international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1686/3012
| Next
10/10
yall niggas
fucking perfect plan
mind if i
yeet on dem fasci
@Erysichthon good luck then
You didn't even know about that? @[Imperialist Loli]
It's in there.
This nigga right here yeeted on 2 fascis in his life time
Ok, Good to know
i will make Spartacus looks like a fucking liberal
Ok, nice goal
niggers are the master race
white genocide? good stuff
Ok
be my gf(male)
@Erysichthon Lenin was white tho
Nah, im fine
pewees uwu
@Workingman lenin was actually african
@Workingman Well, I think communism takes the cake as the worst ideology of all time
communism is not an ideology
Or at least now I do
x.x
Your right
It's a disease
no
even better
It's a system of liberation from the capitalists.
a virus
*@[Imperialist Loli] it is indeed an Aurora ship
it grows in the cells of capital body
transforming the body of capital against itself
That's great!
*Communism - Kills more than Hitler but still is loved* Ok
@Erysichthon Lenin was african?
@Deleted User ummmmm nig that socialism
Aurora is a beautiful ship
Very interesting history behind it as well
@Workingman cant i shitpost?
@[Imperialist Loli]
"Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.
But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social."
for real tho communism is scary
thats y i love it
it is so fucking nightmarish
I didnt really study yet socialismn or Marxism soo I can really have a argument between the two ideologis diferences exept both are in the far-left
look
socialism is retarded
communism tho that shit is lit
@[Imperialist Loli] it's even better when on a beautiful women. Everything is better this way.
In a proletarian society, everyone belongs to everyone else.
>
no fucc off
>proletarian socaity
could u fuck off dirty socialist?
The family of course is a hindrance to this society, as it promotes reactionary ideas.
Yeah
@Erysichthon You ar enot Bolchevike but you act like one
Communism is the annihilation of the proletarian condition, not the management of it @Workingman
read Dauve
I'm a Marxist-Leninist personally, but @Erysichthon doesn't seem like he is one.
>ml
ew
how many ML countries has failed till u will learn that i wont work like that
It's merely outside influence that caused them to fall. The traitors to the working people caused the downfall of these great countries.
>
how unhegelian and unmarxist
The bourgeois will always try to reinstate capitalism.
The structure of your ML states is simply incompatible with a geopolitical world
You cant have a bubble theoritcal state
fuck
so your strategy is doomed
k mr:i will keep doing the same shit all tho it always fail
Are you saying that no ML states exist as of now?
Or are you saying something else?
I am saying they will always fundamentally fail.
Cuba is still around.
It fails when you start moving away from the idealogy
always
cduba is a shithole
cubda
NK is still around
:dab:
Capitalist propaganda.
^
@Azaz3l >we were not pure enough
>it is corny socialism
fuck off both of u
China still isn't full capitalism
These places are shit to live in
no one want to live in a socialist state
SU failed because it got infested with demograds :--DDD
That's what the capitalists want you to believe.
and careerists
k nigs
SU was gonna colappse
before stalin fixed it
The kulaks deserved everything they got.
not that mate
the societal structure
didn't like it was gonna collapse in 30-40-50s
was completely fucked
in the SU
Enemies of the people must be dealt with too though.
it was working perfectly well and reaching 10% GDP growth during its best years
that wasnt the decicive move though
lmfao
"muh gdp"
that's now what i'm on about mate
USA has high GDP
is it a healthy country?
fuck no
same with SK
constantly building new schools and improving social environment ?
Of course not. Socialism in one country worked amazingly.
improving social conditions etc
the shattered the family unit
and everyone was a fucking mess
with tons of stray kids
STDs etc
Shattering the family is what NEEDS to happen.
Abolition of the family.
USA is the dominant country in the world now, no?
t. autistic marxist leninist
lmfao
and it has a fucklot of contrast between rich and poor
it's gonna fall soon
Yellowstone ?
look what happened to the blacks in the uS
or National Debt?
they're fucked
Yeah, even the right thinks it is going to fall too.
