@Dasus I said a long time ago that I did not care at all for arguing, so why do you keep going on about it?

I think you've realized how confused your replies have been from the minute I logged on here, but your ego just won't let you stop answering, even though you have absolutely no essence in your replies. You just keep yapping and yapping and yapping .

Yeah.

Oh wait.

I think that metaphor gave me the idea to use my old friend Google, whom I constantly need, since I can't find anything online ever, without it, so everything I know is wrong, to search for an image of you.

https://media.giphy.com/media/y5011C1VhvTwI/giphy.gif

FOUND IT!

a better time

@Dasus >Says that I won't stop talking
>Goes on about how he is an intellectual and supposidely stuided one topic for a decade

dude stop talking lol

>Claims himself that he won't stop talking either

@Deleted User oh don't get me wrong, I've studied SEVERAL controversial issues for almost a decade.
Still.

https://media.giphy.com/media/y5011C1VhvTwI/giphy.gif

Oh whops, wrong CTRL-V

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus Looks like much of it didn't stick.

That or you looked at articles online since you were a little child and call that studying.

You see, the difference is, is that you're trying to DERAIL the conversation, while I'm trying to keep it on its rails. Which is the subject of

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

Anyhow, you should actually stick to your word and go away like you said 8 times before.

@Dasus Seems like you have a lot of work on your hands then if this keeps gettting derailed by me.

@Dasus Gave up trying to reply to that?

No, I really don't. I just have to keep insulting you and copying the basic argument.

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

Nah man, I'm just simultaneously having Voice chat on another server

because this became too easy and at this point you're just gathering it for yourself

Well I wonder what keeps you going if this is all you are going to do all night.

You've honestly trying to ignore every single person who was in this conversation, who were on my side? Everyone of the simple arguments I made?
Are you unable to reply to simple arguments, or will you give up arguing for the prohibition?

@Dasus Oh boy, I wonder why I would do that if I did want to debate.

Come on, I can tell you are starting to get tired, so actually go ahead and watch that TV show like you claimed you were going to do.

No I'm debating on another channel.

How long are you willing to keep making an idiot of yourself?

Simple arguments bro, but you ican't handle them?

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus That didn't stop you before from making multiple paragraphs about how huge your ego and dick is.

Oh, I actually have a huge dick. But this isn't about me. This is about you being unable to answer to simplest fucking arguments, even if you engaged in this conversation with that pretense.

tldr: You can't read, but you pretend to

@Dasus Oh boy, it seems that your ego is possibly larger than that of the entire universem

No, that's not possible, if you knew simple logic.

Keep dodging the subject bro, you're getting pretty good at it.

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

tldr does the set of all sets contain the set of all sets

@Dasus >He does not get a rhetorical question
What a brainlet.

Oh, wait a minute. Still not answering the questions about the obsessive ignorance?