daily-debate๐ฌ
Discord ID: 539598595448504320
3,861 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 12/16
| Next
Coconut oil cures cavities
Lol no
Healthy diet also helps dental health
Xylitol is definitely effective. But fluoride helps with remineralization which is why it has been great for oral health.
Yes.. I've cured many on others and myself
That's the smartest thing you've said
Propolis cures receding gums
Ohh it's one of those places?! Can't cuss here?! This place is gay.. I'm out โ๏ธ
I mean bad diet is why you see a lot higher rate of cavities in the poor population
Yeah.. but the xylitol-gum is easier to use *immediately* after eating. To late too brush off acid 10h later.. ๐
Awesome. Maybe we can have some people with a brain have a discussion here now. Like everyone else.
that's quite teh sames w the milk
Yup. I mean fluoride isn't the make it or break it part of cavities. The main thing is brushing and flossing.
So I guess you could go either way on fluoride as long as you take care of your teeth, but I don't think it can be debated that it has been really good for oral health. Cuz you'd be surprised how terrible people are at taking care of their teeth.
In dental school the majority of people that came in had disgusting teeth and gums
g
exactly
he radiation thing kinda sounds like bs
lol
maybe time doesnt exist
only timelines
false god
= idol
u dont know your radiation number man
lmao
jk
The debate is not about whether fluoride is good for dental health... No one is debating that... This is about the neurologist effects from long term consumption
is it dumbing us down?
Depends on the research you read
Lots of stuff is dumbing us down
It doesn't because it's such a benign amount
@Xiyilqa it's difficult.. is this movie I'm watching on tv tonight called Dr. Strange actually enlightening me or dumbing me down? .. y'know whut I mean?
Hmm
There is ยฌ only one doctor. : p
Oh yeah? Who? ๐
Appealing to credentials logical fallacy thinking education means you're an expert on whatever you think you know about the topic of fluoride.
How ludicrous.
But just to appeal to the credentials you so highly adore, here's a Harvard study. Enjoy.
Lol
Probably don't like vaccines either do ya
Don't be a condescending, ***and ignorant,*** prick if you're not going to debate my sources.
Wanna debate vaccines? That'll be even easier than fluoride.
Lololo
***Fight me!***
Start with that
Vaccines cause adults
First 20 minutes will destroy ***ANYTHING*** you have to say on the topic.
Enjoy.
Alright I hope your kids get measles
I hope you get a fucking brain
Oh,, look! ***FEDERAL SOURCES!!***
Lol
Oh, but vaccinations are good!
Fucking dumbass.
Yes they are
No
No personal insults please
So nobody should get vaccines. Then what would happen.
I gave you every source you would need to ***PROVE*** otherwise
He said he hopes my children get measles so fuck insults. Tell hin.
Tell him that
I mean it for both of you
Fair enough
Vaccines are one or the greatest medical advancements of our lifetime
@Burg do not say stuff like that again
Then why you guys tagging me
My evidence that you are deliberately ***IGNORING*** say otherwise.
And say what?
Read something
Insults
What insult
No insults please. Imma have to go now
No quarelling please
You don't get the measles vaccine you're open to getting it
It's a fact
No
You're arguing from a position of ***Extreme Ignorance***
So you aren't open to getting measles by not doing anything about it?
Either look at my evidence or concede. You only have those two options in a debate.
You don't get to make ludicrous and ignorant claims without looking at opposing evidence.
So you think you're immune to measles without a vaccine?
That's not how debates work. Take just 20 minutes to watch that video. It's an hour long video, but the first 20 minutes are more than sufficient.
Just because?
Why are diseases that ravaged past populations gone now then?
Stop ignoring evidence
Tackle te presented evidence before bringing up anything else, please. This is a debate.
One you are very clearly losing.
You're not answering my questions either
I don't need to. I brought up evidence, first.
Cool bro
I hope your kids die
I will tackle your questions ***After*** we tackle the presented evidence.
What evidence?
@The89thOptimist 89Do something about this dude, please.
Give me a serious scientific article and I'll look at it.
Nope. You're done.
Yes do something about the guy that actually follows science
But you don't.
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Burg#1936 was muted***
I presented clear evidence with FEDERAL sources. You presented ad hominem attacks.
And deliberately ignored evidence.
@The89thOptimist Thank You and I hope all is going well.
