@Anarchist-Communist No, it is genetic.

I mean, I am a white guy but often counted as hispanic.

No, I doubt you'll find an economist in the world who thinks that

Since I can speak spanish.

@Deleted User

Genetic on what level?

What makes it genetic?

I doubt you'll find an economist in the world that actually believes it existed.

You made that shit up.

THat's absurd

this sites layout is weird

I took 3 screenshots

and put htem together in pain.net

Maybe you can take some screenshots of the economic slowdown and put them together in here.

@Anarchist-Communist Hispanic is it's own race, it is spanish in it's origin.

apprently paleo conservatism, fusionism and clerical fascism are my most opposite ideology

@Deleted User I don't understand wwhy you think you could detect something that has no examples of it not occuring

@Deleted User ¿Entonces es genético que puedo hablar español? ¿qué estas diciendo?

@Deleted User Your propostion is as abusrd as asking to dispriove that air affects the economy on the moon

@Deleted User I don't understand why you think you couldn't detect something that has examples of it occurring.

@Deleted User WE know their is a slowdown as you had artificial factors dramaticalyl reducing rate of production

@Anarchist-Communist And, it is real funny to see how you manage to disprove yourself in the PDF, it shows in the bar graph that more blacks will commit violent crime, in nearly every case.

@Deleted User That says violent crime VICTIMIZATION

@Deleted User can you not read? Are you retarded?

@Deleted User If you can't provide me with any source material to support your claim then you're done.

what is victimization defined as in this context

can we get a link to the study

@Deleted User Guess i'm done, as I', just going to ask you to read an economics textbook or research into economics

It is defined as being the victim of a crime. @Deleted User cannot read.

any economist who knows what they're talking about would side with me

yeah but I still want a link

Sure.

like virtually all of them

I'm not going to have faith in an economic phenomenon that existed simply because you said it did. If you don't have any evidence, then you're done. I'm not going to take your word for it.

graphs is literally /pol/ tier arguements

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hpnvv0812.pdf

Go read it yourself.

I don't see how my word for it plays a part

competition increasing produciton is obvious

as does automation

like what planet do you live on

That's all you have to work with. You don't have any evidence to back up your claims. Now you're making it seem like that was your argument. It wasn't.. And we all know it wasn't. Nice try but you won't weasel your way outta this one.

yeah I'm gonan be honest this study clearly supports @Anarchist-Communist here

okay I guess I didn't escape your grasp?

Lol

I believe miscommunication is at fault in this situation

like it says if you are poor and not white you're more likely to be a victim of a crime

Instead of just admitting that you were mistaken, you chalk it up to a simple case of "miscommunication". Nice.

Competition doesn't increase production, demand does

Yeah because I know i'm right

Sure you are.

and virtually any economist would tell you that

Oh, I'm sure they would.

@Anarchist-Communist Hmm, now this is interesting, I read the whole document top to bottom, and all it mentions is VICTIMIZATION, NOT who is actually COMITTING the crime, not to mention that they were REPORTS to police, there was nothing mentioning whether or not they were legitimate or not.

interjecting thanks

@nerd where is this site?

http://politiscales.net @RobotWizard

@Anarchist-Communist If you were trying to convey that the poor were more likely to commit and be victimized by crime, then congratulstions, you succeeded.

Dude.

Admit to being wrong.

Holy shit.

what was the argument

@Anarchist-Communist I do admit that I jumped the gun on this, but it does not excuse that you were also incorrect.

@Deleted User https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/09/economic-history-2

there is about two different ones going on atm

here, i'll stoop to your level

lol, ofc there are

I would say look at history materialistically.

Do not look at it morally.

Morals are gay.

Morality is just your own bias.

Stop giving me Third Way ree

morality is fake shit

True.

this literally is taught in history

*"no i don't have feelings, cause feelings are gay"*

@Deleted User turns out most far leftist are relaly just liberals who knew

Haumea is actually a lib

she just doesn't know it yet

She

in my experience most "communist" aren't even demsoc they're styraight up third wayers

".. slavery was generally a highly profitable investment which yielded rates of return that compared favourably with the most outstanding investment opportunities in manufacturing"

How is that a defense?


@Deleted User

And I'm a social democrat, and proud of it

@Deleted User How about you read the fucking article

so you are a lib

^

@Deleted User I kinda just did, and I fail to see how it defends your position. In fact, it contradicts it.

@Deleted User troll

blocked

I'm further left than Obama and the Clintons at least

honestly i'm not one to shit on soc dems most of them are decent folk

^ no

in person at least

Nice. Block me for pointing out how an article you linked actually contradicts your claim.

betters than nazbols or facists

>"i'm left of HRC"
congratulations you are left of the right wing of america

@Deleted User if you support free trade and gun control you're reactionary

@(((RobotWizard)))#3986 fascist aren't real

disarming people is bad