I'm 21

@Baraban but the selection criteria are pretty synonymous among primates and mammals

What are they for females?

it doesn't matter what women think they want, they could potential want many things

"who's going to protect me and my child from harm and poverty?"

they want a man who isn't going to be a pussy, and that's about it

Define "not being a pussy" lol

Yeah that's comprensive

you should already know

Being "more selective" has a lot of complicated, in-depth resulting implications

It's a rhetorical question exposing the complicatedness of what we consider 'virtuous' in society

Am I a pussy because I want bulletproof windows on my car when driving through Johannesburg?

maybe not

Not at all, I think that shows proactivity to go and get safeguards

Pussies aren't proactive

Exactly. This term 'pussy' is too vague

what about soyboy instead?

So are male feminist who protest against "the patriarchy" not pussies because they are proactive?

^

What I'd consider to be a coward or a "pussy" is someone who is being irrational because of fear

Often worsening their chances of survivle instead of increasing it

```So are male feminist who protest against "the patriarchy" not pussies because they are proactive?```Proactivity doesn't mean much if you're going in it to be lauded, it needs to be a more personal thing

@Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 what does this tell you?

:dollar:** Support Sargon of Akkad on Patreon!** :dollar:

<https://www.patreon.com/sargon>

Already a Patreon supporter? Send a screenshot to JDM_WAAAT and you will get the patreon role.

@obrallaghan (((Overton window)))

everyone's authoritarian?

Labour is right wing. Yep. Totally.

Depends who you want to have authority, and how much. But yeah

totes not commies

not at all

*kicks tumbleweed*

"Labour has its own problems. Despite hopes from the left, the party leadership remains largely attached to the New Labour agenda that took the party to the centre ground in the late 1990s. At that time, around half the population supported the principle of a certain level of wealth redistribution. These days inequality, though greater, is less of an issue in the general shift to the right. Fewer than a third of the voters now believe in a helping hand to the least well-off. "

@obrallaghan according to what statistics? What were the questions asked?

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

you haven't seen that meme before?

https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2?ec=-1.0&soc=-2.31

It tells me that some of these Parties are not correct on this Grid

as in ALL

I could tell by the large grouping in the camp of 'Authoritarian Right'

they should make an app where we can put them on a grid

maybe they do

a wisdom of the masses/consesus "how would YOU define them?" kinda thing?

aye

This is too much to the left tbh

The whole square thing assumes you think second class citizens are a *bad* thing...

<:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>

lel

https://twitter.com/ArchWarhammer/status/979476914783039488

Canada, the US, the UK, and France need to make their own union, and then spread some freedom across Europe once again

?

I wonder how locals would react to a 'friendly' invading force

why france

They're not lost yet, and have ties to the US and CAN

the only lost country seems to be sweden

Liberation

their government is really, really committed to fuck their country

also, there is no such thing as friendly invading force

UK needs to build closer ties with the commonwealth

Well, historically no

But an invading force who's intent ISN'T to battle the local populace or permanently stay?

the words invading and friendly don't make sense together

as i said

how about 'Intearnational Martial law volunteers'

there is no such thing as friendly invading force

a invading force is a invading force, doesn't matter how you name, you can call it " surprise party guests" still a invading force

I'm just thinking of the International politics version of an intervention for a drug addict

makes no sense

who are you to tell what a sovereign nation can or can't do?

this is literary what's wrong with the EU, they are imposing what they want on other nations

Well, what is a soverign nation supposed to do, when their own constituents aren't telling them what to do?

what?

Sweden fucked themselves, and it can hurt the international community.

it probably will hurt Europe

same shit to what Germany did

Patriots Made America Great Again.

Let's make Sweden Great again

that's really stupid

it's the same shit as " i think communist is great, let's spread it to other nations trough force"

What's stupid is being a cuck to your government for opening your borders

I'm not spreading anything. I"m eradicating a virus that infected a western nation

.....

what is this you say in Allah's name?

If I wanted to see 'real Sweden' even again, I'm going to have to build a damn time machine at this point.

are you swedish?

I don't think anyone here is swedish

No, but I've met some while in the military

good

so shut the fuck up about their problems

Oooooooohhh

oof

invading a nation because you think what they are doing is wrong is really, really dumb

independent of your reasons

7-1 never forget

nigga, we still have 5 world cups

>england
>penalty kick

The third world mentality will spread to other Euro countries (because how can cucked Brits fight this?)

And then the US will have to close off access to Europe eventually.

hey, that goal was pretty, pretty awesome

dude, if you can't see for yourself how dumb and wrong this is, i can't help you, for real

```i can't help you```*I'll invade you

If you can't see how Leftism is ideological AIDS, then idk

Britains own system is actively stiffling the individuals trying to save it.