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science-news/new-meta-analysis-confirms-no-association-between-vaccines-and-autism
New Meta-analysis Confirms: No Association between Vaccines and ...
The first 20 minutes of the video will destroy any argument you think you have.
Federal source says otherwise
Again, refer to at least 20 minutes of the video I presented or you are debating from an intellectually dishonest position.
Later
I'll post it again
They don't even go through clinical trials.
Every pharmaceutical must go through a double-blind placebo clinical trial before daring to introduce them to the public.
Vaccinations... dont.
The companies that make these vaccinations aren't even held liable for adverse health effects so you can't sue them if your child wants kids, but a vaccination sterilized them. Or any other health-related issue that comes about from being vaccinated.
Not to mention the horrendous ingredients list.
Formaldehyde? You know... What they put in corpses to keep them from rotting and decaying.
Think that's healthy to pump into an infant? Or any human, for that matter?
What about the aborted baby fetuses? Body parts that were ripped from a baby are chopped up and added to vaccinations. Perpetuating the abortion industry, on top of having aborted, and foreign, human DNA pumped into your bodies, via vaccination.
I'm vaccinated and I don't have autism
Or do I
Lol
@TheGhostScientist i cant judge the American situation, but thats absolutely not true here in Europe
No clue about all that
i do recall that we don't use saline placebos during testing, but thats for the pretty simple reason that it isnt really ethical
if a placebo for a regular old treatment fails to show results, you stop adminstering the placebo and switch to real medicine
but a vaccine placebo leaves people exposed for many years, and cant really be reversed if they _do_ catch an infection
They aren't tested on ***anything.***
Also, the first 20 minutes of the video will explain most of concerns pro-vaxxers have about not vaccinating. As well as information and evidence of how harmful they can be.
All with verifiable federal sources.
>be pro-vax
>but don't take m urself
>profit
again, i dont know or care much about the American situation, but i know thats emphatically not true for Europe
Sources, please?
do you speak dutch?
Not exactly
oof
ill try and see if i can get you some english-language stuff then
whats the exact claim you'd like proof for?
I guess there isn't one, at the moment. Let's start out with an ingredient list.
yeet
ill give you the initiative
It was your claim that European vaccinations weren't the same so I'd like you to back that up.
oh, i think you got me wrong
Perhaps. The way it ran seemed that way.
i dont know or care if my information applies to America or not, just like i dont know or care if it applies to China or Indonesia or whatever other faraway country you'd like to name, but i do know that vaccines as they are adminstered on this side of the Atlantic absolutely _are_ subjected to rigorous testing
Produce those testings.
again
thats gonna be rather hard if you dont speak dutch, but ill try
Well, aren't they mostly form GlaxoSmith-cline?
Test should be sufficient for both areas.
I'll look at all opposing opinions or arguments. I'm not gonna ignore or refuse to examine any evidence.
But are the tests done that well is diff question.
i'd like to be clear on the fact that i am not necessarily pro-vaccine--i just think that its silly that so many Americans like to think that their (admittedly terrible) legislation on the subject is somehow universal
I'm not saying that, but I am saying nearly every vaccination should be avoided at all cost. Some people might be able to fight off the effects, but they ***will*** affect many.
So.. ten seconds of research shows this..
do you have a similar position on the rest of modern medicine?
If I find adequate reason and evidence of what they affect, then of course. I haven't gone through all of the pharmaceuticals because there are far more of those than vaccinations, but I intend to.
i see
what course of action would you recommend one who is in need of medical services in one way or another to take, then?
Antipsychotics and Antidepressants suck
If someone breaks an arm, you're of course going to need to deal with that, accordingly. However, when it comes to the pain management, there could be other forms of relief without addictive narcotics.
oh, on that we can agree
well... what would be an easy alt for m opioids?
Kratom?
That's all ik
Yeah, those are pretty nasty bits. Weight gain, added depression, suicidal thoughts from altering your brain chemistry, insomnia, addiction, your body slowing and eventually ceasing the production of certain chemicals.
Yes, antipsychotics and antidepressants are horrendous.
opioids _can_ be warranted in very extreme circumstances (i have a mate who fell out of a flat once and broke every bone in his body)
the problem with them is more that they are prescribed for every remotely annoying little ache
Docs get arrested now for prescribing it
Yes, I don't agree with how commonly they use it.
