean it all started with FDR era

the original progressives

well damn, not sure what you mean but I'm very interested

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal

"The New Deal produced a political realignment, making the Democratic Party the majority (as well as the party that held the White House for seven out of the nine Presidential terms from 1933-69). With its base in liberal ideas, the South, traditional Democrats, big city machines, and the newly empowered labor unions and ethnic minorities. The Republicans were split, with conservatives opposing the entire New Deal as an alleged enemy of business and growth, and liberals accepting some of it and promising to make it more efficient."

I'm wondering what aspect of the new deal was intended to generate crisis, or if you're saying it did regardless of intention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

it all started with FDR

Seems like a suspicious rationale, that's for sure.

"stalling economic growth" especially

im trying to figure out if the problem started with FDR

or if it was Theodore Roosevelt that was the real problem

he expanded the federal ownership of land in the US

Oh sweet god my forex portfolio is finally going back up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW51iM0hW78

Or maybe it's all George Washington's fault

Or maybe...

https://www.tenor.co/yHGu.gif

what the fuck am I looking at 😒

pure ideology

the funny part will be none of them are even working class

Louder with crowder. Lol

Why’d you even watch that shit

Crowder's alright

Not really.

Some of it. Maybe. But overall. No

He made a good point about gun control which I have seenplay out very much with my own family which is that many people just think guns look scary even though they have no problems with carbines.

Obviously thats not every gun control advocate, but I see it all to often to be ignored

aside from that and amy schumer

I haven't seen much from him

And I'm talking about guns that are the same as carbines except for the mechanism that reloads it is different, but have a bout the same fire rate.

He plays too much into party politics. He’s literally mainstream media but indie

He is much more credible than most MSM

He is definitely a conservative

Low bar.

Whatever

I respect his style

He tries to come with facts to support his arguments and seems legitimately open to other ideas

His bias is there, but he doesn't try to hide it or lie about it

A self serving conservative though. He doesn’t seem as interested in improving his own group as much as just discredit the other one

He presents a very reasonable conservative position

Well there is a lot to criticize idk

I haven't found a more insightful conservative voice

Though I need to look more into Ben Shapiro

I prefer Ben Shapiro, although I'm not a huge fan, but he makes good arguments, especially against SJWs.

Self critique is important if you want genuine improvement.

I'm not even looking for someone I strongly agree with

Just people with some intellectual rigor and curiosity

And different perspectives

I know we’re on sargons discord but he’s not much better

Who passes your bar then?

In the English media? Genuinely. No one person.

No one worth watching?

No one is interested in actual politics. More afraid of the big bad sjw. Meanwhile the nhs is being sold off to private investors and whatnot.

You can watch who you want but barely anyone touches on anything valuable and if they do. Generally it plays into party politics

Trying to find ideologically pure people to watch is a fruitless endeavor

Well I'm American

It isn't about finding someone who agrees with you totally it's finding rational people and comparing their arguments and coming to your own conclusions

And I find party politics fascinating if frustrating

If you take someone else's opinion as holy writ you're no better than the normies