you cannot both use logic and not use logic to interpret the texts

that is a fallacy

and results in a dialectical relativism

Mainly speaking of the directly God portions

in which you arbitrarily say "lol God" when something sounds dumb

this is why there's so many Christian sects btw

No, you CAN use logic the whole way through.

you cannot agree on an objective truth because you apply relativistic thinking

to hermeneutics

But that doesn't mean you'll understand even 25% of it.

so your argument is that the creator of the universe gave us scripture we wont be able to understand?

why give us the scripture then?

He gave us plenty enough to understand what we should on earth.

clearly we are meant to understand

but you just said

You're complaining about irrelevant portions right now.

75% of it we cannot really comprehend

so why then inspire people to write it?

no I'm not

they're not irrelevant

irrelevant to what we're commanded to know.

they are highly relevant and they collapse your world view

which is why you're so defensive

How do they collapse anything?

Strawman.

1) because it shows you think relativistically 2) because it contradicts the o.o.o. traits 3) because it shows an inconsistency

"Oh look, contradict, they collapse world view"

That's not a strawman

It's quite extreme.

the correct argument here is to apply logic to contextually form the argument that this is a literary figure

not just to say "lol you just don't understand"

Anyways, I'm done, because it's literally just a massive loop.

well if I don't understand, who's to say your apologist explanation is an understanding?

who can understand then?

it's not a loop

We can't at the moment, God said we'll understand in Heaven.

you're just not very well read on philosophy

I love how you throw out insults constantly.

That's not how to argue.

I didn't intend to insult

it's just a fact

"Maybe you're just too stupid"

ur dum canadian

I never said you're stupid

I just said you're not well read

let me scroll up.

It's just that if you understood philosophical principles you wouldn't be saying things like "we can't understand the bible or God". God is necessary for logic to even exist.

I actually don't care, just making a point.

maybe you're stubborn, I never outright said you're stupid

Point being, shows you're mad if you're going to start being like memeboy earlier.

I'm not even a tiny bit emotional about this

If you say somone's too stupid or stubborn to be x, either way it leads to the same result.

Women are illegal

I explained in detail why you are wrong. The conclusion as to why you didn't bend yet is stubbornness or stupidity. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just chalk it down to stubbornness.

😬

My interpretation of the text may be incorrect

and if that's true then I hope God will have mercy

I just want to know what is true

but logic being applied to the texts is not negotiable

you necessarily must do so

there is no way *not* to do so

It's all true, but the point being we literally can't understand all of what the Bible says while we're human.

but by that logic, why would God have us read it in the first place?

why even write it down

He gave us what we need to last on earth, be saved, how to live, etc.

but you just said he gave us more which we cannot understand

why would God do something so superfluous

knowing we will never understand it anyways

Yes, which we will be knowing of in Heaven.

I think you're just over rationalizing a clear contradiction

S

He gave us more proof than we need, is that a bad thing?

that map is fucking retarded

you gave up so many white states for Hongcouver and eskimos

@RemoteBeef092 The purpose of the bible is for people to read it correct? Why would God inspire writings which cannot be comprehended?

Again, the incomprehension part is dumb, there is no reason for it.

Spit on her

S

S

S

S

1) God works in ways we don't understand 2) I consider it interesting and something to ponder about until Heaven.

S

S

.
🦀 WOMEN ARE ILLEGAL 🦀
🦀 WOMEN ARE ILLEGAL 🦀
🦀 WOMEN ARE ILLEGAL 🦀

being that we'll understand it in Heaven.

@RemoteBeef092 But if God works in ways we don't understand, how can we say for sure it's God? 2) I think you're over rationalizing theology which is not consistent

Are you still going on with your socalist bullshit?

Ohhhh man you just don't stop

@Weissest me like open border for long nose tribe

@Thule-Gesellschaft [☩] How can we not?

I am not Jewish.

@RemoteBeef092 by looking at the text and finding inconsistencies with God's necessary traits

I stress the word necessary

You don't listen very well.

prove to us you're now Jewish