reminder that furies are somehow still alowed to exist

@transience do u have that pic of danny

@Julian https://www.reddit.com/r/yiffinhell/comments/a780d4/babyfur_creep_hops_in_app_dev_servers_looking_for/

what the fyug

@Jake what is your take on the furry discord drama?

>discord now allows furry loli shit

Worst timeline

We don’t.

I think redditors are just misinformed.

what about this?

Side note
"Will Metro Exodus ever return to Steam?
Yes - Metro Exodus will return to Steam and on other store fronts after ***14th February 2020***"

What about it?

Do you know what he was replying to?

yeah sec

>allthefoxes

To be very clear if it’s sexualizing minors it’s not allowed. Plain and simple.

https://twitter.com/sierra_bat/status/1005243611246678016

(several pictures in post)

I think there’s a misunderstanding.

But if it’s sexualizing minors it’s not allowed. Plain and simple.

mayb someone should clear it then

what about this then?

We replied on the subreddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/discordapp/comments/aknrs9/another_confirmation_from_an_earlier_message_and/ef6tdah/?context=1000 this?

thats not very good reply

Please explain why you think that.

does that mean that loli and shota is fine too???

no

its bad

only danny porn allowed

zambz was banned for shota

sigghh

huohhhhhh

*for being shota

but he was shotta

If it sexualizes minors it’s not allowed.

If any content does.

So yes. If it’s Loli/shota yes. And this is in our community guidelines.

what if its 2d and they look 15 but theyre really 36

????

is tht allowed

They look 15

So no.

what if they re 36 but identify as 13

why is reddit going on a rampage against the T&S guy

what even happened

i dont know any of this

lmao at the downvotes honestly

i love it when reddit gets riled up for any reason

but lolis and shotas arent human???

could you clarify this for us @Jake

this is important

@transience zambz is human

what is there to clarify

read the bold part

so it is allowed???

it only mentions humans

🤔

https://twitter.com/sierra_bat/status/1005243889404596224 inb4 this server continues to live on

There was no downfall for furies
They were degenerate all along

Wait, posting lolis +18 stuff on discord literally sends you on the list?

TIL

@Jake the optics on this decision are very, very bad. You realize this, I'm sure. I think you guys should backpedal extremely hard right now

Fire the everliving shit out of that fucking degenerate, deny that his words were sanctioned, and tighten down across the board on porn. That's what I'd do.

But then again, I don't literally suck dick

first they came for the cubs

and we said nothing

I feel like if they fired the allthefoxes dude the furry community would interpret this as a war against them

but I bet that wont happen since theres probably a fuckton of furries working at discord

>I have to put up with the most random ban I ever got and don't get a response while furries get fast responses in regards of having their pedoshit

What a world we live in

@Julian The problem is the whole "we" deal

Who is "we" when the whole company is composed by people with obvious different perspectives and outlooks?

This is why official statements need to happen *before* anything like this surfaces

Then again, I don't blame anybody but the furries for thinking that their pedoshit could get a special pass just because "they're not humans" or "it's drawn" (second one is also an argument you'll see a lot of weebs make)

As of now I haven't heard of anybody claiming that this is a specific attack against furries, and I hope it stays that way, I don't need more retards saying pedoshit is ok

kek

🍿 🎦 👀

i don't think it's really anything bad enough to get outraged over, since it's not actually illegal

having a very biased support member is not good though

selectively applying rules is shit

>i don't think it's really anything bad enough to get outraged over

Where have you been living in the past decade?

toddlercon is horrible, babyfur is... confusing and horrible, but not actually illegal

People have been getting up in arms for dumber things

>normalizing pedophilia
>not worth getting outraged over

i don't have high expectations of furries

>not enough to get outraged over
>don't have high expectations of furries

Interesting

i mean, getting mad at that specific support team member is right, but it doesn't represent discord as a company

<:googlethink:328536447219138561>

I think that by saying "we" that member does represent discord as a company

^

My point exactly

i mean that it doesn't represent discord's views on it, that it's a single biased support team user that interprets the rules in that (faulty) way

discord making an apology and taking appropriate measures on that support team dude would be enough

since it's not the company endorsing furry toddlercon

@Jake discord should ban all anime weeaboos

@gecho Agreed, but until they do that, it's safe to take that support team members actions as representative of Discord as a company, since they are acting in an official capacity when saying that.