Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 371433316320018433
edgy
"I won't argue your simplest form of argument in any way, but I demand that you write me an essay or I win the debate xD"
Are you honestly 16?
i guess you can be a loser without drugs too
👍🏻
1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance
@Dasus You seem to not be taking this seriously at all either, seeing how you have been using ad-hominems all night in order to stroke your ego.
you have been, though
@wizzy I will admit that.
You seem to be making the fallacious argument that I'm trying to state my point by arguing a position about your person.
You are mistaken mister, and should read up on philosophy.
I'm making a point AND making an attack on your person. Two different things.
Its and ad hominem if you only argue your position through devaluing your opponents person without the argument in itself not having essense.
You know, like you not debating my simplest points or the several studies I've linked and instead saying that "all druggies are losers"?
That's a nice example of a text book ad hominem.
Who agrees. Thumbs UP!
(I mean, I can keep humilitiating this babe for a while, but I might prefer to go watch the rest of Brooklyn Nne Nine. I discovered it yesterday and I'm only in the third season.)
@Dasus >Babe
Oh thanks chad.
@Deleted User So back to ignoring everything I say and switching the subject?
@Dasus Whatever you want to call it, I am just the one making replies to your 5 paragraph long comments that I do not read for the most part.
>reads all of it
>damn i don't hvae anything to say...
>lol im not reading this loser addict
@Deleted User so you're argument is that you aren't reading any of my arguments, so just ignoring everything, so you just admit you aren't actually debating anything, but still keep desperately replying even if I keep making this about the basic arguments which are:
1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance
@Dasus I said a long time ago that I did not care at all for arguing, so why do you keep going on about it?
I think you've realized how confused your replies have been from the minute I logged on here, but your ego just won't let you stop answering, even though you have absolutely no essence in your replies. You just keep yapping and yapping and yapping .
Yeah.
Oh wait.
I think that metaphor gave me the idea to use my old friend Google, whom I constantly need, since I can't find anything online ever, without it, so everything I know is wrong, to search for an image of you.
FOUND IT!
@Dasus >Says that I won't stop talking
>Goes on about how he is an intellectual and supposidely stuided one topic for a decade
dude stop talking lol
>Claims himself that he won't stop talking either
@Deleted User oh don't get me wrong, I've studied SEVERAL controversial issues for almost a decade.
Still.
Oh whops, wrong CTRL-V
1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance
@Dasus Looks like much of it didn't stick.
That or you looked at articles online since you were a little child and call that studying.
You see, the difference is, is that you're trying to DERAIL the conversation, while I'm trying to keep it on its rails. Which is the subject of
1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance
Anyhow, you should actually stick to your word and go away like you said 8 times before.
@Dasus Seems like you have a lot of work on your hands then if this keeps gettting derailed by me.
@Dasus Gave up trying to reply to that?
No, I really don't. I just have to keep insulting you and copying the basic argument.