Theories

spamming links dont validate an argument

I am asking you @Champion to give us proof

spam one link

i am convinced

no

rip

Spamming links don't validate any argument

lol

<:HA:511590629592006656>

lmao

very convincing

Give us a model for the flat earth with accurate representations for everything

I'm more curious now as too what you think takes the place of this theoretical gravity that's holding us down @Champion

Are you fucking serious?

Holy fucking shit

right... ya I have a question to the great flat earth fools... how about the tides... without which you would not be here?

@Post-LSD Swamp Did you see the image of density and buoyancy

>Density and buoyancy

lol

cringe

Flat earthers confirmed fucking retarded

lmao I searched it up and got htis

But how am I stuck to this flat earth if there is no gravity??

again, read what i said 30 sec ago

Density and buoyancy<>

?

and what is supporting your claim

There is nothing that you can ever say to anyone with a brain that uses logic that would convince them that the earth is flat. Nothing.

So density is what's keeping me stuck in this uncomfortable office chair?

but a picture you got from pornhub comment

Lol

Wut

lol

wut

it is called gravity...

Why do two different objects fall at the same speed then?

<:epic:511591544357388288>

@Post-LSD Swamp what makes heavier objects sink and lighter objects float @Post-LSD Swamp

Ohmygod

You can drop a piece of metal, and a rock, they'll both fall at the same speed

Test it

This is so dumb I honestly cant think of an easier way to ask the same question

Density or not density? @Post-LSD Swamp

What is the force that causes objects to fall ?

then why are you still stalling

do you really need me to copy paste the question again

Or to literally not float away past the ass wall

Density is a thing

I get that part

So gravity isnt real, it's actually density taking its place?

@Post-LSD Swamp What-Makes-Lighter-Objects float, and heavier objects sink? Density or not density?

That doesn't prove anything

beating around the bush again @Post-LSD Swamp ?

@Champion give me lighter object that floats on earth

You're the one that's beating around the bush

The density, or more precisely, the volumetric mass density,

For a pure substance the density has the same numerical value as its mass concentration. Different materials usually have different densities, and density may be relevant to buoyancy, purity and packaging. Osmium and iridium are the densest known elements at standard conditions for temperature and pressure but certain chemical compounds may be denser.

You haven't been able to fully answer any of my questions

it can be easily debunked

Ok

@Post-LSD Swamp I'm asking y-o-u. I muted the others

by Galileo's Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment

No. You're obviously a troll. I cant be live I fell for this bait

I'm an idiot

*runs away from a simple question

oh ok

Idiots still have a brain @Post-LSD Swamp

so you could still give an adqueate response

<Density>

I honestly dont know what your question is

What do I need to give a response to?

ok i'll repeat it for the 50th time

Thank you

@Post-LSD Swamp What-Makes-Lighter-Objects float, and heavier objects sink? Density or not density?

In reference to the image provided @Post-LSD Swamp

Density and buoyancy

Okay thanks.

@Champion give me one object on earth

that floats mid air

i can unmute the others now brb

So how does that supplement gravity on flat earth

@Champion that is the pinnacle of the occult you know; the “ties” between what the elements embody physical and consciousness/spirituality... it’s why the freemasonic cults have numerology behind reality...

It renders gravity invalid because the theory of gravity's force was non existent in that scenario @Post-LSD Swamp

i like the nick @CNN Fake News

nick ?

Who's nick????

@Mr.J do you watch David Icke ?

name call sign ID toetag whatever noun you prefer to subscribe to

almost every fact of astronomy is proof that all flat earth believers are wrong. Gravity, the star field, the rotation of the planets, The rotation of the sun (sun spots) the tides, the difference of the length of shadows on the earth, comets, the structure of galaxies, The fact that there are other galaxies.

Indeed

All theories <>

It is not even an argument it is just proof of the others inability to learn anything about the universe.

Right... because light is a "theory"

oh we should believe the astronomers because they have been to other imaginary "galaxies" to verify their claims

or they had speed checks to measure how fast the other "planets" spin

in that argument NOTHING you just said is anything but your 'THEORY"

or you just take their word for it

NO I am a scientist and have my own telescope.