Message from @please refer to new discord
Discord ID: 454095751698579457
Agarian Socialism: Maoism departs from conventional European-inspired Marxism in that its focus is on the agrarian countryside, rather than the industrial urban forces—this is known as agrarian socialism. Notably, Maoist parties in Peru, Nepal and the Philippines have adopted equal stresses on urban and rural areas, depending on the country's focus of economic activity. Maoism broke with the state capitalist framework of the Soviet Union under Nikita Khrushchev, dismissing it as revisionist, a pejorative term among communists referring to those who fight for capitalism in the name of socialism and who depart from historical and dialectical materialism.
Although Maoism is critical of urban industrial capitalist powers, it views urban industrialization as a prerequisite to expand economic development and socialist reorganization to the countryside, with the goal being the achievement of rural industrialization that would abolish the distinction between town and countryside. Dual Power: I will keep this short and sweet. It is saying that you need capitalism to construct socialism. We see this in marxist theory but not practiced by ML states. By capitalism i mean limited but regulated markets to do construction and build a economy. We see this in old china and the USSR in the NEP. This is a basic concept i won’t spend time on.
This is maoism.
@please refer to new discord Boring and you spent a waste of time on that wall of text that would never be read fully, and could be summarized in a paragraph.
Not to mention, that mao's policies were a complete disaster in nearly every sense, somehow worse than stalin, and the khemer rouge, while not helping his country in any sense, while destroying any cultural, religious, and family identity the nation had all for the sake of his failed view of marxism
TLDR: Wipe out tradition to preserve true communist ideology and prevent Bourgeois influence from ever rising again.
@Workingman Wow that sure turned out great didn't it?
Just summarizing it.
It isn't like china is one of the biggest capitalist markets today.
I'm no maoist by any means.
stalin had to revive tradition
becouse the USSR was collapsing
@HardMan That ain't no tradition that I see.
he did though
didn't
@HardMan How so?
mostly with being softer on orthodox church
fixing marriage
banning homosexuality
just being relatively based
still a commie, sure
but not as bad as lenin
he didn't "fix" marriage
he wasn't softer on the church
your definition of "based" is not stalin
he criminilized homosexuality my man
Article 121
and no legislation against lesbians (they aren't real)
fack ye
now THIS is some good music
song name?
49 faggots 1 dune coon
Jews need to be gone
Goyim unite !
>tfw Jesus was natsoc
Oof
@Deleted User >according to Chinese Communism >Business Insider
At least I have arguments