are there also gay sexbots?

sexbots are putting coochie manufacturers out of business

😠

down with sex bots

coochie manufacturers

you mean women <:lol:521377935672737792>

Welcome

How’s the retardation

it's

spicey

Like an everything bagel

That was quick

Death squads

@Deleted User it's effectively anti collectivism

Imagine not being a collectivist

Imagine actually being a fucking (((kulak)))

@The Real Head Honcho imagine thinking the kulaks were the bad guys

>thinking otherwise

Oh dear.

They were mostly Ukrainians.

Kulaks were just greedy Ukrainian peasants who had for the first time been given a lot and let their families and friends die off so they could hoard an extra sack

They are the definition of social parasites

Yes mostly Ukrainian successful farmers

No

If they weren't Ukrainians I would care.

They replaced the Russian nobility

They weren't "successful" farmers

They replaced the nobility as small scale land barons, using other peasants as effectively slave labourers

Like the nobles had before the serfs were emancipated in 1861

The Kulaks did very little actual work themselves and just took the form of rich peasants that got rich via the expense of other peasants

Which led the country to multiple famines

First off I've seen no evidence of this, second that does not give these people the right to kill them

Including the holodomor

the kulaks are literally one of the main causers of the Holodomor

Sure, the state could've alleviated it to a degree, but they'd been teetering on the brink of starvation since lenin's implementation of War communism in 1918 and the New Economic Policy in 1921

They had very little grain in reserves to stop the famine

The Kulaks, on the other hand, consumed or burned or killed their stocks

I believe the estimate is 27 million livestock slaughtered rather than be given to the collective farm program

And an untold amount of grain hoarded, consumed and burned

Rather than be given away

What are Ukrainians?

And as for "evidence", literally just look at Russian farming methods after 1861

You mean stolen?

@εïз irma εïз what do you mean what are Ukrainians

Russians spelled with different letters

I mean what are they?

@Scipio Americanus stolen by who?

I have Googled this s*** many a time, I've seen no evidence of this still

The state

Stolypin's attempted land reforms were literally designed to combat the problem of a Kulak agriculture

And as for the state "stealing" the agriculture and livestock

Still no answer. What are Ukrainians? <:lol:521377935672737792>

The land was owned by the state, the state was either at war or suffering from horrendous post-war shortage, and the machines and tools used to harvest and cultivate the agricultural produce was provided by the state

The Kulak populations were exploitative and greedy, nothing more

They were a problem recognised as early as the 1880s

@εïз irma εïз people who aren't Russians

Vyshnegradsky tried to combat it unsuccessfully which led to the 1892 famine

Romanians and Ukrainians should all be deported to Pacific islands.

He was replaced by Witte who also tried, but to little success

Then Stolypin tried land reform which would've worked better, and was similar to the idea of the Kolkhoz, but he was killed in 1911

The Kulak problem was not a soviet problem

It had been present for a good 50 years by the time Collectivism was implemented in 1929

@The Real Head Honcho sure buddy, keep on thinking that, but I can tell you I won't be killing any my livestock for greedy reasons

I like your username but your profile picture is deeply unsettling.

And even after collectivization and the liquidation of the kulaks, there was huge agricultural issue all the way until the dissolution of the USSR

stalin did the best work for the agriculture

Nah

Khrushchev didn't do much with new ideas but expanded on what was there

And Brezhnev pissed it away like everything else

Gorbachev did the best

But the problem was never solved

@Mairon this tbh bring back gorbachev and let him break apart the world

Yes

@Mairon I actually really agree with that

Gorbachev was the best premier as he realised Communism doesn't work and exploded the union

No Stalin was the best because he killed the most communists.

I think he's a shithead if we're going with actual opinions

@εïз irma εïз f****** hot take

And yeah tbh Stalin killed more commies than hitler

Stalin was literally the best leader the Russians had in a *long* time

Unironically

Did wonders for the nation

Sure you can say "m-muh death toll!" But at the end of the day, people are a resource.

At the end of the day its subjective

If you value people or nation more

Personally I don't care about either

The needs and status of the nation surpass that of the individual in any sense

If you think it does, I could say the opposite, it wouldn't be any more true, states are projections of great men and ideas people think of

Yeah at the end of the day the entire concept is born from social stigma and a unity against a common enemy or drive for a goal

But that's philosophy bullshit and it is *not* what i want to discuss at 6am

Or the desire for power of an individual, the best reason obvs

Why is this tankie way more based than all of the rightoids here

Step up your game NEETs

Oof tankie

Who is the tankie

Me?

I have to assume you are because you're defending Stalin and shitposting against kulaks