(((USA))) is cancerous
^
well if it falls the entire world is fucked as well then
while I agree USA is cancer
nah
why would it be?
cause European niggas and China depend on USA economy as well
too many ties due to globalisation
lol
europeans will be fine
USA just fucks with everything
USA is a meme state anyways, just a bunch of europeans, blacks and spics merged into a multi-ethnic mess
China depends on US whattt
Technology importing, US product manufacturing etc
or you think the chinks can do it all by themselves?
Without USA market China is going to have hard times
But is not depending anyhow
anymore
i mena
*mean
china collapsing would be great
lol
The capitalist state may collapse into a communist one
maybe
china's a tumor eitherway
They'd have to adjust and change some structure
But they would be fine
@Firefly "The capitalist state may collapse into a communist one" Well, according to Chinese Communism, capitalism is the only thing making the country alive
No they will have socialism by 2050!!!
china has corporatism
prove me wrong
once again, the libtards are defenseless against my superior wit and intelligence
ok boyyos
i made a essay on maoism
should i post?
Hell yeah my dude
Yeet
maoism:
So basically, there are a couple concepts that maoism adds on. Remember maoism is just adding theory to Marxist-Leninism and most maoists call themselves ML since they are they just use current material conditions. Maoist concepts are: New Democracy, Third Worldism, On Contradiction, Mass Line, Peoples War, Cultural revolution, Dual Power etc. New democracy: is characterized as a concept based on Mao Zedong's "Bloc of Four Social Classes" theory in post-revolutionary China which argued originally that democracy in China would take a decisively distinct path, much different from that of the liberal capitalist and parliamentary democratic systems in the Western world as well as Soviet-style socialism in Eastern Europe. As time passed, the New Democracy concept was adapted to other countries and regions with similar justifications. Mass Line: The essential element of the mass line is consulting the masses, interpreting their suggestions within the framework of Marxist-Leninism, and then enforcing the resulting policies.Mao developed it into a coherent organizing methodology that encompasses philosophy, strategy, tactics, leadership and organizational theory that has been applied by many Communists subsequent to the Chinese revolution. Chinese communist leaders generally attribute their conquest of power to the faithful pursuit of effective "mass line" tactics, and a "correct" mass line is supposed to be the essential prerequisite for the full consolidation of power.
Third Worldism: which is a broad tendency which is mainly concerned with the infusion and synthesis of Marxism—particularly of the Marxist–Leninist–Maoist persuasion—with concepts of non-Marxist Third Worldism, namely dependency theory and world-systems theory. There is no general consensus on part of Maoist-Third Worldists as a whole. However, the majority of proponents typically argue for the centrality of anti-imperialism to the victory of global communist revolution, as well as against the idea that the working class in the "First World" is majority-exploited (sometimes arguing that it experiences no exploitation at all), and therefore, it is not a part of the international proletariat. People's war: also called protracted people's war, is a military-political strategy first developed by the Chinese Communist revolutionary and political leader Mao Zhedong. The basic concept behind People's War is to maintain the support of the population and draw the enemy deep into the countryside (stretching their supply lines) where the population will will bleed them dry through a mix of mobile and guerrilla warfare. Basically encircling the main cities.
Cultural Revolution: The theory of the Cultural Revolution states that the proletarian revolution and the dictatorship of the proletariat does not wipe out bourgeois ideology—the class-struggle continues and even intensifies during socialism, therefore a constant struggle against these ideologies and their social roots must be conducted. Cultural Revolution is directed also against traditionalism. On Contradiction: Mao drew from the writings of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin in elaborating his theory. Philosophically, his most important reflections emerge on the concept of "contradiction". In two major essays, On Contradiction and On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People, he adopts the positivist-empiricist idea (shared by Engels) that contradiction is present in matter itself and thus also in the ideas of the brain. Matter always develops through a dialectical contradiction: "The interdependence of the contradictory aspects present in all things and the struggle between these aspects determine the life of things and push their development forward. There is nothing that does not contain contradiction; without contradiction nothing would exist". Furthermore, each contradiction (including class struggle, the contradiction holding between relations of production and the concrete development of forces of production) expresses itself in a series of other contradictions, some dominant, others not. "There are many contradictions in the process of development of a complex thing, and one of them is necessarily the principal contradiction whose existence and development determine or influence the existence and development of the other contradictions". Thus the principal contradiction should be tackled with priority when trying to make the basic contradiction "solidify".
