why

why

why

why

read

@Deleted User keep switching the subject and spamming the only joke you tried to make in the last hour.
You're obviously suffering.
Could you see those reactions on my comments?
That means that MORE than three parties are involved, and they are rooting for me.

@wizzy www.ask.com

edgy lol

Remember, I know you won't accept defeat now, and I can go on all night. And the longer you go on, the more it will hurt when you loop it again and again when you realize you were wrong and just willlignly ignorant.

So

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus >Avoids doing the essay in order to stroke his ego more
Kek, come on mate.

Please. Just because I throw in an insult now and then don't misunderstand me. This is not the break yard of your elementary school. This is a political debate server. And I'm having a debate WHILE insulting you. You're ONLYtrying to insult me.

So

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

I have too much freetime on my hands, I can stay up all night as well, so come on, if you really have nothing better to do with your life, then we can play this game all night.

edgy

"I won't argue your simplest form of argument in any way, but I demand that you write me an essay or I win the debate xD"

Are you honestly 16?

i guess you can be a loser without drugs too

@wizzy www.ask.com

👍🏻

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus You seem to not be taking this seriously at all either, seeing how you have been using ad-hominems all night in order to stroke your ego.

you have been, though

@wizzy I will admit that.

@Dasus >Using ad-hominem attacks
Only a brainlet non intellectual would do such a thing.

You seem to be making the fallacious argument that I'm trying to state my point by arguing a position about your person.
You are mistaken mister, and should read up on philosophy.
I'm making a point AND making an attack on your person. Two different things.
Its and ad hominem if you only argue your position through devaluing your opponents person without the argument in itself not having essense.

You know, like you not debating my simplest points or the several studies I've linked and instead saying that "all druggies are losers"?

That's a nice example of a text book ad hominem.

Who agrees. Thumbs UP!

(I mean, I can keep humilitiating this babe for a while, but I might prefer to go watch the rest of Brooklyn Nne Nine. I discovered it yesterday and I'm only in the third season.)

@Dasus >Babe
Oh thanks chad.

@Deleted User So back to ignoring everything I say and switching the subject?

@Dasus Whatever you want to call it, I am just the one making replies to your 5 paragraph long comments that I do not read for the most part.

>reads all of it

>damn i don't hvae anything to say...

>lol im not reading this loser addict

@Deleted User so you're argument is that you aren't reading any of my arguments, so just ignoring everything, so you just admit you aren't actually debating anything, but still keep desperately replying even if I keep making this about the basic arguments which are:

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus I said a long time ago that I did not care at all for arguing, so why do you keep going on about it?

I think you've realized how confused your replies have been from the minute I logged on here, but your ego just won't let you stop answering, even though you have absolutely no essence in your replies. You just keep yapping and yapping and yapping .

Yeah.

Oh wait.

I think that metaphor gave me the idea to use my old friend Google, whom I constantly need, since I can't find anything online ever, without it, so everything I know is wrong, to search for an image of you.

https://media.giphy.com/media/y5011C1VhvTwI/giphy.gif

FOUND IT!

a better time

@Dasus >Says that I won't stop talking
>Goes on about how he is an intellectual and supposidely stuided one topic for a decade

dude stop talking lol

>Claims himself that he won't stop talking either

@Deleted User oh don't get me wrong, I've studied SEVERAL controversial issues for almost a decade.
Still.

https://media.giphy.com/media/y5011C1VhvTwI/giphy.gif

Oh whops, wrong CTRL-V

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus Looks like much of it didn't stick.

That or you looked at articles online since you were a little child and call that studying.

You see, the difference is, is that you're trying to DERAIL the conversation, while I'm trying to keep it on its rails. Which is the subject of

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

Anyhow, you should actually stick to your word and go away like you said 8 times before.

@Dasus Seems like you have a lot of work on your hands then if this keeps gettting derailed by me.

@Dasus Gave up trying to reply to that?

No, I really don't. I just have to keep insulting you and copying the basic argument.

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

Nah man, I'm just simultaneously having Voice chat on another server

because this became too easy and at this point you're just gathering it for yourself

Well I wonder what keeps you going if this is all you are going to do all night.

You've honestly trying to ignore every single person who was in this conversation, who were on my side? Everyone of the simple arguments I made?
Are you unable to reply to simple arguments, or will you give up arguing for the prohibition?

@Dasus Oh boy, I wonder why I would do that if I did want to debate.

Come on, I can tell you are starting to get tired, so actually go ahead and watch that TV show like you claimed you were going to do.

No I'm debating on another channel.

How long are you willing to keep making an idiot of yourself?

Simple arguments bro, but you ican't handle them?

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus That didn't stop you before from making multiple paragraphs about how huge your ego and dick is.

Oh, I actually have a huge dick. But this isn't about me. This is about you being unable to answer to simplest fucking arguments, even if you engaged in this conversation with that pretense.

tldr: You can't read, but you pretend to

@Dasus Oh boy, it seems that your ego is possibly larger than that of the entire universem

No, that's not possible, if you knew simple logic.

Keep dodging the subject bro, you're getting pretty good at it.

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

tldr does the set of all sets contain the set of all sets

@Dasus >He does not get a rhetorical question
What a brainlet.

Oh, wait a minute. Still not answering the questions about the obsessive ignorance?

Such Shock.

@Dasus Doge memes are the best.

So, you're just trying to have a stance as to not having made fun of yourself by being an idiot?

Do you think you will remember this later, when they end the prohibition?

I bet.

I'm betting your nuts are 75% inside you right now.

@Dasus Oh no, I am having boatloads of fun.

Oh while evading the subject?

Wow, so you're practicing to be a teenage girl?

Kek, sure.

I thought this was a political discussion server, not a Maroon 5 concert.
(And yes, I had to use google, since I had no idea what is currently popular music.)

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus I guess you were wrong.

Oh in that your ego keeps you from admitting that you've been acting a fool all this time and you'll make a painful memory and the more you stretch it out the better it is for me.

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

Would you like me to relink all the several peer-reviewed studies on the effects of drug policy reform, or would you like to admit you are wrong in defending the prohibition?

@Dasus Nah, I am just talking to more than one person at once.

@Deleted User and that makes those arguments invalid how?

Answer: they don't.

Why do you feel like pretending to be smart is such an important thing?
I mean, I get the need, you might be young.
I used to be young, and I'd debate people and be cocky about it.
But damn it, I'd DEBATE them. I'd DEBATE the subject, and IF I was outwitted, I'd admit defeat, because admitting defat and realizing your own mistakes is the fastest way to self-improvement which is, at least for me, a goal in life.

@Dasus I am just going to go ahead and discard that.

You can keep up this thing, but you need to find some essence in your argument, even if you are holding your position out of pure egoistic arrogance.
Otherwise you'll just appear like a clown.
If not, you need to shut the fuck and live to fight another day.

@Deleted User oh the way you've discarded all the arguments, evidence, links, and the hours and hours of simple arguments I've made about this subject, and in the way you said you ignore most of the things I say?

You see, saying things like that just makes my work easier.

@Dasus Yep.

You don't realize, this isn't about me. This isn't about us.
This is about the people who will later enjoy this.
The internet is forever. ❤