brainlet

also @NormieCamo is right

>Brainlet.

why didn't God just use telepathy

because you are using logic to explain the texts

You win

More angry republicans equals more eager republican voters

why didn't God use sign language

but then tossing aside logic

to explain the text

why didn't God do it any other way

you can't have it both ways

So yea let them try to impeach

womans are illegal or SHOULD be illegal?

either the text is logical

No, we CAN apply logic, but God isn't always in those bounds.

or it's not

We’ll just reap the rewards

@RemoteBeef092 I never said God is bound by logic, I said that interpreting the text *depends* on logic

To get and understanding, but if we're incapable of understanding it then God is out of those bounds.

so you can't just deny logic when your texts fail

God did not use sign language, this is silly because God didn't need to talk

God not real

No, it doesn't fail, your brain is incapable to comprehend it, humans in general are.

My argument isn't that there is no God, my argument is that Yahweh is not the God of the universe based on the evidence of contradictions to o.o.o. traits that God has.

You just seem to think you know all, and if you can't understand something it must be flawed in a way to keep you from understanding it.

Applying logic to the text is not faulty, you literally must use logic to apply hermeneutics.

Oh you are anti-OT

I thought you might be going pagang

there is not God, is Gad cause is woman.

@RemoteBeef092 I don't "know it all" but I know enough to say that you can't both affirm and deny logic

if you do that you result in relativism

which is what you people engage in

These texts are also being applied to God in some cases.

That's the point.

with the OT-NT dichotomy

dude

the whole bible is applied to God

you can't have it both ways

I'm saying directly God.

either you affirm logic and look at the text from a logical perspective, applying context and what not where have you