chat
Discord ID: 350739775214583812
336,450 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 81/3365
| Next
i think
then the system would be unreliable and it would be dependent on the whims of the people who are greedy, once again @Blood
some of these people who make their own things will not willingly give them up for free
@Composers Pef and I are agreeing on something - make @๐Quatroking๐ (๐ณ๐ฑ) a mod again, please
as such it all comes tumbling down
it REQUIRES a central system of distribution to funciton
@Extra Crispy right they wont need to give anything for free, when the others can produce for themselves
it DEMANDS it
then it literally just turns into bartering marketing all over again
remembers the people have the means for production
a man will not hand over his cows, sheep and milk just because jimbo on the other side of the nation says so
@Extra Crispy and thats fine
as such it will collapse
it'd be like an officer making an order only for the people he orders to just ignore him
but also in modern days there are collectives such as in latin america, that literally mean, we all work, we all eat, they contribute to growing the food, and they all eat
the military chain of command would explode
lol
but also in modern days there are collectives such as in latin america, that literally mean, we all work, we all eat, they contribute to growing the food, and they all eat@Extra Crispy
Is it hate on quatroking hour?
no
thats how socialism works
just because 'there are,' doesn't mean 'they all work effectively'
Shouldn't be.
I mean, I like Quatro
@Extra Crispy and its up to them to sort it out
He's a calm, level-headed, rational user and former moderator who knows how to adequately handle situations as they come up.
yes
i'm real as fuck
how many more times are you willing to try this system that keeps failing?
@CaptainDynamite 1400 users
it is literally dependent on a system that is inherently unstable or centralized
He's also good at accurately utilizing the necessary talking points and information in discussions with leftists.
@Extra Crispy decentralized actually
no
And is, in my opinion, a stable moderator.
Unlike some others.
Thanks @Extra Crispy for explaining all of this in more depth
if it is decentralized then there will be no logistics system
no prob
if it is centralized then it would have a logistics system
logistics as in to distribute the goods?
godammit i should be asleep.
if it had none, then the people would be left to handle their resources themselves, and as such it would not be a certainty that they'd even leave their hands
Where did you find that picture of Quatro's mother, @futurestorms?
do you know what logistics means?
@Fusion She gave me it last night.
it is effectively the transport of materials, be it goods or otherwise
yea
if there is no planned transportation of goods or otherwise, then one half of the nation could be filthy rich with food and the other side starving
they would transport as needed
and there'd be no way to transport that food
says you
ok, so how do you plan on transporting goods without a central planning authority?
@futurestorms You need to get yourself checked.
lol there is already examples of it being done, ratehr than just yourr wishful thinking
carry shit across a field with wagons?
You may be turning blue yourself.
railways would be impossible to run without planning or organization
lol no a dem gov, handlling it'
LOL
there is already examples of it
the 'dem gov' will not wish shit into place
human hands would need to operate a system to which they would work at transporting goods
This always comes down to the socialists seeing that the government is the better means or way for them to have thse goods distributed, and that's why it's always turned out that way
at the whims of the 'dem gub' telling them or not
@Extra Crispy right and so human hands would operate
@Fusion before i get myself wrecked.
Because it's quite obvious that there's no guarantee the workers are going to be efficient, able and 'equal' in undertaking it.
yes, but what would stop them from forming an autocracy and organizing as a group to just control who gets what for whatever reason?
the dem gov
they have no power over them though
the logistics are literally handling the clossest thing to money
um, you do realize there is still a military in these nations right
what, is a military going to stop them?
there are still laws
what's to stop the military from taking over then?
magic 'dem guv' wishes?
what is stopping the venezulan military from taking iver now?
sory bud
they're already being paid through food provided by the logistics
since there's no money
there are real world examples of this
what is stopping the venezulan military from taking over now?
yes, and none lasted more than 1 month without collapse or invasion
venezuela is in collapse
there is very little preventing their military from just taking over
when they stop paying them probably will be the moment it happens
but why is it in collpase, is it because "socialism" or because of the economic warfare and over the top sanctions being imposed by the u.s?
336,450 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 81/3365
| Next