Gorka said that he got more subs in the last hour than he has in 6 months. he thinks that they are SUPPORTERS signing up, kek

yep, you do need to

No I don't.

that is what you would have to show in order to make the statement 'your laws have been ineffective'

yep

you do need to

your time is running out

There will always be those who are disobedient and who view laws as something "oppressive and domineering" and those people are worthless anarchists that should be ruthlessly shunned by society and not even given any recognition

tick tock

why did he call himself America First podcast too?

waiting for that evidence

Those people are Communists

The reason the North Koreans are doing drugs is because they're severely unhappy, not because of the lack of laws in place. People don't immediately start doing harmful shit once it's legal.

@troglodytes yes

Are drugs bad, yes or no?

not an argument

No.

not even close to an argument

Is human trafficking's bad, yes or no?

Yes, it is.

nope

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.haaretz.com/amp/1.4970678

not an argument

Yes

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

Drugs are not bad?

Ok you have revealed your agenda

Fuck off Marxist bum

define drug

you are not even within 100 miles of making an argument right now, and the fact that you don't realize it illustrates your profound ideological myopia @Weaboo Kempeitai

lmao

https://www.rt.com/news/472250-pentagon-baghdadi-raid-video/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=push_notifications&utm_campaign=push_notifications

https://twitter.com/NigCringeForce/status/1189635852282089477

in order to make the claim that drug laws are ineffective you would have to prove that in all cases in all of history, drug laws never prevented even a single instance of drug use

hahahahahaha

which is obviously untrue

your bit about drug use having other causes is completely irrelevant

to the question of whether or not law enforcement can reduce drug use

ie

not an argument

bruh

We seem to have different priorities.

Gay

no, this is a purely empirical question

it doesn't have to do with priorities

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000b59d

there's no wiggle room, and no nuance to this particular question, you're just straight up wrong

drug laws do reduce drug consumption

I don't care about reducing consumption.

then don't say that the laws are ineffective

lol

Which one is the chad?

It dosen't serve the public. It's a net negative. A tiny reduction in consumption dosen't show them to be effective, because you would have to prove that reducing consumption reduces crime, and improves overall public happiness and wellbeing.

Stop promoting legal drug use under the guise of "oh the laws aren't effective or useful anyway" when in reality, you are a simple degenerate fiend and addict who would benefit from decriminalization. You don't care about peoples well being, you just want people to do whatever they want and to have no consequences for their actions. Drugs lower the general quality of life of the entire society and drag everyone down. People become dependent and cant function or experience pleasure without constant use of their substance of choice. Fucking scum

legal drugs should be avoided too

painmeds etc

There has never been a war on drugs, ever. And you never provided any proof that North Koreans are on drugs

Your just spewing fucking unbacked statements

first of all, you have no basis to say that the reduction in consumption is 'tiny' - that depends on the context of the laws and the state that is enforcing them as well as the nation they are being enforced on - they are probably ***very significant*** reductions in the United States, second of all we know that reducing consumption reduces crime and overall happiness because we know the effects of these drugs on societies

you just sort of want them to be 'tiny'

that has no basis in reality

its ideological cope

<:yay:638817157840502815>

nick fuentes lookin nibba

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:ASsipstea:581167433960783872>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

what's the problem?

she too much woman for you?

<:yay:638817157840502815>

yes im scared of powerful women

She looks like she needs 2 airplane seats

<:yay:638817157840502815>

<:yay:638817157840502815>

Jesus she's huge

for you

put her non a water only diet and make her run

Putin looks terrified

hes gonna get eaten any second

JABA

nah

hes just raising an eyebrow over soemthing being said

Spencer is on tonight

I hate when you have to sit next to fat people on the plane

are we taking bets on when Nick will lose his channel?

He's thinking "Was not good idea to be wearink barbecue scented cologne today..."

I am absolutely amazed Fuentes' channel still stands.

Anyone remember the "If I was gonna kill myself in Minecraft..."?