Message from @wizzy

Discord ID: 371430415304753154


2017-10-21 22:49:03 UTC  

why don't you go to the library

2017-10-21 22:49:08 UTC  

why don't you do studies yourself

2017-10-21 22:49:25 UTC  

@Dasus Seemed like you should have rememvered more... unless you blew it all out your ass.

2017-10-21 22:49:35 UTC  

Stop. Switching. The subject. You're being intellectually dishonest, and its not going to work with someone who is intellectually above you on this subject. I'm not proposing I'm more intelligent as a whole than you, but I am observing that in this instance you are acting really naively.

2017-10-21 22:49:39 UTC  
2017-10-21 22:50:02 UTC  

@Deleted User I do remember more. I could literally write down a 300- page essay on the drug policy reform off hand

2017-10-21 22:50:13 UTC  

but since you aren't arguing even the simplest points, whats the point?

2017-10-21 22:50:19 UTC  

I said "why"

2017-10-21 22:50:21 UTC  

not what

2017-10-21 22:50:22 UTC  

you're just making this longer and longer for yourself

2017-10-21 22:50:27 UTC  

why do you use a search engine @Deleted User

2017-10-21 22:50:49 UTC  

@Dasus Sure, go ahead then if you are hopped up on crack and want to do something productive.

2017-10-21 22:50:57 UTC  
2017-10-21 22:51:35 UTC  

why

2017-10-21 22:51:35 UTC  

why

2017-10-21 22:51:36 UTC  

why

2017-10-21 22:51:36 UTC  

why

2017-10-21 22:51:37 UTC  

read

2017-10-21 22:51:40 UTC  

@Deleted User keep switching the subject and spamming the only joke you tried to make in the last hour.
You're obviously suffering.
Could you see those reactions on my comments?
That means that MORE than three parties are involved, and they are rooting for me.

2017-10-21 22:51:42 UTC  
2017-10-21 22:51:51 UTC  

edgy lol

2017-10-21 22:52:17 UTC  

Remember, I know you won't accept defeat now, and I can go on all night. And the longer you go on, the more it will hurt when you loop it again and again when you realize you were wrong and just willlignly ignorant.

2017-10-21 22:52:27 UTC  

So

2017-10-21 22:52:28 UTC  

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

2017-10-21 22:52:43 UTC  

@Dasus >Avoids doing the essay in order to stroke his ego more
Kek, come on mate.

2017-10-21 22:53:45 UTC  

Please. Just because I throw in an insult now and then don't misunderstand me. This is not the break yard of your elementary school. This is a political debate server. And I'm having a debate WHILE insulting you. You're ONLYtrying to insult me.

2017-10-21 22:53:45 UTC  

So

2017-10-21 22:53:46 UTC  

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

2017-10-21 22:54:54 UTC  

I have too much freetime on my hands, I can stay up all night as well, so come on, if you really have nothing better to do with your life, then we can play this game all night.

2017-10-21 22:55:17 UTC  

edgy

2017-10-21 22:55:24 UTC  

"I won't argue your simplest form of argument in any way, but I demand that you write me an essay or I win the debate xD"

Are you honestly 16?

2017-10-21 22:55:25 UTC  

i guess you can be a loser without drugs too

2017-10-21 22:55:28 UTC  
2017-10-21 22:55:33 UTC  

👍🏻

2017-10-21 22:55:35 UTC  

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

2017-10-21 22:56:41 UTC  

@Dasus You seem to not be taking this seriously at all either, seeing how you have been using ad-hominems all night in order to stroke your ego.

2017-10-21 22:56:52 UTC  

you have been, though

2017-10-21 22:57:18 UTC  

@wizzy I will admit that.

2017-10-21 22:58:03 UTC  

@Dasus >Using ad-hominem attacks
Only a brainlet non intellectual would do such a thing.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/371431971529949186/download.jpg

2017-10-21 22:58:31 UTC  

You seem to be making the fallacious argument that I'm trying to state my point by arguing a position about your person.
You are mistaken mister, and should read up on philosophy.
I'm making a point AND making an attack on your person. Two different things.
Its and ad hominem if you only argue your position through devaluing your opponents person without the argument in itself not having essense.

You know, like you not debating my simplest points or the several studies I've linked and instead saying that "all druggies are losers"?

That's a nice example of a text book ad hominem.

Who agrees. Thumbs UP!

2017-10-21 22:59:12 UTC  

(I mean, I can keep humilitiating this babe for a while, but I might prefer to go watch the rest of Brooklyn Nne Nine. I discovered it yesterday and I'm only in the third season.)