So that's why claim it's not an argument.

brainlet

also @NormieCamo is right

>Brainlet.

why didn't God just use telepathy

because you are using logic to explain the texts

You win

More angry republicans equals more eager republican voters

why didn't God use sign language

but then tossing aside logic

to explain the text

why didn't God do it any other way

you can't have it both ways

So yea let them try to impeach

womans are illegal or SHOULD be illegal?

either the text is logical

No, we CAN apply logic, but God isn't always in those bounds.

or it's not

We’ll just reap the rewards

@RemoteBeef092 I never said God is bound by logic, I said that interpreting the text *depends* on logic

To get and understanding, but if we're incapable of understanding it then God is out of those bounds.

so you can't just deny logic when your texts fail

God did not use sign language, this is silly because God didn't need to talk

God not real

No, it doesn't fail, your brain is incapable to comprehend it, humans in general are.

My argument isn't that there is no God, my argument is that Yahweh is not the God of the universe based on the evidence of contradictions to o.o.o. traits that God has.

You just seem to think you know all, and if you can't understand something it must be flawed in a way to keep you from understanding it.

Applying logic to the text is not faulty, you literally must use logic to apply hermeneutics.

Oh you are anti-OT

I thought you might be going pagang

there is not God, is Gad cause is woman.

@RemoteBeef092 I don't "know it all" but I know enough to say that you can't both affirm and deny logic

if you do that you result in relativism

which is what you people engage in

These texts are also being applied to God in some cases.

That's the point.

with the OT-NT dichotomy

dude

the whole bible is applied to God

you can't have it both ways

I'm saying directly God.

either you affirm logic and look at the text from a logical perspective, applying context and what not where have you

or you deny logic

and the whole thing becomes entirely incoherent

because then every convention of logic you can no longer use

because "God"

as you said

You can apply it to everything, but there will be points that you're not able to comprehend.

the claim is that the entire bible is inspired by God

therefore if you cannot apply logic to what is inspired by God

Inspired by

then you cannot do hermeneutics

if you cannot do hermeneutics

It's not God directly.

then you can't interpret the text

the chinese are weirder than i thought

if you cannot interpret the texts then it's all meaningless

That's some big brainlet logic.

see how your argument fails?

The Bible isn't God.

I never said the bible is God

It's God's word.

I said that it's inspired *by* God

I said you can't apply logic to God as if He's in those bounds.

and that logic can be applied to the bible because logic comes from God

@Thule-Gesellschaft [☩] accept my friend request so I can DM you

in fact it necessarily must come from God

because a priori assumptions don't make sense otherwise

on september 14th, that is august 14th on the chinese calender. on that day you eat moon cakes

You said we can't do the same to the Bible in that case.

So, you basically did.

my chinese coworkers give me one

it was so strange

i hate chinks

@RemoteBeef092 dude, you *can* apply logic to God

because God is the source of logic

order

etc

You can, but you wont be able to comprehend.

the o.o.o. traits are entirely consistent with logic

your argument is literally "you juss don't understand maaan"

that is not a strong argument

You literally just looped back to the start.

no I didn't

Yes you did.

I explained in detail why you fail

you're either too stubborn or too stupid to see why you fail

We're back at: "Bible contradict too much"

yes, it contradicts the o.o.o. traits

in many cases

Or you could be too "stupid" when it comes to the Bible.

No, because I am applying logic.

Which is required in order to do hermeneutics.

Aka interpreting the text

Considering I literally just said God isn't confined to logic.

I never said the being of God is confined to logic though

Do you have a better example than God speaking to Satan

I said that text inspired by God is

If He isn't confined to logic then of course you're going to find parts that appear to contradict or don't make sense.

why? because God is the source of logic, and because you cannot help but use logic to interpret texts