So people get in pain because it's so bad the epidemic
Used it. You're right, they have stopped that for a large part.
opioids also arent really addictive if they're used for extreme pain relief only
gotta survive on aspirin then?
that only happens if they're used frivolously (aka, in 99% of the cases)
Aspirin will kill you as well
the friend i talked about earlier was under morphine 24/7 the first few months after the accident, but had no withdrawals whatsoever when they took him off of it
Interesting
but you gotta keep in mind that falling five stories is not exactly a typical case
Yea lol
Perhaps, the body needed it, as you suggested and if he stopped the moment he was able to stand the pain on his own or it got better quick enough, then sure, I can see how it may not affect him.
yeah, that was the idea
im kind of afraid that the current backlash against frivolous prescription of opioids, which is absolutely justified, will lead to opioids also being withheld when they are necessary
Is it partly just that ppl avoid pain too much today?
perhaps
Those should be used for extreme cases, and to a fair degree they are, but I also think had the pharmaceutical industry not become what it has (profiting from keeping people sick, rather than curing them) then we could combine natural herbs with advancing knowledge in medicine to keep from creating harmful substances.
You all talking about floride or what?
the very purpose of pain is to tell the body 'oi m8, something's amiss here, you better patch that up asap', so i dont think you can hold it against people that they dont like it
but as a society, the western world has definitely developed an unhealthy ideal of pain avoidance
Here you go. Fluoride ๐
what do you recommend as an alternative for toothpaste, by the way?
It's way too little fluride in the water
To do anything
Not true
I thought i heard that somewhere
Fluorosis is a thing for that very reason
Too much fluoride
eating bones and hard bread.
XD
@Ubo Tea Tree Oil and Baking Soda
Salt as well
Very little salt
f-ton of sea-salt
<:mk:511588951811817480> Is Climate change a Hoax to fund a communist global government through carbon taxes? <:mk:511588951811817480> @everyone
Topic is changed
no
it's just another way to tax the working class
No
alright, im just going to say the following: a 'communist government' is a contradictio in terminis
It's real
climate change is real, but a carbon tax is not the solution.
Too much evidence
communism as it was proposed by Marx and Engels is basically anarchism with a collectivist slant
Climate change is real. Air pollution is real. But taxing aint it chief
^
If you appeal to authority then you'll believe climate change is man made.
Climate change has a large backing because of funding
That said, 72% of pollution is caused by corporations
There's no empirical or statistical evidence for human influence on climate in such a substantial enough way that it is a threat to humanity.
Carbon taxes are a punishment, we should spend the same but reward companies who self regulate and don't emmit
much of that pollution is caused by the manufacture of consumption goods
Ayo carbon taxes, you breath too much? Now you will be fined
Have a nice day
I thought gore said cause of climate change ice would melt.. fake news
Gore isn't a scientist
He's a politician
Gore said the Earth would die in 2016
๐ ๐ ๐ ๐
Some say fast growth of co2 will make a short hot-period... (less than 20y) - but then a fast ice-age
This was in a way a mainstream-belief still in 60-80s
what changed then?
We learned more
but what more??
It is kept oddly silent
why isn't it so anymore
and in 20 years will they "learn back" to it?
maybe they lost the way to know like nasa lost teh tech
ugh
thats a persistent myth
i think carbon tax is an excuse to fund the new world order
NASA didnt 'lose the tech', NASA lost the ability to replicate pieces of technology that are by all means ridiculously outdated, just like volkswagen cant churn out a 1969 beetle any more, and moog doesnt have the tools to build a 1969 system 55
well... it will happen eventually anyways... like every single time before
Get back on topic
If we cant keep on topics in daily debates ill just stop doing it
Science has been wrong initially before, the way we learn things is initially we make a prediction. Take the concept of plate tectonics, our theory had holes in it to begin with, but as more evidence was gathered the theory was improved until we have out current understanding today. Back in the 60s the majority of reports supported the fact that temperatures were rising due to greenhouses.
@Normal Man aye
science is a method of acquiring and perfecting knowledge, not that knowledge itself
that science is willing to change when it finds itself proven wrong should be taken as a token of its reliability (and the other way around: when the academic establishment maintains a position in the face of increasingly overwhelming evidence, thats usually a sign that something is being covered up or suppressed)
What caused climate-changes before?
Solar activity
3,861 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 12/16
| Next