Hi dad

Hey buddy

How are ya?

U know

gay and a dad

yeah

And a bear

guybernate

@Mandatory Carry Not appease a psycho path, just don't poke the rattle snake. Military posturing isn't the only solution to the middle east.

But but, why can't we just kill everyone we don't like..

But I wannaaaaaa!!

@Shadows Fair point. We've legalized abortion. After all, there is no difference in killing an undeveloped western fetus and killing a backwards unenlightened Muslim.

I think we should abolish the electoral college, ebate?

debate*

@DJ_Anuz
The snake is coiled and *HAS* struck before... Recently.
@Shadows
Because that's rediculous. We don't like France and South Africa, nobody's said nuke them.

@Clive Just to let you know, when you are calculating things based on pure numbers, you won't normally get the outcome you want because humans aren't just math. But if you also have a good argument to go with it, it might be worth thinking/talking about.

Good math + good argument should be acquired

Ya, its not just good enough to say X number of people here = you win, because you don't always know how people will behave.

And you dont know if itll stay like that

Electoral college is to keep it fair, not to keep republicans winning

So 40 years from now it may be different, it may be backwards

@Shadows to be fair, I don't honestly think we should abolish the EC, I'm pointing out the irony of, if every red state had every eligible adult vote for who that state *generally* supported based on 2016 voting patterns, then Re > Dem because red states house more +18 humans than blue states, currently

can i attach the spreadhseet i made? so you can judge for yourselves?

idk how

Screenshot it put it in <#266396659062145025>

Or link it in <#266401012967931905>

Abolishing the EC would likely secure republican victories for now, but it would also be awful for future generations.

Could secure*

Yes

No way of knowing how fucked the future would be though

Not really something we need worry about, i'm working on homemade nukes, it will be over soon.

done

"if every eligible adult voted"
But that literally never happens

Indeed.

@Shadows
Don't joke too hard about that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn

David was an hero

Well... He did almost build a nuclear bomb and all...

"After his time on USS Enterprise, Hahn enlisted"

I don't remember this episode

*"After his time on USS* ENTERPRISE *, Hahn enlisted in the Marines and was stationed in North Carolina."*

(Normally I wouldn't, but there's some some things I can't and shouldn't be allowed to tolerate.)

@Mandatory Carry https://imgur.com/a/6y83HJ3

@Deleted User is actually @Shadows. Change my mind

@DJ_Anuz
¿Voice chat? He can't be logged on as both without blowing up vc...

I also thought he might be fake. He seems less aggressive than the first time.

He didnt even call me a Jew yet.

“Assault weapons” have but ONE definition; Automatic ᵃⁿᵈ/ₒᵣ burst fire compatible detachable magaᵶine fed firearms. If it’s semi-automatic, it’s NOT an "assault" anything.
You’ll note there is no refrence to caliber. That’s not an accident. Caliber doesn’t matter.

That's the definition of an "assault rifle", not an "assault weapon". You've already fell for the fake news

Yeah, assault weapon doesn't mean shit, especially if you go by what they try to ban to keep people from getting ahold of 'assault weapons.'

To be honest, as little as the gun grabbers actually care about fidelity of language, I'm surprised they don't just use the phrase assault rifle.

plausible deniability, perhaps? Directly using a defined term in the wrong fashion would be too obvious

so they came up with something really close and let the confusion come naturally

That's probably it.

Subterfuge

I'm a snekky snek

@C1PHER, @wolfman1911,
Great, good. ***YOU*** come up with a definition that I can't get around with clever engineering ᵃⁿᵈ/ₒᵣ marketing. Seriously, any answer you can give, I can get around... Except this one. It's a shame I can't put pictures here, I could defeat that "no such thing" _"argument"_ in two photos (1 if I could get them together).

"assault weapon" is a meaningless term - all weapons are used for assault which makes a knife an "assault weapon". it's a weapon for assaulting people.
it's a term that's meant to be grey enough so that each kind gets eventually all demonized and banned along the slippery slope

@Agent Smith
Pretty sure I proved differently...

#ReadingIsFUNdamental

Oh Hell, I used the outdated "box" requirement...

not really... the anti-2A people have redefined it since it's now the most common usage

@Mandatory Carry ^^

Really...
So I said "semi-auto rifles," ¿right?
And I mean both of you now.

What makes it 'proven?' That you were the one that defined it?

wolfman knows what I mean

That it can stand the test of time, yes even after phasers (or whatever) replace slug throwers.

I just had a DELICIOUS idea. 😈😈😈😈 (That means run. In five languages.)
***YOU*** define assault weapon, rifle, or whatever. Doesn't even matter. 😈😈😈😈

I didn't make the definition, society did by by accepting the anti-2a'ers redefinition

what don't you get about that

just discard that stupid term

I didn't accept Josh SUGGARMAN'S definition... And... 😈😈😈😈

I don't know who that is

...
¿Really?
Oh my. I get to give a history lesson. 😁😁😁😁
Josh SUGGARMAN was the original MandatoryBanFaggot. Around 1978, he was writing a tretise on the banning of ALL guns; However, REAGAN short-circuited his plan when FOPA's HUGHES Amendment was signed.
Rather than accept his agenda was destroyed, Joshy simply re-wrote his shitpost *"Assault Weapons And Their Accessories"* to re-define *assault weapons* as semi-automatic **RIFLES** (key word there, btw) fed by detachable **BOX** magazine (but not any other type of mag).

Here: http://www.vpc.org/studies/awacont.htm
Warning; I *said* it was a shitpost.

^Is this the literal definition of weaponized autism?

not exactly the "colloquial" use of the term

you still don't seem to understand that the common usage of the term has been diluted in the public sphere

I find the line *"The assault weapons threat is exacerbated by the fact that the weapons are difficult to define in legal terms."* to be particularly amusing, since it's really *QUITE* easy once you compare apples to apples.

It wasn't a very *good* joke, I'll admit @C1PHER

So semiautomatic shotguns fed by box magazines are not assault weapons?

¿Semi-auto **ONLY**? No.

AA-12 is free game, boys

Wait maybe I missed it @Mandatory Carry do you use a different definition?

¿Aren't AA-12's automatic? Let me double check and yes you dullard, just scroll up.

Theeeeere's the insult. Was wondering how long it would take.

I stand corrected, there ARE semi-auto only versions of AA-12.
Calling you a dullard isn't an insult. It's just a statement of fact, like *"The sky is blue."*

I'll happily sit for a competitive IQ test any time you want, bud.

I'll consider it...

Right now, I have THREE hills to climb... Under fire. From 36Ø°.

???

Also,

So you don't mind if I just refer to you as 'assclown' from here on out?

Seems reasonable in light of your own standard.

Call him Walter, because he's really starting to remind me of John Goodman's character from the Big Lebowski.

But that guy was cool....

When I act like one.. Sure. Then go ahead.
@wolfman1911
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I'd have said Sheldon, but ok.

¿See? The @Shadows Knows...

'When I act like one'. So every time, then. Roger.

...
Because you are pissing me off with your laziness and spam, @uncephalized, I will indulge you only in the desperate but ultimately futile hope that it will shut you up:
*"“Assault weapons” have but ONE definition; Automatic ᵃⁿᵈ/ₒᵣ burst fire compatible detachable magaᵶine fed firearms. If it’s semi-automatic, it’s NOT an "assault" anything.
"You’ll note there is no refrence to caliber. That’s not an accident. Caliber doesn’t matter."*

Dude, I scrolled up ten minutes ago. What is your problem?

Called it.

and as usual mandatory carry is acting retarded

Yuuuuup

just read that whole thing