Mao elaborates further on this theme in the essay On Practice, "on the relation between knowledge and practice, between knowing and doing". Here, Practice connects "contradiction" with "class struggle" in the following way: Inside a mode of production, there are three realms where practice functions: economic production, scientific experimentation (which also takes place in economic production and should not be radically disconnected from the former) and finally class struggle. These may be considered the proper objects of economy, scientific knowledge and politics.
Agarian Socialism: Maoism departs from conventional European-inspired Marxism in that its focus is on the agrarian countryside, rather than the industrial urban forces—this is known as agrarian socialism. Notably, Maoist parties in Peru, Nepal and the Philippines have adopted equal stresses on urban and rural areas, depending on the country's focus of economic activity. Maoism broke with the state capitalist framework of the Soviet Union under Nikita Khrushchev, dismissing it as revisionist, a pejorative term among communists referring to those who fight for capitalism in the name of socialism and who depart from historical and dialectical materialism.
Although Maoism is critical of urban industrial capitalist powers, it views urban industrialization as a prerequisite to expand economic development and socialist reorganization to the countryside, with the goal being the achievement of rural industrialization that would abolish the distinction between town and countryside. Dual Power: I will keep this short and sweet. It is saying that you need capitalism to construct socialism. We see this in marxist theory but not practiced by ML states. By capitalism i mean limited but regulated markets to do construction and build a economy. We see this in old china and the USSR in the NEP. This is a basic concept i won’t spend time on.
This is maoism.
@please refer to new discord Boring and you spent a waste of time on that wall of text that would never be read fully, and could be summarized in a paragraph.
Not to mention, that mao's policies were a complete disaster in nearly every sense, somehow worse than stalin, and the khemer rouge, while not helping his country in any sense, while destroying any cultural, religious, and family identity the nation had all for the sake of his failed view of marxism
TLDR: Wipe out tradition to preserve true communist ideology and prevent Bourgeois influence from ever rising again.
@Workingman Wow that sure turned out great didn't it?
Just summarizing it.
It isn't like china is one of the biggest capitalist markets today.
I'm no maoist by any means.
stalin had to revive tradition
becouse the USSR was collapsing
@HardMan That ain't no tradition that I see.
he did though
didn't
@HardMan How so?
mostly with being softer on orthodox church
fixing marriage
banning homosexuality
just being relatively based
still a commie, sure
but not as bad as lenin
he didn't ban homosexuality
he didn't "fix" marriage
he wasn't softer on the church
your definition of "based" is not stalin
he criminilized homosexuality my man
Article 121
and no legislation against lesbians (they aren't real)
fack ye
now THIS is some good music
song name?
49 faggots 1 dune coon
also check this @HardMan
Jews need to be gone
Goyim unite !
>tfw Jesus was natsoc
Oof
@Deleted User >according to Chinese Communism >Business Insider
At least I have arguments
You don't
Hi
Good luck Bolchevikes to defeat us
Ya. Bolsheviks are fags
Nobody can break the chains
NOBODY
Xd
What makes a nation unique is theirs chains
U alt right?
Lol
The knowledge of were we came from and what our ancestry died for
I'm not alt right
Ik
U should join LTE server
It's lit
Witch one?
Let's talk elections
There are people of almost every party
Socialist and communist and there too
@Deleted User I assume ur a commie, rite?
Well, far as I know Dollfuß got ride of the Red scum
Dollfuss?
Engelbert Dollfuß
?
My heroesl
Idk
752,937 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1686/3012
| Next