BETTER QUALITY OUTPUT

Oh, ok

but again, take into account previously mentioned

WHO

WHO?

DR. WHO?

W.H.O.?

Europe was infinitely larger than Russia, which was itself, not entirely European

I HOPE IT'S DR. WHO

CORRECT

NOT ENTIRELY EUROPEAN

AS DOSTOYEVSKY SAYS

RUSSIA MUST FIND ITS OWN IDENTITY

SINCE HAVING EUROPEAN RULERS DID NOT QUITE WORK

AND IT WILL HAVE TO CHOOSE

EUROPE OR CHINA

Dostoyevsky was entirely wrong

And he came to realize that

All of them did

WHAT NIGGA U TRIPPIN

SORRY

I MEAN, "IN WHAT WAY?"

That's why event called "Russian Civil War"

Again

let's not move towards contemporary events which are far far divorced from what we were talking about

which is Old Europe and Russia within it

Dramatic things happened in meantime

Gazilliosn were resettled, killed etc

"EUROPE HAD SOCIAL TIERS"

So did Russia, even more so, and even more firm and established

I must also notice, that the entire story does not lack an element of grim humor

German elite single-handedly orchestrated the deconstruction of social order in Russia itself

Only for later ideologists in Germany to observe how Russia is an "unruly" society in it's substance

Since, rid of it's elite and it's form

There was nothing else left

Again, needles to say, Germany later paid the price of this herself the most, being ravaged to the ground by a force which no longer knew the courtesy with which Tsar Peter the III conducted his relations with Germans

Bomb the Russians

I DENY ANY LEGITIMACY TO THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION

EXCEPT THE RECOGNITION THAT DIVERSITY DOES NOT WORK

BUT YOU HAVE TO KEEP IN MIND

I GREW UP WITH RUSSIANS

AND PREFER NEGORES AND MEXICANS

I deny any legitimacy to such qualifications

Again, let's not drift into partisanship

BIG POINT IS: DIVERSITY FAILS. EURASIA IS NOT EUROPE.

I'm not "fond of Russians" myself if that's of any special meaning, other than women who can posses great sensibility

However, bear in mind time period and TOPIC we are speaking about which is about as far away from the pathology of diversity and Russians within it as it can be

It's the same thing as if i rightfully, qualified "Westerners" according to behavior of English and American tourists

Which would be absolute nonsense

RUSSIA NATIONALISM IS OVERSTATED

YES

THEY HAVE NO SINGLE ORIGIN

I AGREE

THEREFORE IT IS TEMPORARY

NO

EXCELLENT

I DONT AGREE

AND DIVERSITY IS SHIT

NOT TEMPORARY?

HMM

NO

I DO NOT SEE IT LASTING IN ITS PRESENT STATE FOR LONG

I SEE IT RETURNING TO ASIATIC ROOTS

IS AMERICAN NATIONALISM OF MULTIPLE ORIGINS OR TEMPORARY ?

THE LOWER IS ALWAYS STRONGER

YES

But

AMERICAN NATIONALISM? THERE IS NO SUCH THING

THERE IS WASP NATIONALISM

some kid brought an article into class today which showed that there was evidence that "there is no doubt that medieval Europe was a diverse multi racial society" and i'm like.... no. just no. did you even pass Western Civ I? and then he started talking about how there is nothing to fear from a multiracial europe or america. i asked him what his name is since I haven't heard much from him all year. now that I know his name he's not going to pass 😄 also having kids read churchill's account of the Boer Wars is a super red pill for many. indeed in class today i asked them if it was possibly genocide to let the africans vote. one girl looked like she was going to cry

EVERYTHING ELSE IS CONFUSION

You are very mistaken about Russian sense of "ethnic", similar to Johnson who claimed the same

just thought i'd share

Russian ethnic isn't about citizenship

SWEET @Jossi

YOU TROLLED *AND* EDUCATED

I LIKE THE THOUGHT OF THEM CRYING

THEIR FRAGILE FAKE WORLDS COLLAPSING

@The Enlightened Shepherd RUSSIAN SENSE OF ETHNIC IS BASED IN IDEA OF RUSSIAN-NESS

that look is pretty common in my classes. it's the look of the wool being pulled away from their eyes

BUT THIS COMES FROM MULTIPLE ROOTS

THUS IS UNSTABLE

anyway as youi were

@Jossi THEY ARE GETTING THE EDUCATION THEY PAID FOR, BUT NOT THE ONE THEY WANT

However, even if Russian sense of ethnic was strictly defined, it does not exclude the possibility of "involution" of race so to speak

Since even ethnic identification is not mix-proof

and when talking russian identity dont' forget to talk about the "Russian soul" the dusha

GOOD POINT

@The Enlightened Shepherd If that is the true, then how do you differentiate between ethnic Russians and ethnic Tatars

AND THE IDEA OF THE MOTHERLAND

They occuppy same land and even same cities

How do they know who is who

THERE MAY BE DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS

Or Russians and Ukrainians

BUT THE TATARS ARE SOMEWHAT DISTINCT

UKRAINIANS APPARENTLY JUST VOTED TO BE PART OF RUSSIA AGAIN

How about Cossacks

DIFFERENCE SEEMS ACADEMIC AT THIS POINT

DISTINCT ETHNIC GROUP, BUT NOT PARTICULARLY RELEVANT

IF THEY ARE RECOGNIZED AS DISTINCT, IT IS THEIR DIFFERENTNESS