thats how socialism works

just because 'there are,' doesn't mean 'they all work effectively'

Shouldn't be.

I mean, I like Quatro

@Extra Crispy and its up to them to sort it out

He's a calm, level-headed, rational user and former moderator who knows how to adequately handle situations as they come up.

yes

i'm real as fuck

how many more times are you willing to try this system that keeps failing?

@CaptainDynamite 1400 users

it is literally dependent on a system that is inherently unstable or centralized

He's also good at accurately utilizing the necessary talking points and information in discussions with leftists.

@Extra Crispy decentralized actually

no

And is, in my opinion, a stable moderator.

Unlike some others.

Thanks @Extra Crispy for explaining all of this in more depth

if it is decentralized then there will be no logistics system

no prob

if it is centralized then it would have a logistics system

logistics as in to distribute the goods?

godammit i should be asleep.

if it had none, then the people would be left to handle their resources themselves, and as such it would not be a certainty that they'd even leave their hands

Where did you find that picture of Quatro's mother, @futurestorms?

do you know what logistics means?

@Fusion She gave me it last night.

it is effectively the transport of materials, be it goods or otherwise

yea

if there is no planned transportation of goods or otherwise, then one half of the nation could be filthy rich with food and the other side starving

they would transport as needed

and there'd be no way to transport that food

says you

ok, so how do you plan on transporting goods without a central planning authority?

@futurestorms You need to get yourself checked.

lol there is already examples of it being done, ratehr than just yourr wishful thinking

carry shit across a field with wagons?

You may be turning blue yourself.

railways would be impossible to run without planning or organization

lol no a dem gov, handlling it'

LOL